LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Sandisk Ultra II vs Extreme III?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories
Thread started 19 Mar 2006 (Sunday) 22:44   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Jman215
Hatchling
Joined Mar 2006
1 post
[MORE/SHARE]

I have a canon digital rebel 300d. I also have a Sandisk Ultra II 512mb. I would like more speed, but can my camera handle that? If I get the Sandisk Extreme III 1 gig, will I see a big performance jump on my camera specifically?

Post #1, Mar 19, 2006 22:44:56




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Bob_A's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
8,108 posts
Alberta, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

You will see no difference. The Ultra II's are all you need for your 300D and all that I need for my 20D.

Post #2, Mar 19, 2006 22:55:02


Bob
SmugMugexternal link | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

LOG IN TO REPLY
NickSimcheck
Sir Chimp-a-lot
NickSimcheck's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
3,601 posts
SE, Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

No. The camera is the limitation.

I use Extreme III, but tests usually show that Ultra II's are just as fast, if not faster.

Post #3, Mar 19, 2006 22:55:39


Gear List | Feedback | Model Mayhemexternal link | About.Meexternal linkhttp://www.flickr.com/​photos/nicksimcheckexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Transonic
Senior Member
Transonic's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
329 posts
Los Angeles, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Ultra II - minimum write speed of 9 megabytes per second (MB/sec.) and a minimum read speed of 10MB/sec.

Extreme III - minimum write and read speeds of 20 megabytes per second.

Let me see if got this right. :rolleyes: If you're shooting jpeg at 2.5fps and your file sizes are like 2-3 megs then a CF card writing at 9MB/sec is enough even with a full buffer.

You might notice a difference in shooting RAW. Not sure how big the file sizes are but let's say they're 5mb each at 2.5fps and your buffer fills up... well you're gonna need a CF card that writes at 12.5mb/sec minimum to cover that burst. Either way, Ultra II should be enough for that camera.

Post #4, Mar 19, 2006 22:59:32


1D Mark II N | Sigma 12-24mm | 17-40mm f4L | Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 | 50mm f1.4
6Gb
of Extreme III | 1Gb Ultra II Plus

LOG IN TO REPLY
Transportithere
Goldmember
Transportithere's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
1,089 posts
Puget Sound, U.S.A.
[MORE/SHARE]

Great answer.. I was thinking a faster write would save me the 5 sec or so wait I experience with my 300D ans Ultra II

Post #5, Mar 19, 2006 23:02:57


POTN is a wonderful source of information.
POTN has taken me around the world.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Bob_A's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
8,108 posts
Alberta, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

Transportithere wrote:
the test results I read. stated that the Extreams are about twice as fast as the Ultra. What I dislike about my 300D with the Ultra II, is when I take a series of photos I need to wait 5 sec or more for the photos to load on to the CF card. I was hoping a faster cf card would make a differance.
But, you state different than the what I have read eariler.. I need more input...

The Extremes are fast, it's just that the 300D can't take advantage of the speed. It's a camera limitation, not a Ultra II limitation.

Post #6, Mar 19, 2006 23:04:56 as a reply to Transportithere's post 1 minute earlier.


Bob
SmugMugexternal link | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Moderator

Cocker Spaniel Mod

Jon's Avatar
Joined Jun 2004
68,176 posts
Bethesda, MD USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Rob Galbraith's tested a variety of CF cards in the 300Dexternal link. None of them are blazing fast, because the camera can't push out the data fast enough.

Post #7, Mar 20, 2006 10:19:53


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sweetride01
Member
Joined Oct 2004
53 posts
Tampa, FL, and Southampton, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

I just bought a 5D. I'm guessing this will require an Extreme III?

Post #8, Mar 20, 2006 15:20:05 as a reply to Jon's post 5 hours earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Moderator

Cocker Spaniel Mod

Jon's Avatar
Joined Jun 2004
68,176 posts
Bethesda, MD USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Rob's tested the 5D as well. Interestingly, a Lexar 133x was the fastest,and the 2 GB Ultra II fared better than the Extreme III.

Post #9, Mar 20, 2006 15:37:24


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sweetride01
Member
Joined Oct 2004
53 posts
Tampa, FL, and Southampton, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Jon wrote:
and the 2 GB Ultra II fared better than the Extreme III.

???Please explain???

Post #10, Mar 20, 2006 16:29:33 as a reply to Jon's post 52 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
nater
Senior Member
nater's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
201 posts
Chicagoland
[MORE/SHARE]

Sweetride01 wrote:
I just bought a 5D. I'm guessing this will require an Extreme III?

Require? The camera will write images to the cheapest card you can find!

CF card speed really comes into play when shooting bursts. I don't think a lot of people use the 5D for a lot of really long bursts since it's limited to 3FPS. Most sports/wildlife shooters use the 20D or 1D Mark II.

Post #11, Mar 20, 2006 16:29:59 as a reply to Sweetride01's post 1 hour earlier.


Canon 70D || Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 || Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS || Canon 24-105 f/4L || Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS || Sigma 30 f/1.4 || Canon 50 f/1.4 || Canon 85 f/1.8 || Canon 60 f/2.8 Macro || Rokinon 8 f/3.5 fisheye
Feisol CT-3401N Tripod || Kirk BH-3 Ballhead
Buy & Sell Feedback: POTN || FredMirandaexternal link || ebayexternal link ~~~ Pro tip: Separate focus from shutterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Sweetride01
Member
Joined Oct 2004
53 posts
Tampa, FL, and Southampton, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

nater wrote:
Require? The camera will write images to the cheapest card you can find!

What poor wording of me. Of course I know this. But 3fps for 10mb images (If I were to do that) would mean that there may be less of a block-up I suppose.

Post #12, Mar 20, 2006 17:41:32 as a reply to nater's post 1 hour earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
denMAR
Senior Member
denMAR's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
362 posts
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
[MORE/SHARE]

You know I've been trying to get a 2GB Ultra II for almost three weeks ago but everytime I go to Costco they're sold out! Must be because they just dropped from 230 to 100 bucks so if you're in Canada invest.

Post #13, Mar 20, 2006 17:43:24


366 iPhoneography Project: www.denmarblog.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
nater
Senior Member
nater's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
201 posts
Chicagoland
[MORE/SHARE]

Sweetride01 wrote:
???Please explain???

He's referring to this page: http://www.robgalbrait​h.com ...ti_page.asp?cid=600​7-8198external link

Rob Galbraith does extensive tests of different CF cards in different cameras. It lets you see exactly how much performance gain (or loss) you're getting for the money with your particular equipment.

Post #14, Mar 20, 2006 17:54:14 as a reply to Sweetride01's post 1 hour earlier.


Canon 70D || Canon 10-22 f/3.5-4.5 || Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS || Canon 24-105 f/4L || Canon 70-200 f/2.8L IS || Sigma 30 f/1.4 || Canon 50 f/1.4 || Canon 85 f/1.8 || Canon 60 f/2.8 Macro || Rokinon 8 f/3.5 fisheye
Feisol CT-3401N Tripod || Kirk BH-3 Ballhead
Buy & Sell Feedback: POTN || FredMirandaexternal link || ebayexternal link ~~~ Pro tip: Separate focus from shutterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Sweetride01
Member
Joined Oct 2004
53 posts
Tampa, FL, and Southampton, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

So the Extreme III is faster than the Ultra II for RAW files, but not the JPEG images. How does this make sense?

Post #15, Mar 20, 2006 18:06:37 as a reply to nater's post 12 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
30,887 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sandisk Ultra II vs Extreme III?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00122 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
853 guests, 798 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is chetgnegy

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.