Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 12 Apr 2006 (Wednesday) 11:36
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM

 
nomorebs
Member
nomorebs's Avatar
182 posts

Joined Feb 2006

Norway
MORE INFO

I am about to pull the trigger on the EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM.
Are there any big pros & cons that I should be aware of or consider when buying this lens? Or is it generally considered a 'safe buy' as far as build quality, sharpness etc is concerned?

Apr 12, 2006 11:36

400D+BG-3E | 40D
16-35 2.8L II
| 50 1.2L | 100 2.8 Macro | What's next?
2 x LowePro Dryzone Rover | Kata H-14

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts

Joined Jun 2005
MORE INFO

This is a safe buy. It's "critically" sharp. It will make your 24-105L look bad.

Apr 12, 2006 11:40



LOG IN TO REPLY
steved110
Cream of the Crop
steved110's Avatar
5,776 posts

Joined Dec 2005

East Sussex UK
MORE INFO

You can't go wrong, it's the best 100mm macro made, how great that you are a Canon user and can benefit from it. Noinkers have to spend a lot more for less quality ( tho they are about to get a 105mm macro with vibration reduction..)
the only improvements on this would be if you needed 150 or 180mm - but IMHO those extreme lenses are more limited - the 100mm macro also doubles as a great short tele/ portrait lens

Apr 12, 2006 12:27

Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
42,233 posts
GALLERY: 47 photos

Joined Apr 2003

Rhode Island USA
MORE INFO

Great buy,..

Cons:

Not the fastest USM AF in the world (no macro is that fast though)
Does not take Canon's T-cons

But awesome image quality!

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1
Apr 12, 2006 13:34

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
calicokat is BANNED
calicokat's Avatar
14,720 posts

Joined Oct 2005

Southern California
MORE INFO

Great lens, here are a couple shots taken with it. First is a macro shot, second is a tribute to its versatility beyond macro.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.
Apr 12, 2006 18:02

"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Websiteexternal link

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarrad
Senior Member
Jarrad's Avatar
801 posts

Joined Jan 2005

B.C., Canada
MORE INFO

You really can't go wrong with this lens. Especially if you have an interest in Macro Photography. Even if you don't, it's a very versatile lens. It's every bit as sharp as everyone has been describing.

Examples:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



:)
Apr 12, 2006 18:21

.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Raj
Goldmember
Raj's Avatar
2,050 posts

Joined Dec 2004

Tokyo, Japan
MORE INFO

Its an excellent lens, you cant go wrong with it. pros ? already metioned by all, DOF control & bokeh is excellent, can be used as portrait lens too.
Only con that comes to mind is slow AF in macro range & low light, but then the lens has full time internal manual focussing, so its not a issue at all. Outdoors AF is fast enough.

Color saturation, sharpness, contrast, just excellent.
A sample @ f3.5, iso 400, handheld :-)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.pbase.com/b​lue_star/image/4714186​6.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'
Apr 12, 2006 18:53

1DX, 5D, 20D with BG E2, Sigma EX DG 8mm F3.5 Circular Fish Eye, EF 15 mm f2.8 fish eye, EFS 10-22 mm f3.5-4.5, EF 24-70 F2.8 L mark ii, EF 24-105 f4 L IS, EF 16-35 f2.8 L , Sigma 35mm f1.4 A, 50 f1.8 mkII, 50 mm F1.2 L, EF f85mm 1.8, EF 100 f2.8 macro, EF 135 F2 L, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX HSM, EF 70-200 f2.8 L, IS USM mark ii, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS, Sigma 18-125 f3.5-5.6 DC, APO 1.4x, G3, Cheapy Velbon Sherpa 435, Slick Carbon Fiber, Speedlite 430EX and 580EX with stofen OM-EW

LOG IN TO REPLY
rohnb
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Mar 2006

Minneapolis, MN
MORE INFO

I'm very close to ordering the Canon 100mm macro as well, though I do have to admit to some stalling wondering if the Sigma 150 or 180 might be a better choice for not a considerable amount more simply because of the increased working room for insects. I'd love to read (more) comments/opinions, if anyone has any to share ;-)a

Apr 12, 2006 19:08



LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckandbob
Member
186 posts
Joined Apr 2006

Chicago
MORE INFO

Ah. Thanks Raj - I see that now.

Apr 12, 2006 19:51

Canon 1D Mark III
16-35 f2.8 L II / 85 f1.2 L / 24-105 f4 L / 70-200 f4 L / 300 f4 L IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts

Joined Jun 2005
MORE INFO

rohnb wrote:
I'm very close to ordering the Canon 100mm macro as well, though I do have to admit to some stalling wondering if the Sigma 150 or 180 might be a better choice for not a considerable amount more simply because of the increased working room for insects. I'd love to read (more) comments/opinions, if anyone has any to share ;-)a

Optically they are all very close; you just don't get sharper than dedicated macros (from center to edge). If you need the working distance, then the decision is easy.

Apr 12, 2006 23:54 as a reply to rohnb's post 4 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Livinthalife's Avatar
5,115 posts

Joined Jan 2006

Austin,TX
MORE INFO

since we are kinda on the subject. I found what I think is a good deal. A 100mm macro 2.8 NON-usm plus a 50mm 2.5 for under $250...would i be able to get allot of use from the non USM? my 50 1.8 isnt USM, and the focus speed doesnt bother me, but my USM kit lens is pretty quick. I really dont notice much of a difference in speed between the 2 in focusing unless close ups, orlow light.

Apr 13, 2006 00:05

-Andy-
Canon 6D 85 1.8 Sig 50 1.4
24-105 F4 IS L 580EX 70-200 2.8 100 2.8 L
...:::My Website:::...external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Raj
Goldmember
Raj's Avatar
2,050 posts

Joined Dec 2004

Tokyo, Japan
MORE INFO

Livinthalife wrote:
since we are kinda on the subject. I found what I think is a good deal. A 100mm macro 2.8 NON-usm plus a 50mm 2.5 for under $250...would i be able to get allot of use from the non USM? my 50 1.8 isnt USM, and the focus speed doesnt bother me, but my USM kit lens is pretty quick. I really dont notice much of a difference in speed between the 2 in focusing unless close ups, orlow light.

USM wont matter much for 100mm macro IMO. I focus manually most of the time anyway. Under $250 is very good price, but I am not so sure about that 50mm 2.5. which lens is this ?

Apr 13, 2006 00:09 as a reply to Livinthalife's post 3 minutes earlier.

1DX, 5D, 20D with BG E2, Sigma EX DG 8mm F3.5 Circular Fish Eye, EF 15 mm f2.8 fish eye, EFS 10-22 mm f3.5-4.5, EF 24-70 F2.8 L mark ii, EF 24-105 f4 L IS, EF 16-35 f2.8 L , Sigma 35mm f1.4 A, 50 f1.8 mkII, 50 mm F1.2 L, EF f85mm 1.8, EF 100 f2.8 macro, EF 135 F2 L, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX HSM, EF 70-200 f2.8 L, IS USM mark ii, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS, Sigma 18-125 f3.5-5.6 DC, APO 1.4x, G3, Cheapy Velbon Sherpa 435, Slick Carbon Fiber, Speedlite 430EX and 580EX with stofen OM-EW

LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Livinthalife's Avatar
5,115 posts

Joined Jan 2006

Austin,TX
MORE INFO

it says "compact macro" I figured just for the one lens would be worth it. but im sur ei could find a use for another 50mm

Apr 13, 2006 00:20

-Andy-
Canon 6D 85 1.8 Sig 50 1.4
24-105 F4 IS L 580EX 70-200 2.8 100 2.8 L
...:::My Website:::...external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Livinthalife's Avatar
5,115 posts

Joined Jan 2006

Austin,TX
MORE INFO

heres the site, its actually a yahoo auction. if want to take a look or bid.

http://page4.auctions.​yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction​/d60859490external link

Apr 13, 2006 00:21

-Andy-
Canon 6D 85 1.8 Sig 50 1.4
24-105 F4 IS L 580EX 70-200 2.8 100 2.8 L
...:::My Website:::...external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Jesper's Avatar
2,742 posts

Joined Oct 2003

The Netherlands
MORE INFO

The EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macroexternal link is not a real macro lens. It magnifies up to 1:2, not 1:1 like a real macro lens.

You need the optional Life Size Converter EFexternal link with the 50mm f/2.5 to get 1:1 magnification.

Apr 13, 2006 02:36

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,071,768 views & 7 likes for this thread
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00093 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is gilmors
848 guests, 756 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015