Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
Thread started 19 Mar 2006 (Sunday) 22:44
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Sandisk Ultra II vs Extreme III?

 
Bakewell
Goldmember
1,385 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
     
Mar 20, 2006 20:52 |  #16
bannedPermanent ban

Let's not overlook the fact that the Extreme III are built to withstand "Extreme" use and abuse as well as being faster...according to Sandisk


Dave

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,438 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 44
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 20, 2006 22:22 as a reply to  @ Bakewell's post |  #17

Bakewell wrote:
Let's not overlook the fact that the Extreme III are built to withstand "Extreme" use and abuse as well as being faster...according to Sandisk

I'd happily overlook it, and it will never be part of my buying decision because it doesn't justify a 21% difference in cost. :lol:


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Mar 20, 2006 22:56 as a reply to  @ Bob_A's post |  #18

The difference is less than 10% on the site I get mine from - I reckon that's worth it.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,438 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 44
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 20, 2006 23:11 |  #19

That's pretty good. Where do you buy them?


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hermes
Goldmember
2,375 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Location: London, UK
     
Mar 20, 2006 23:16 as a reply to  @ Bob_A's post |  #20

Bob - http://www.picstop.co.​uk/ (external link)

Not sure how it compares to prices in the rest of the world but it's the cheapest i've found in the UK (I've seen Jessops sell the same cards for 3.5x the price)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,438 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 44
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 21, 2006 00:56 as a reply to  @ Hermes's post |  #21

Hermes wrote:
Bob - http://www.picstop.co.​uk/ (external link)

Not sure how it compares to prices in the rest of the world but it's the cheapest i've found in the UK (I've seen Jessops sell the same cards for 3.5x the price)

Didn't realize you were from the UK, which explains the wonky pricing. Even the picstop price for a 2 GB Extreme III card (74.90 pounds = $131.54 US) is high compared to the US ($109.95 @ B&H), so I can't imagine how out of line Jessops must be. The B&H price for a 2 GB Ultra II is $89.95 US or about $51.22 pounds.

I would bet that B&H isn't even the best NA price either ...


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
Avatar
3,907 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
     
Mar 21, 2006 09:00 as a reply to  @ post 1311141 |  #22

Notes:
Camera write speed tends to be a more limiting factor the card speeds.

For example:
1 series MkII and 5D can reach a top speed of about 7.6 to 7.8MB/s
The 350XT is about 6.3MB/s
20D is about 6MB/s (it should be same as 350XT, but for some reason it isn't)
The early 10D, 300D, D60 cameras run at about a wopping 1.4MB/s
And the Early 1 series ran at about 2-3MB/s

if 10x is 1.5MB/s then a 60x card is about as fast as you should need to get max picture speed. It doesn't completely work that way so you can still benefit from a 100 or 150X card to a limited extent.

Since a standard sandisk card runs at about 2-3MB/s this is fine for 1st gen cameras
for the 10D (same as 300D) I found Lexar 12x cards went as fast as the camera did. More speed then 2MB/s is a waste of money if was not upgrading at some point within the life of the card.
For newer cameras the Sandisk Ultra IIs at 9-10MB/s is more then enough at this time unless you need the extra reliability.

Now with the above said, you may still want to use a faster card because of transfer to computer times, but I personally consider this less critical. I only need the card to get the picture after that I have plenty of time to get it on the computer.

Just my opinion and a quick check of Rob Galbraith's CF database.


"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com (external link)
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher​.com/photoequipment.ht​m (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 218
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 21, 2006 12:49 as a reply to  @ post 1311141 |  #23

Sweetride01 wrote:
So the Extreme III is faster than the Ultra II for RAW files, but not the JPEG images. How does this make sense?

Probably the way Canon chose to write the directory and file entries from the 5D.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
69,628 posts
Likes: 218
Joined Jun 2004
Location: Bethesda, MD USA
     
Mar 21, 2006 12:56 as a reply to  @ Bob_A's post |  #24

Bob_A wrote:
I'd happily overlook it, and it will never be part of my buying decision because it doesn't justify a 21% difference in cost. :lol:

I just got 3 x 2 GB Extreme IIIs from B&H for $100 each; the Ultra IIs were only 10% less, at $90, and the Extreme IIIs came with neoprene 2-card holders and file recovery software on CD.


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mrclark321
Noinker
Avatar
7,527 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2005
Location: .... with a long history
     
Mar 21, 2006 13:07 |  #25

http://www.bhphotovide​o.com …EG&addedTroughT​ype=search (external link)


A crap pile of various gear!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Bob_A
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
8,438 posts
Gallery: 48 photos
Likes: 44
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 21, 2006 21:31 as a reply to  @ Jon's post |  #26

Jon wrote:
I just got 3 x 2 GB Extreme IIIs from B&H for $100 each; the Ultra IIs were only 10% less, at $90, and the Extreme IIIs came with neoprene 2-card holders and file recovery software on CD.

Great heads up Jon. B&H's current price for the 2 GB Extreme III's is $109.95, which puts them at 22% more expensive than the Ultra II's ... BUT, if you use psmar you can get the 2 GB Extreme III for $98.96!!!!


Bob
SmugMug (external link) | My Gear Ratings | My POTN Gallery

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mowman
Member
148 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA
     
Mar 22, 2006 10:52 as a reply to  @ Bob_A's post |  #27

I too got a 2gb Extreme II from B&H using the PSJAN code. Don't overlook the time saved while downloading using a seperate card reader.


My Gear

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

34,047 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sandisk Ultra II vs Extreme III?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon Accessories 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Gibby391
741 guests, 443 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.