Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > The Business of Photography
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8th of May 2006 (Mon)   #1
ghosh
Member
 
ghosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 874
Default Pic quality

Dear friends
Recently I was asked by a painter to photograph his paintings for copy right purpose. I took all the pics in negative ISO 100. When I developed the photographs I found that all the pics had a different color, though it is some thing that is not visible easily. But some one who is good at recognizing color will find out quickly. Can any one tell me what could have been the "X" factor?

I took all the pics in F5.6 and at 1/60.

I also have one more question
Can a higher F number such as f11 would produce better color in this case as well as in other cases.
__________________
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "POTN is the best." << std::endl;
return 0; }


ghosh is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 8th of May 2006 (Mon)   #2
Longwatcher
obsolete as of this post
 
Longwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Newport News, VA, USA
Posts: 3,903
Default Re: Pic quality

I would have to suspect the reason for the difference in color is the spectral response of the film (or development process) verus the spectral response of human eyes. Meaning the film sees something different then people will.

Also changing f-stop on lens is unlikely to affect color (at least in the manner you need). However a different lens might provide better (or worse) color as some are coated to provide a more accurate color response.

Also the light itself (especially if using artificial light) will affect the final color of the shot, even if it looks correct to your eye.

Lastly I presume you were shooting film. If shooting digital then the sensor will also have an effect on the colors. As some one once said, buying a digital camera is buying into a permanent roll of a specific film type.

Hopes that helps a little bit,
__________________
"Save the model, Save the camera, The Photographer can be repaired"
www.longwatcher.com
1DsMkIII as primary camera with f2.8L zooms and the 85L
http://www.longwatcher.com/photoequipment.htm
Longwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th of May 2006 (Tue)   #3
PhotosGuy
Moderator
 
PhotosGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S. E. Michigan
Posts: 64,368
Default Re: Pic quality

Quote:
I would have to suspect the reason for the difference in color is the spectral response of the film (or development process) verus the spectral response of human eyes.
+ the different spectral response of the pigments used. Maybe + the dufus in the lab who's making the prints?

Film/digital? Lighting setup? Example of the images?

Lots of threads here on copying paintings, but search results don't have a long shelf life, so it's better if you do it yourself.
__________________
FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything...
Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers.
www.FrankCizek.com

Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET!
Have you thought about making your own book? // Need an exposure crutch?
PhotosGuy is online now   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 9th of May 2006 (Tue)   #4
chtgrubbs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,667
Default Re: Pic quality

If your lighting and exposure are consistent, the the problem is with your color printer. When negatives are run through a printing machine the color balance of the negative is scanned by the machine and adjusted automatically, so subjects of varying color balance and composition will cause the machine to adjust the color balance to try to make the overall print. When I shoot items that need consisten color balance, I put a gray card in the first frame and tell the printer to balance on the gray card and print the entire roll with that color balance.
chtgrubbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th of May 2006 (Tue)   #5
ghosh
Member
 
ghosh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 874
Default Re: Pic quality

Thanks every one. I think the problem should have been with the printing person.
__________________
#include <iostream>
int main() {
std::cout << "POTN is the best." << std::endl;
return 0; }


ghosh is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pic quality of SD800/IXUS 850 slicendice Small Compact Digitals by Canon 8 15th of July 2007 (Sun) 11:51
Pic Quality Q.... ItsMike Canon EOS Digital Cameras 5 16th of May 2007 (Wed) 09:39
pic quality??? bmac Canon G-series Digital Cameras 6 22nd of April 2003 (Tue) 15:02
Newbie & S30 Pic quality bluegsr Small Compact Digitals by Canon 1 18th of April 2003 (Fri) 01:40
Best quality pic from s200? ke104 Small Compact Digitals by Canon 3 28th of March 2003 (Fri) 23:25


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:43.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.