LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


400mm Prime or 300mm Prime + 1.4 TC

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 12 Apr 2006 (Wednesday) 01:11   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
StealthLude
Goldmember
StealthLude's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
3,680 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Im lookin to get a long lens here, I really want a prime lens for my longest lens...

I was looking into getting the 400mm 5.6 prime,

for a few hundred bucks, I cna get the 300mm f4 IS prime with a 1.4tc.

I wanted to hear your guys opinion on the image quality of the 300 + the TC.

The reason I wanted to get a prime was really for the IQ, if the TC is really going to take away from that, then I rather just get a 100-400 lens...

And help with making a decesion like that? Am i missing out on something?

Image stabalizer is a pretty big deal to me, so that was also taken into consideration.

Post #1, Apr 12, 2006 01:11:09


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
Joined Jun 2005
9,908 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

There's no free lunch; you can't have your cake and eat it too (well close if you have the 500IS or 600IS). The 400f5.6 is a little better than the 300f4+TC in terms of IQ. The latter gets you closer MFD and IS. The 400f5.6 has AF that screams too. The 100400IS is the most versatile and a good compromise (vis-a-vis these primes). If IS is that important, then the choice is narrowed down. If you want the absolute best IQ at 400mm, then it's the native prime.

Post #2, Apr 12, 2006 01:19:03




LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
StealthLude's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
3,680 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Anyone have pictures of the 300mm with the 1.4 TC?

Post #3, Apr 12, 2006 01:30:20


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrclark321
Noinker
mrclark321's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
7,508 posts
.... with a long history
[MORE/SHARE]

Since you already have the 70-200 I would go with the 400mm prime personally. AF is quicker and it's a little sharper and lighter than the 100-400. The 100-400 is an excellent lens and very capable, I can't comment on the 300mm because I never used it but I was in the same predicament and ended up with the 400 and glad I made the choice. :)

Dan

Post #4, Apr 12, 2006 01:38:10


A crap pile of various gear!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Juan ­ Zas
Goldmember
Juan Zas's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
1,511 posts
Madrid - ESP
[MORE/SHARE]

StealthLude wrote:
Anyone have pictures of the 300mm with the 1.4 TC?

http://photography-on-the.net ...55284&highlight=300​+f%2F4

Post #5, Apr 12, 2006 01:50:00 as a reply to StealthLude's post 19 minutes earlier.


Cheers
Juan
_______________
My Gear
My Photo Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Simon ­ Harrison
"Bag Snapper"
Joined Feb 2005
3,053 posts
Ingleby Barwick, Teesside
[MORE/SHARE]

Have a look on my website (link in my sig). Almost all of the shots in the online galleries were taken with the 300mm f/4 IS + 1.4 TC

Cheers,

Simon.

Post #6, Apr 12, 2006 01:50:58


Simon

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/srhmoto/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
calicokat is BANNED
calicokat's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
14,720 posts
Southern California
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd go with a 100-400L for versatilty and Image Stabilizer. Great Lens

Post #7, Apr 12, 2006 02:05:56


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Websiteexternal link

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

LOG IN TO REPLY
chrishunt
Goldmember
chrishunt's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
1,892 posts
Portland, Oregon
[MORE/SHARE]

My vote, get the 300 + 1.4x. More versatile and you have IS for when you need it.

These might help:

http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=150692
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=148875
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=145047
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=135902
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=131090
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=103852
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=56149
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=86745
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=82026
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=81034
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=72091

Post #8, Apr 12, 2006 03:26:00 as a reply to calicokat's post 1 hour earlier.


chris hunt
chrishuntphoto.comexternal link | feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
Goldmember
morehtml's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
2,987 posts
Murfreesboro, TN
[MORE/SHARE]

The 100-400L would probably make the most sense for you here.

Post #9, Apr 12, 2006 06:43:37


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery"external link
www.allensvisions.comexternal link

more glass than I need

LOG IN TO REPLY
DionM
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2004
273 posts
Brisbane, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

I had the same dilemma.

I got the 400 5.6. I figured I liked the option of using it with a 1.4x TC.

Post #10, Apr 12, 2006 08:41:42


Gear List
Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ W.
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2003
841 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

My wife has the 100-400, and she's gotten some terrific shots with it. I haven't tried it myself yet.
As most of my shots are at longer distances, primes are the better choice for me.
I have the 300f/4L IS which I use with a Canon 1.4TC. The combo is terrific. Provided I do my part correctly, shots are razor sharp.
I like this setup as it gives me two excellent primes;
a 300f/4 and a 420f/5.6, both with IS (IS on a long lens is a must for me).

Jack

Post #11, Apr 12, 2006 09:09:19 as a reply to DionM's post 27 minutes earlier.


20D, 30D, 500f/4L IS, 300f/4L IS, 300f/2.8L IS, Canon 1.4TC, Canon 2xTC, 70-300IS, 17-85IS, EFS 10-22, Sigma 150 Macro, 3021PRO, RRS BH-40LR, Gitzo 1325, full Wimberley Head v2, Wimberley Sidekick, and a bunch of other stuff. :-)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
FlashZebra
This space available
FlashZebra's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
4,426 posts
Northern Kentucky
[MORE/SHARE]

StealthLude wrote:
I was looking into getting the 400mm 5.6 prime,
for a few hundred bucks, I cna get the 300mm f4 IS prime with a 1.4tc.

Here is a nice test report that shows what happens to a Canon 300mm F4 IS, with regard to sharpness, with 1.4X and 2.0X teleconverters.

http://www.eospix.com/​content-20.htmlexternal link

Here is also an overview of the 400mm or 300mm w/TC from one "expert's" perspective.

http://www.birdsasart.​com//faq_4f56or3is.htm​lexternal link

Enjoy! Lon

Post #12, Apr 12, 2006 10:50:10


*
http://flashzebra.com/external link
*

LOG IN TO REPLY
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Billginthekeys's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
7,354 posts
Islamorada, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

well, sharpness wise i dont think youd be dissapointed with either prime. i am in the same dilema as you. and now my question is about the focus speed. i used the 300 prime in a store the other day, and the focus was SOOO fast, even faster than my 70-200. And ive heard that the 400 is the same (the 100-400 is fairly fast but has nothing on these). So my question is, those of you who use the TC on the 300, but much is the focus speed slowed down. lets say the primary use for the lens is flying birds, i dont want focus speed to be an issue with it. But at the same time the IS on the 300 is very effective ( i was shooting sharp pics in the store at like 1/100th or less), and the fact that it can also be a 300 f4 and a 420 5.6 (instead of only 400 5.6) is attractive. that way i could use the 300 for sports and 420 for birding.

So in short, how much focus speed does the 300 loose with the extender

Post #13, Apr 12, 2006 12:43:52


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Galleryexternal linkMy Gear
what the L. just go for it.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jack ­ W.
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2003
841 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Billginthekeys wrote:
So in short, how much focus speed does the 300 loose with the extender

With the 300f/4L IS+Canon 1.4TC on my 20D, the difference is VERY slight; it's still very fast. However, I haven't tried birds in flight yet.
The same combo on my 30D shows no difference in autofocus with the TC. The 30D is absolutely quicker and more accurate with autofocus. The 300f/4+1.4TC was the first thing I tried when I got the 30D. I noticed the improvement immediately, and have since confirmed it with my 300f2.8L IS+2xTC.
As I posted earlier, IS is more important to me than any minimal increase in focus speed.
A lens can be lightning quick with autofocus, but if I can't hold it steady, it does me no good (hey, I'm not 25 any more heh heh).

Jack

Post #14, Apr 12, 2006 13:00:26 as a reply to Billginthekeys's post 16 minutes earlier.


20D, 30D, 500f/4L IS, 300f/4L IS, 300f/2.8L IS, Canon 1.4TC, Canon 2xTC, 70-300IS, 17-85IS, EFS 10-22, Sigma 150 Macro, 3021PRO, RRS BH-40LR, Gitzo 1325, full Wimberley Head v2, Wimberley Sidekick, and a bunch of other stuff. :-)

LOG IN TO REPLY
reewik
Goldmember
reewik's Avatar
Joined Dec 2004
2,657 posts
Lavergne, TN
[MORE/SHARE]

Do a search as I too asked the same question a few months back. I went with the 400 5.6L ... No regrets as it is an awsome lens. I too have the 70-200. About to get the 1.4x that can be used for both.


Hard, Hard , Hard decision to say the least.

Post #15, Apr 12, 2006 13:25:00


Eric: www.avianart.netexternal link
Canon 1D MKIII, 600 f4 IS, 85 1.2L
Canon 1D (Classic),50 2.5 Macro, 1x lifesize

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
20,644 views & 0 likes for this thread
400mm Prime or 300mm Prime + 1.4 TC
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00092 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
896 guests, 831 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is JSPvita

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.