LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


The Hierarchy of Spending

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk
Thread started 13 May 2006 (Saturday) 11:26   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
bewaretheblur
Senior Member
bewaretheblur's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
195 posts
Lake Placid, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd love to see everyone's opinion on the Great Order of Wallet Depletion. Where do your priorities lie as far as purchases go, and why?

Please post the order in which you think camera products should be purchased

I'll start. I see it as this:

Lenses > Lighting > Tripod > Body > Bag > Misc. Accessories

Why? Because...

Good lenses will get your photos noticed...
Good lighting will get your photos looking pro...
A good tripod will get you more balanced and versatile...
A good body will get you more efficiency...
A good bag will protect those investments...
Good accessories (cards, diffusers, filters, etc.) will give you longevity...

EDIT: Obviously, we're talking upgrades here... It doesn't do you a whole lot of good to buy a lens before a body. Assume that someone has the basic needs of a dSLR: a beginner body, lens, and memory card.

Post #1, May 13, 2006 11:26:57


Bodies: 1d mkIII, 30D, 20D,
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm, Canon 60mm macro, Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L
Stuff: Canon 580 EXII Flash, Sigma EF-500 DG Super Flash, Gary Fong's Peanut Dish LSII, Manfrotto 3201BPRO legs w/3047 Deluxe 3-way head, Konica Minolta Dimage G600 (P&S)

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
blonde
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
8,405 posts
Boston, MA
[MORE/SHARE]

i'll play:

good body because you need one to actually take the pic
good lenses because they help you get the imagee you want
good tripod because you have to have one to get shaarp results and do night shots
good bag because you need one to carry all our gear without breeaking your back
good accessories because they will help you improve your images
good computer gear because you will spend alot of time working on your images so you want to have the best gear to help you do this (color calibration, good screen, ram etc..)

Post #2, May 13, 2006 12:30:15




LOG IN TO REPLY
cbock
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2005
918 posts
La Mesa, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Good lenses will get your photos noticed...
A good body will get you more efficiency...
Good lighting will get your photos looking pro...
A good tripod will get you more balanced and versatile...
A good bag will protect those investments...
Good accessories (cards, diffusers, filters, etc.) will give you longevity...

Post #3, May 13, 2006 12:59:14


Body: 1DIIn
Canon Glass: 16 - 35 II F2.8L | 24 - 70 F2.8L | 50 II F1.8 | 70 - 200 F2.8L IS | 300 F4L IS
Sigma Glass: 24-60 F2.8 EX DG | 70-200 F2.8 EX DG HSM APO | 30 F1.4 EX DC HSM
Other Stuff: Canon 580 EX II | Vivitar 285HV | Manfrotto 679B & 488RC0 | StarFlash 650 & 300

LOG IN TO REPLY
bewaretheblur
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
bewaretheblur's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
195 posts
Lake Placid, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

a lot of people seem more into bodies than I am... To me, I figure once you're at 8MP with a decent sensor, you can take great pictures... I'm not sure that you could tell a printed photo taken by a rebel apart from a photo taken by 1d (besides the crop)... I see the body as being a convinience thing (features, etc) way down the line. Maybe that's because I have a Rebel XT though... :lol:

Post #4, May 13, 2006 13:43:06 as a reply to cbock's post 43 minutes earlier.


Bodies: 1d mkIII, 30D, 20D,
Lenses: Canon 10-22mm, Canon 60mm macro, Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L
Stuff: Canon 580 EXII Flash, Sigma EF-500 DG Super Flash, Gary Fong's Peanut Dish LSII, Manfrotto 3201BPRO legs w/3047 Deluxe 3-way head, Konica Minolta Dimage G600 (P&S)

LOG IN TO REPLY
willg
Senior Member
willg's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
895 posts
Decatur, IL
[MORE/SHARE]

depends on what you shoot. outdoor photographers don't need nearly as much lighting as a studio photographer and they may want to spend some money on a weather sealed body if they are in extreme situtations. For me, I didn't upgrade any glass, and my pictures have started to look much better just by upgrading to the 5d from the 300d. there are shots that I would never have been able to capture with the 300d that the 5d allows me to catch with ease

Post #5, May 13, 2006 13:44:55


5D, 300D, Tamron 17-35mm f/2.8-4, Canon 70-200mm f/4, 135mm f/2, 24-105mm f/4, 50mm f/1.4, Sigma ef 500 dg super, Canon 580EX
http://www.spideronthe​floor.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Orgnoi1
Senior Member
Orgnoi1's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
211 posts
Upstate NY
[MORE/SHARE]

From where I am its lenses>lenses>lenses... kidding... actually I am at a point in my photography that I may start looking into studio equipment...

Per the body comment...it isnt so much the difference in quality of two *perfect pictures* as much as it is the amount of keepers in a single shoot... that of course is only my opinion...

Post #6, May 13, 2006 13:47:14


TRJ Photography - Canon CPS Member
Berkshire Scenic Railway Museum Staff Photographer
Visable and IR Photography / Canon , Mamiya , Toyo
Are you a photographer in the Northeastern USA? Come visit us! (Click Here)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
blonde
Buck Naked Floozies
blonde's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
8,405 posts
Boston, MA
[MORE/SHARE]

bewaretheblur wrote:
a lot of people seem more into bodies than I am... To me, I figure once you're at 8MP with a decent sensor, you can take great pictures... I'm not sure that you could tell a printed photo taken by a rebel apart from a photo taken by 1d (besides the crop)... I see the body as being a convinience thing (features, etc) way down the line. Maybe that's because I have a Rebel XT though... :lol:

don't forget that alot of people want a different body but not for the MP. for example, i want to buy a 1dmkII next because it has the far better AF system. i could care less about the MP after i printed a 16x20 image from the 4.1mp 1D. people want the 5D not just for the 12 MP but for the FF sensor.

Post #7, May 13, 2006 13:50:52 as a reply to bewaretheblur's post 7 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
lakiluno
slightly jealous
lakiluno's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,895 posts
Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland)
[MORE/SHARE]

Lenses (Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro)
Tripod (Dynatran?)-Monopod?
Lenses (Old MF lenses - M42/Nikon F etc)
Grip
Bag (Small shoulder bag to use when I'm not using my backpack)

Post #8, May 13, 2006 13:51:01


Leo
20D|Tamron 17-50 2.8|Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro|50 1.8|Sigma EF-500 DG Super|
My Photo Galleryexternal link *New* | My Gear List | Backup Photos Easily with Robocopy

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
34,036 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I go lenses first. Glass supercedes anything. You can't go without CF cards and batteries and such so I consider them a necessity, not an upgrade or accessory. Most other stuff, assuming you have a body that attaches to your glass, doesn't matter when you buy and in what order.

Post #9, May 13, 2006 13:54:17


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

LOG IN TO REPLY
storeman
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2005
642 posts
Oldham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Hmmm

Good lenses will get your photos noticed, Not necessarily. I've seen photos by a good professional taken using a mid priced point and shoot camera that are excellent. Not because of the sharpness or colour but simply because of the content and composition. If I had the most expensive body with the most expensive lens I still wouldn't be able to match the photo's that this guy produces. The person behind the camera is the main reason for the result. Being able to see the image before it is shot is the key to reaising a good photograph. Granted, having better equipment will make that task easier but if someone has poor composition skills and takes photos of scenes that just aren't appealing then regardless of the equipment, the photo's won't get noticed.

For me, I suppose the most important purchase I could make would probably be some lessons.

Post #10, May 13, 2006 14:51:38


My Gear List.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Greg ­ P.
Senior Member
Joined May 2006
216 posts
Jersey.
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

The body and lenses are both equally #1, a shotty body with good lenses is no better than a good body with shotty lenses.

storeman wrote:
Hmmm

Good lenses will get your photos noticed, Not necessarily. I've seen photos by a good professional taken using a mid priced point and shoot camera that are excellent. Not because of the sharpness or colour but simply because of the content and composition. If I had the most expensive body with the most expensive lens I still wouldn't be able to match the photo's that this guy produces. The person behind the camera is the main reason for the result. Being able to see the image before it is shot is the key to reaising a good photograph. Granted, having better equipment will make that task easier but if someone has poor composition skills and takes photos of scenes that just aren't appealing then regardless of the equipment, the photo's won't get noticed.

For me, I suppose the most important purchase I could make would probably be some lessons.

and thats pretty much dead on. Its the indian, not the arrow.

Post #11, May 13, 2006 14:53:07




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Jon
Moderator

Cocker Spaniel Mod

Jon's Avatar
Joined Jun 2004
68,204 posts
Bethesda, MD USA
[MORE/SHARE]

With me, it's item-by-item. What do I consider necessary for what I've got coming up, and that I don't currently have on hand. This might be a lens, a body, a tripod, a different bag, or any of a number of things. My B&H Wish List has cards, tripod bushings, tripods, lenses, tripod heads, filters, a film scanner, flash adapters and accessories and lighting tools (meter, Litediscs). Your priorities should go toward whatever will make your next shots come out best, regardless of what equipment category it may fall into.

Post #12, May 13, 2006 15:10:34


Jon
----------
Cocker Spaniels
Maryland and Virginia activities
Image Posting Rules and Image Posting FAQ
Report SPAM, Don't Answer It! (link)
PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED.
PAYPAL GIFT NO LONGER ALLOWED HERE

LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle
Goldmember
Eagle's Avatar
Joined May 2005
4,300 posts
Akron, Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

Body, Lens, Bag, Tripod, Flash, More lenses, and accessories at any time.

You have to have a body first or you don't have anything to put a lens on. Then you have to have one lens or the body is doing you no good. After that it is really up to each individual and how you want to use the camera.

This would be for someone new to SLR's.

Already have an SLR it would depend what you already own and what you are trying to accomplish.

Post #13, May 13, 2006 20:52:43 as a reply to Jon's post 5 hours earlier.


7D ■ 10-22 ■ 15-85 ■ 28-135 ■ Σ 50-150 ■ 70-200 f4L ■ 100-400L ■ 580EX II
Gear-PCSmugMugexternal link ShutterStockexternal link Alamyexternal link Eagle's Nest Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Eagle
Goldmember
Eagle's Avatar
Joined May 2005
4,300 posts
Akron, Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

And what your last purchase was.

Post #14, May 13, 2006 20:53:41 as a reply to Eagle's post 58 seconds earlier.


7D ■ 10-22 ■ 15-85 ■ 28-135 ■ Σ 50-150 ■ 70-200 f4L ■ 100-400L ■ 580EX II
Gear-PCSmugMugexternal link ShutterStockexternal link Alamyexternal link Eagle's Nest Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tandem
Goldmember
Tandem's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
1,244 posts
Colorado Springs
[MORE/SHARE]

What came first, the body or the lens? ;)

My main interest is in sports photography. A good body and great lenses are a must. Sure you can get good shots with a lesser body and mediocre lenses, but it's like bringing a knife to a gunfight - you'll lose far more than you'll win.

True, a seasoned veteran can outshoot me with lesser equipment through knowledge of composition and the ability to anticipate the shots but that can only come through experience. My results and percentage of keepers increased enormously when I purchased better equipment. At least now when I get a bad shot I know to blame the photographer and not the equipment. :)

Accessories and a bag to carry it all are whatever it takes to get the job done. You either need them or you don't.

Lighting is next. You can still get great shots without great lighting but you limit yourself on what you can shoot.

A tripod is, in my opinion, the least necessary piece of equipment. You can get most shots handheld with the exception of those that require longer shutter speeds. Even so, you can most likely get by with a lower quality tripod.

Post #15, May 14, 2006 10:55:53 as a reply to Eagle's post 14 hours earlier.


Bill - A model needs careful lighting, professional makeup and expensive clothes to look as beautiful as any ordinary woman does to a man who has fallen in love with her.
G10, 5D, 1D2n, 1D3, 1Ds3, 1.4x, 2x / 17-40 f4, 24-105 f4 IS, 70-200 f4, 300 f4 IS / 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8 IS, 200 f2.8, 300 f2.8 IS, 400 f2.8 IS / 35 f1.4, 50 f1.2, 85 f1.2, 85 f1.8, 100 f2.8M 135 f2
http://ColoradoSprings​.SmugMug.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,058 views & 0 likes for this thread
The Hierarchy of Spending
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00083 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
778 guests, 509 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is diegovanetti

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.