![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central California
Posts: 18
|
I currently own a Canon A95 and for the longest wondered if I should up-grade to a Canon A620. I know the A620 is faster with a bigger mega-pixel[I don't buy into the bigger is better mega-pixel hype, so please don't assume that's what I'm after], but is the picture quality that much better?
I love my A95's picture performance, but I hate the shutter lag on it...especially when comparing it to my friend's W-5 Sony 5.1 mega-pixel digi cam. I"m also curious if the A620 doesn't showcase as much purple fingering and over-blown highlights as the Canon A95. I'm also into macro photography and was wondering if that 4X optical would help me magnify the objects better? I'm really in dire need of some opinions/answers. Please,any feed back would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
Two of my friends have the A95 and I have the A620. My larger LCD screen is one function they with they had. I don't get any purple fringing but sometimes the highlights are over blown. The flash sucks. It is faster and and the macro is great. If you are going to upgrade though I would go for the Rebel XT (I wish I had).
__________________
*NEW! Canon 40D | Canon EF 24-70mmm f/2.8 L USM | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | Canon 430 EX Flash | 20" iMac + Photoshop CS3 www.flickr.com/photos/shanni |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
if your not ready for the dslr jump yet, have you looked at the canon s2--price is dropping since the s3 just released, though I don't see the upgrades to that camera warranted in price.
I think the s2 and 620 are comparable--the s2 is slightly larger, however it has 12x zoom and IS--which is handy for macro
__________________
Polarize This! ----- Canon s2 IS l Canon Rebel 2000 l Kodak v550 canon ef 35-80 f4 l tamron 75-300 f4-5.6 52mm CPL l 52mm ND 8 l 52mm Yellow 12 l 62mm Yellow 12 Raynox .66 WA-Converter CS1 |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Central California
Posts: 18
|
I wanted to get a Rebel XT or 20D, but I can't afford that right now, so I'm contemplating the A620 to hold me over for atleast a year.
I just want something that will improve the A95's great performance. If there's any other advantages, I would like to know from personal experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
I think the S2 IS or the new S3 coming out are in between the A620 and Rebel, might be worth looking into. I'm not sure the A620 will be a big enough jump up to satisfy you.
__________________
*NEW! Canon 40D | Canon EF 24-70mmm f/2.8 L USM | Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II | Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS | Canon 430 EX Flash | 20" iMac + Photoshop CS3 www.flickr.com/photos/shanni |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| So what is the real deal with this lens? | Bootlegger0173 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 16 | 22nd of July 2007 (Sun) 14:12 |
| Powershot TX1 sounds like the real deal | adnil | Small Compact Digitals by Canon | 21 | 19th of April 2007 (Thu) 16:39 |
| What's the real deal? | Canon30Dguy | Accessories & Storage | 11 | 15th of September 2006 (Fri) 13:40 |
| engagement pics...the real deal | swight | Weddings and Other Family Events | 8 | 17th of May 2006 (Wed) 05:03 |
| monitor and printer calibration - what's the REAL deal? | Rudi | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 5 | 23rd of August 2002 (Fri) 00:54 |