Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 04 Apr 2006 (Tuesday) 06:55
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Best lens for long long distance

 
ladybelle2k
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Apr 04, 2006 06:55 |  #1

Hey all,

Well I've been out to the local eagle's nest again with the Bigma. It wasn't quite enough reach by itself so I tried adding the 2x extender and of course lost image quality.

Just for future dreams, what would be the perfect lens for this situation:

The eagles and nest are 150 yards from where we are allowed to photograph.

I'm looking at getting good detail and naturally sharp crisp pictures.

What would be the best lens in this situation if I had the bucks?


Canon Equipment

www.printroom (external link).com/pro/williamsphoto

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
tiha
Senior Member
Avatar
960 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Feb 2005
Location: 44°49′14″N 20°27′44″E
     
Apr 04, 2006 07:09 |  #2

Maybe Sigmonster (Sigma 300-800mm)? The biggest Canon lens is EF 600mm f/4 (not counting EF 1200mm f/5.6).


EOS 5D, EOS 30D, EOS 3, PowerShot G6
EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, TS-E 90mm f/2.8, EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Speedlite 580EX, Speedlite 430EX, Macro Ring Lite MR-14EX, Transmitter ST-E2
PBase: http://www.pbase.com/v​_tihomir (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ladybelle2k
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Apr 04, 2006 07:33 |  #3

Hmmmm...a sigma 800mm...never have seen any pics with that one. That might be interesting.


Canon Equipment

www.printroom (external link).com/pro/williamsphoto

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,966 posts
Likes: 404
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Apr 04, 2006 08:07 |  #4

iv just been thinking about this one, how about a digi scope ? for non moving shots it would not cost a lot and would give great reach .
Rob


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dewmuw
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,024 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Wirral, UK
     
Apr 04, 2006 08:08 as a reply to  @ ladybelle2k's post |  #5

ladybelle2k wrote:
Hmmmm...a sigma 800mm...never have seen any pics with that one. That might be interesting.

Have a look at this website:

www.suesbirdphotos.co.​uk (external link)

Sue uses a Sigma 300-800mm and her photos are some of the best you are ever likely to see.


Damian Waters
www.drumimages.co.uk (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I Chimp, therefore I am
Avatar
4,781 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Likes: 1622
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
     
Apr 04, 2006 08:23 as a reply to  @ ladybelle2k's post |  #6

ladybelle2k wrote:
Hmmmm...a sigma 800mm...never have seen any pics with that one. That might be interesting.

Search for "sigmonster" on these forums. Recent post showed results with a 2x converter.

Look for posts by "liquidstone"
eg
My favourite:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=137433
and
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=151457
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=150551

Lots more - with good details of camera settings (thanks Romy)


Dave
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/12185187@N00/
5D4, 1D4, 1DS2. Canon, Sigma lenses
Image editing OK

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Avatar
16,478 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Likes: 70
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Sayre, Pennsylvania
     
Apr 04, 2006 08:55 |  #7

Sigmonster runs just shy of $5k I believe, but to me, it seems like the end all wildlife zoom! You'd for sure have to get a super heavy duty tripod, as it's quite the beast! You'd for sure get those eagle shots, and without loss in quality from an extender, you may even be able to crop a bit to get your shot. Liquidstone's shots are great.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ladybelle2k
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
262 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Texas Hill Country
     
Apr 04, 2006 09:15 |  #8

Ok I have to plead ignorance...what is a digi scope?


Canon Equipment

www.printroom (external link).com/pro/williamsphoto

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
jjonsalt
Goldmember
1,502 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Location: Central Florida
     
Apr 04, 2006 09:30 |  #9
bannedPermanent ban

http://www.rugift.com …ras/rubinar_100​0_lens.htm (external link)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
11,141 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Nizza, Italia
     
Apr 04, 2006 09:37 |  #10

ladybelle2k wrote:
Hey all,

Well I've been out to the local eagle's nest again with the Bigma. It wasn't quite enough reach by itself so I tried adding the 2x extender and of course lost image quality.

Just for future dreams, what would be the perfect lens for this situation:

The eagles and nest are 150 yards from where we are allowed to photograph.

I'm looking at getting good detail and naturally sharp crisp pictures.

What would be the best lens in this situation if I had the bucks?

I see at least one practical/economical solution for your situation:
Find eagles that are withing the reach of your Bigmah. ;)


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Alan ­ B
Goldmember
Avatar
2,732 posts
Gallery: 34 photos
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 392
Joined Dec 2004
Location: UK
     
Apr 04, 2006 11:07 as a reply to  @ PetKal's post |  #11

Can i just ask, whats stopping you getting closer ?.

Oh and agreed about using the HUGE Sigmonster :) .




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,190 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Likes: 4338
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Apr 04, 2006 12:13 |  #12

Ladybelle,.
Sigmonster 300-800mm is a good choice,. but if cost is no object and long distance is worth more than zoom flexibilyt the Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS is aguably a better solution.

Sigma offers 800mm @ f/5.6
The 600mm with a 1.4X T-con offers 840mm @ f/5.6 and does this with the very significant addition of Image Stabilization. Birders use the 600mm with the 1.4X attached all day.. and image quality remains superb even wide open.

At these focal lengths the increase in keepers that IS offers is exponential...

Also,. if using a 1 series,. the 600mm will AF with the 2X and results are still pretty good when stopped down to say f/11

Either of these lenses though are in a world of there own size and weight wise,. say 13 pounds? :shock:

The lighter weight solution,. at about the same price as a Sigmonster is the Canon 500mm f/4L IS.
Used with a 1.4X you get 700mm f/5.6 and IS. On a 1 series a useable 1000mm f/8 IS (better when stopped down to f/11 at least ) Much lighter than the other two.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,966 posts
Likes: 404
Joined Feb 2005
Location: N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
     
Apr 04, 2006 12:52 as a reply to  @ ladybelle2k's post |  #13

ladybelle2k wrote:
Ok I have to plead ignorance...what is a digi scope?

ITS a spoting scope that you attach a digi camera too henc digi scope you just need a simple addaptor depending on the scope you can get far more reach than even the sigmonster .
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htm (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,386 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Apr 04, 2006 12:53 as a reply to  @ Alan B's post |  #14

Alan B wrote:
Can i just ask, whats stopping you getting closer ?.

Oh and agreed about using the HUGE Sigmonster :) .

Probably the law and fines. There are often exclusion zones around rare birds like that they they don't get disturbed and abandon the nest.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,386 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 7
Joined Dec 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA USA
     
Apr 04, 2006 12:56 as a reply to  @ GyRob's post |  #15

gyrob wrote:
ITS a spoting scope that you attach a digi camera too henc digi scope you just need a simple addaptor depending on the scope you can get far more reach than even the sigmonster .
Rob.

You do get a lot more reach but at the cost of a lot less light. These things are designed for the much more sensitive human eye. Attach a camera and you'll find you maximum appeture may be in the f/8 to f/16 range. So it better be bright and a non-moving subject.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

8,344 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best lens for long long distance
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Gibby391
722 guests, 389 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.