Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 04 Apr 2006 (Tuesday) 06:55
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Best lens for long long distance

 
ladybelle2k
Senior Member
ladybelle2k's Avatar
262 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Texas Hill Country
Apr 04, 2006 06:55 |  #1

Hey all,

Well I've been out to the local eagle's nest again with the Bigma. It wasn't quite enough reach by itself so I tried adding the 2x extender and of course lost image quality.

Just for future dreams, what would be the perfect lens for this situation:

The eagles and nest are 150 yards from where we are allowed to photograph.

I'm looking at getting good detail and naturally sharp crisp pictures.

What would be the best lens in this situation if I had the bucks?


Canon Equipment

www.printroomexternal link.com/pro/williamsphoto

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
tiha
Senior Member
tiha's Avatar
960 posts
Joined Feb 2005
44°49′14″N 20°27′44″E
Apr 04, 2006 07:09 |  #2

Maybe Sigmonster (Sigma 300-800mm)? The biggest Canon lens is EF 600mm f/4 (not counting EF 1200mm f/5.6).


EOS 5D, EOS 30D, EOS 3, PowerShot G6
EF 50mm f/1.4 USM, EF 85mm f/1.8 USM, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM, TS-E 90mm f/2.8, EF 15mm f/2.8 Fisheye, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
Speedlite 580EX, Speedlite 430EX, Macro Ring Lite MR-14EX, Transmitter ST-E2
PBase: http://www.pbase.com/v​_tihomirexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ladybelle2k
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
ladybelle2k's Avatar
262 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Texas Hill Country
Apr 04, 2006 07:33 |  #3

Hmmmm...a sigma 800mm...never have seen any pics with that one. That might be interesting.


Canon Equipment

www.printroomexternal link.com/pro/williamsphoto

LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,926 posts
Joined Feb 2005
N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
Apr 04, 2006 08:07 |  #4

iv just been thinking about this one, how about a digi scope ? for non moving shots it would not cost a lot and would give great reach .
Rob


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htmexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dewmuw
Cream of the Crop
dewmuw's Avatar
6,022 posts
Joined Jul 2002
Wirral, UK
Apr 04, 2006 08:08 as a reply to ladybelle2k's post |  #5

ladybelle2k wrote:
Hmmmm...a sigma 800mm...never have seen any pics with that one. That might be interesting.

Have a look at this website:

www.suesbirdphotos.co.​ukexternal link

Sue uses a Sigma 300-800mm and her photos are some of the best you are ever likely to see.


Damian Waters
www.drumimages.co.ukexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Choderboy
I Chimp, therefore I am
Choderboy's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
Sydney, Australia
Apr 04, 2006 08:23 as a reply to ladybelle2k's post |  #6

ladybelle2k wrote:
Hmmmm...a sigma 800mm...never have seen any pics with that one. That might be interesting.

Search for "sigmonster" on these forums. Recent post showed results with a 2x converter.

Look for posts by "liquidstone"
eg
My favourite:
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=137433
and
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=151457
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=150551

Lots more - with good details of camera settings (thanks Romy)


Dave
https://www.flickr.com​/photos/12185187@N00/ (external link)
1D4, 1DS2, 7D2. Canon, Sigma lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Ronald S. Jr.'s Avatar
16,408 posts
Gallery: 12 photos
Joined Aug 2005
Sayre, Pennsylvania
Apr 04, 2006 08:55 |  #7

Sigmonster runs just shy of $5k I believe, but to me, it seems like the end all wildlife zoom! You'd for sure have to get a super heavy duty tripod, as it's quite the beast! You'd for sure get those eagle shots, and without loss in quality from an extender, you may even be able to crop a bit to get your shot. Liquidstone's shots are great.


Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

LOG IN TO REPLY
ladybelle2k
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
ladybelle2k's Avatar
262 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Texas Hill Country
Apr 04, 2006 09:15 |  #8

Ok I have to plead ignorance...what is a digi scope?


Canon Equipment

www.printroomexternal link.com/pro/williamsphoto

LOG IN TO REPLY
jjonsalt
Goldmember
1,502 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Central Florida
Apr 04, 2006 09:30 |  #9
banned

http://www.rugift.com ...ras/rubinar_1000_le​ns.htmexternal link




LOG IN TO REPLY
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
PetKal's Avatar
11,141 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Nizza, Italia
Apr 04, 2006 09:37 |  #10

ladybelle2k wrote:
Hey all,

Well I've been out to the local eagle's nest again with the Bigma. It wasn't quite enough reach by itself so I tried adding the 2x extender and of course lost image quality.

Just for future dreams, what would be the perfect lens for this situation:

The eagles and nest are 150 yards from where we are allowed to photograph.

I'm looking at getting good detail and naturally sharp crisp pictures.

What would be the best lens in this situation if I had the bucks?

I see at least one practical/economical solution for your situation:
Find eagles that are withing the reach of your Bigmah. ;)


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alan ­ B
Goldmember
Alan B's Avatar
Joined Dec 2004
UK
Apr 04, 2006 11:07 as a reply to PetKal's post |  #11

Can i just ask, whats stopping you getting closer ?.

Oh and agreed about using the HUGE Sigmonster :) .




LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000), Honorary Member: Kill Team: Alpha
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,786 posts
Gallery: 68 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Apr 04, 2006 12:13 |  #12

Ladybelle,.
Sigmonster 300-800mm is a good choice,. but if cost is no object and long distance is worth more than zoom flexibilyt the Canon EF 600mm f/4L IS is aguably a better solution.

Sigma offers 800mm @ f/5.6
The 600mm with a 1.4X T-con offers 840mm @ f/5.6 and does this with the very significant addition of Image Stabilization. Birders use the 600mm with the 1.4X attached all day.. and image quality remains superb even wide open.

At these focal lengths the increase in keepers that IS offers is exponential...

Also,. if using a 1 series,. the 600mm will AF with the 2X and results are still pretty good when stopped down to say f/11

Either of these lenses though are in a world of there own size and weight wise,. say 13 pounds? :shock:

The lighter weight solution,. at about the same price as a Sigmonster is the Canon 500mm f/4L IS.
Used with a 1.4X you get 700mm f/5.6 and IS. On a 1 series a useable 1000mm f/8 IS (better when stopped down to f/11 at least ) Much lighter than the other two.


Selling my 200mm f/2L or 1.8L
GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,926 posts
Joined Feb 2005
N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
Apr 04, 2006 12:52 as a reply to ladybelle2k's post |  #13

ladybelle2k wrote:
Ok I have to plead ignorance...what is a digi scope?

ITS a spoting scope that you attach a digi camera too henc digi scope you just need a simple addaptor depending on the scope you can get far more reach than even the sigmonster .
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htmexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Citizensmith's Avatar
6,386 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Dec 2004
Sacramento, CA USA
Apr 04, 2006 12:53 as a reply to Alan B's post |  #14

Alan B wrote:
Can i just ask, whats stopping you getting closer ?.

Oh and agreed about using the HUGE Sigmonster :) .

Probably the law and fines. There are often exclusion zones around rare birds like that they they don't get disturbed and abandon the nest.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Citizensmith
Cream of the Crop
Citizensmith's Avatar
6,386 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Joined Dec 2004
Sacramento, CA USA
Apr 04, 2006 12:56 as a reply to GyRob's post |  #15

gyrob wrote:
ITS a spoting scope that you attach a digi camera too henc digi scope you just need a simple addaptor depending on the scope you can get far more reach than even the sigmonster .
Rob.

You do get a lot more reach but at the cost of a lot less light. These things are designed for the much more sensitive human eye. Attach a camera and you'll find you maximum appeture may be in the f/8 to f/16 range. So it better be bright and a non-moving subject.


My POTN Gallery, Complete gear list,
Tradition - Just because you've always done it that way doesn't mean it's not incredibly stupid.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

7,251 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best lens for long long distance
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00092 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is matinolx
694 guests, 449 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016