Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 12 Apr 2006 (Wednesday) 11:36
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM

 
nomorebs
Member
nomorebs's Avatar
182 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Norway
Apr 12, 2006 11:36 |  #1

I am about to pull the trigger on the EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM.
Are there any big pros & cons that I should be aware of or consider when buying this lens? Or is it generally considered a 'safe buy' as far as build quality, sharpness etc is concerned?


400D+BG-3E | 40D
16-35 2.8L II
| 50 1.2L | 100 2.8 Macro | What's next?
2 x LowePro Dryzone Rover | Kata H-14

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Apr 12, 2006 11:40 |  #2

This is a safe buy. It's "critically" sharp. It will make your 24-105L look bad.




LOG IN TO REPLY
steved110
Cream of the Crop
steved110's Avatar
5,776 posts
Joined Dec 2005
East Sussex UK
Apr 12, 2006 12:27 |  #3

You can't go wrong, it's the best 100mm macro made, how great that you are a Canon user and can benefit from it. Noinkers have to spend a lot more for less quality ( tho they are about to get a 105mm macro with vibration reduction..)
the only improvements on this would be if you needed 150 or 180mm - but IMHO those extreme lenses are more limited - the 100mm macro also doubles as a great short tele/ portrait lens


Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
44,281 posts
Gallery: 60 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Apr 12, 2006 13:34 |  #4

Great buy,..

Cons:

Not the fastest USM AF in the world (no macro is that fast though)
Does not take Canon's T-cons

But awesome image quality!

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://images.fotopic.​net ...p;outx=600&nore​size=1

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
Cream of the Crop
calicokat's Avatar
14,720 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Southern California
Apr 12, 2006 18:02 |  #5

Great lens, here are a couple shots taken with it. First is a macro shot, second is a tribute to its versatility beyond macro.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Websiteexternal link

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jarrad
Senior Member
Jarrad's Avatar
801 posts
Joined Jan 2005
B.C., Canada
Apr 12, 2006 18:21 |  #6

You really can't go wrong with this lens. Especially if you have an interest in Macro Photography. Even if you don't, it's a very versatile lens. It's every bit as sharp as everyone has been describing.

Examples:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



:)

.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Raj
Goldmember
Raj's Avatar
2,050 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Tokyo, Japan
Apr 12, 2006 18:53 |  #7

Its an excellent lens, you cant go wrong with it. pros ? already metioned by all, DOF control & bokeh is excellent, can be used as portrait lens too.
Only con that comes to mind is slow AF in macro range & low light, but then the lens has full time internal manual focussing, so its not a issue at all. Outdoors AF is fast enough.

Color saturation, sharpness, contrast, just excellent.
A sample @ f3.5, iso 400, handheld :-)

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.pbase.com/b​lue_star/image/4714186​6.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif'

1DX, 5D, 20D with BG E2, Sigma EX DG 8mm F3.5 Circular Fish Eye, EF 15 mm f2.8 fish eye, EFS 10-22 mm f3.5-4.5, EF 24-70 F2.8 L mark ii, EF 24-105 f4 L IS, EF 16-35 f2.8 L , Sigma 35mm f1.4 A, 50 f1.8 mkII, 50 mm F1.2 L, EF f85mm 1.8, EF 100 f2.8 macro, EF 135 F2 L, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX HSM, EF 70-200 f2.8 L, IS USM mark ii, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS, Sigma 18-125 f3.5-5.6 DC, APO 1.4x, G3, Cheapy Velbon Sherpa 435, Slick Carbon Fiber, Speedlite 430EX and 580EX with stofen OM-EW

LOG IN TO REPLY
rohnb
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Minneapolis, MN
Apr 12, 2006 19:08 |  #8

I'm very close to ordering the Canon 100mm macro as well, though I do have to admit to some stalling wondering if the Sigma 150 or 180 might be a better choice for not a considerable amount more simply because of the increased working room for insects. I'd love to read (more) comments/opinions, if anyone has any to share ;-)a




LOG IN TO REPLY
chuckandbob
Member
186 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Chicago
Apr 12, 2006 19:51 |  #9

Ah. Thanks Raj - I see that now.


Canon 1D Mark III
16-35 f2.8 L II / 85 f1.2 L / 24-105 f4 L / 70-200 f4 L / 300 f4 L IS

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,908 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Apr 12, 2006 23:54 as a reply to rohnb's post |  #10

rohnb wrote:
I'm very close to ordering the Canon 100mm macro as well, though I do have to admit to some stalling wondering if the Sigma 150 or 180 might be a better choice for not a considerable amount more simply because of the increased working room for insects. I'd love to read (more) comments/opinions, if anyone has any to share ;-)a

Optically they are all very close; you just don't get sharper than dedicated macros (from center to edge). If you need the working distance, then the decision is easy.




LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Livinthalife's Avatar
5,117 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Austin,TX
Apr 13, 2006 00:05 |  #11

since we are kinda on the subject. I found what I think is a good deal. A 100mm macro 2.8 NON-usm plus a 50mm 2.5 for under $250...would i be able to get allot of use from the non USM? my 50 1.8 isnt USM, and the focus speed doesnt bother me, but my USM kit lens is pretty quick. I really dont notice much of a difference in speed between the 2 in focusing unless close ups, orlow light.


-Andy-
Canon 6D 85 1.8 Sig 50 1.4
24-105 F4 IS L 580EX 70-200 2.8 100 2.8 L
...:::My Website:::...external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Raj
Goldmember
Raj's Avatar
2,050 posts
Joined Dec 2004
Tokyo, Japan
Apr 13, 2006 00:09 as a reply to Livinthalife's post |  #12

Livinthalife wrote:
since we are kinda on the subject. I found what I think is a good deal. A 100mm macro 2.8 NON-usm plus a 50mm 2.5 for under $250...would i be able to get allot of use from the non USM? my 50 1.8 isnt USM, and the focus speed doesnt bother me, but my USM kit lens is pretty quick. I really dont notice much of a difference in speed between the 2 in focusing unless close ups, orlow light.

USM wont matter much for 100mm macro IMO. I focus manually most of the time anyway. Under $250 is very good price, but I am not so sure about that 50mm 2.5. which lens is this ?


1DX, 5D, 20D with BG E2, Sigma EX DG 8mm F3.5 Circular Fish Eye, EF 15 mm f2.8 fish eye, EFS 10-22 mm f3.5-4.5, EF 24-70 F2.8 L mark ii, EF 24-105 f4 L IS, EF 16-35 f2.8 L , Sigma 35mm f1.4 A, 50 f1.8 mkII, 50 mm F1.2 L, EF f85mm 1.8, EF 100 f2.8 macro, EF 135 F2 L, Sigma 70-200 f2.8 EX HSM, EF 70-200 f2.8 L, IS USM mark ii, EF 100-400 f4.5-5.6 L IS, Sigma 18-125 f3.5-5.6 DC, APO 1.4x, G3, Cheapy Velbon Sherpa 435, Slick Carbon Fiber, Speedlite 430EX and 580EX with stofen OM-EW

LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Livinthalife's Avatar
5,117 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Austin,TX
Apr 13, 2006 00:20 |  #13

it says "compact macro" I figured just for the one lens would be worth it. but im sur ei could find a use for another 50mm


-Andy-
Canon 6D 85 1.8 Sig 50 1.4
24-105 F4 IS L 580EX 70-200 2.8 100 2.8 L
...:::My Website:::...external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Livinthalife's Avatar
5,117 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Austin,TX
Apr 13, 2006 00:21 |  #14

heres the site, its actually a yahoo auction. if want to take a look or bid.

http://page4.auctions.​yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction​/d60859490external link


-Andy-
Canon 6D 85 1.8 Sig 50 1.4
24-105 F4 IS L 580EX 70-200 2.8 100 2.8 L
...:::My Website:::...external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
Goldmember
Jesper's Avatar
2,742 posts
Joined Oct 2003
The Netherlands
Apr 13, 2006 02:36 |  #15

The EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macroexternal link is not a real macro lens. It magnifies up to 1:2, not 1:1 like a real macro lens.

You need the optional Life Size Converter EFexternal link with the 50mm f/2.5 to get 1:1 magnification.


Canon EOS 5D Mark III

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,162,142 views & 57 likes for this thread
Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00156 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is JustyMedia
816 guests, 594 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016