![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
|
I think the thread address is so clear
let's post photos of this lens don't post another links, because i have many links of this lens already. Just i like to post and share here rather than just see photos from links. I like to participate here not just keep seeing pics, so let's all share photos from this lens here. Be Honest ![]() |
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
|
i post that before somewhere, i'll post it here again as sample
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h1...4932Medium.jpg |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
|
I like this photo even some of you see it normal and simple
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
|
I'm interested in this as mine should be back from repair in a week or two, i can see what it can do here in the meantime
__________________
Col (short for Colin) 5D+Grip¦24-70L¦50 1.4¦100 2.8 Macro¦Sigma 70-200 EX DG¦430EX |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
|
Quote:
but why most people here or somewhere choose 24-105mm? is it because of focal length or something else? |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 399
|
I chose the 24-70 f/2.8 over the 24-105 soley based on bokeh. I like the bokeh WAY better on the 24-70 as well as the overall light range. I noticed the backgrounds were a touch lighter on the 24-70 and a bit darker on the 24-105. I got to try them both out at the store I shop at which is a great way for you to choose which one you prefer. The extra focal length and image stabilization would have been nice but that's why I've got legs and steady hand.
![]()
__________________
Hector CANON [EOS 40D] [BG-E2N Grip] CANON [24-70mm ƒ/2.8L] [85mm ƒ/1.2L MarkII] [100-400mm ƒ/4.5-5.6L] [100mm Macro ƒ/2.8L] CANON [430ex Speedlight x2] [ST-E2 Speedlight Transmitter] |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
|
A number of things really, many people don't want or need the extra aperture and they feel the IS more than makes up for it (i agree with that depending on how it's used of course) also the extra focal length and similar IQ make the 24-104 the better option.
I can't speak for everyone but that's how i see it, i was going to get one until my 24-70 fell into my lap at a price i couldn't refuse.
__________________
Col (short for Colin) 5D+Grip¦24-70L¦50 1.4¦100 2.8 Macro¦Sigma 70-200 EX DG¦430EX |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Admin Dane"Nobody is safe!"
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark.
Posts: 20,610
|
Some of mine
![]() http://photo.klein-jensen.dk/photoht...ndtrainer1.jpg http://photo.klein-jensen.dk/photoht...ndtrainer2.jpg ![]() http://photo.klein-jensen.dk/photoht...al_day2_02.jpg http://photo.klein-jensen.dk/photoht...al_day2_03.jpg
__________________
Best Regards Tommy My Photos -=- about.me -=- My Facebook, if you add me please send me a pm also GAPS Africa I 2007 photos -=- GAPS Africa II 2008 photos -=- GAPS Africa IV 2011 photos -=- GAPS = Great African Photo Safari My marketplace feedback click here. IMPORTANT: Image posting rules updated - please read. "PERSONAL MESSAGING REGARDING SELLING OR BUYING ITEMS WITH MEMBERS WHO HAVE NO POSTS IN FORUMS AND/OR WHO YOU DO NOT KNOW FROM FORUMS IS HEREBY DECLARED STRICTLY STUPID AND YOU WILL GET BURNED." |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
|
Quote:
nice shot is this with 24-70L or you use 24-105 IS? i agree that 24-70L is enough over that 24-105 |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 399
|
Quote:
__________________
Hector CANON [EOS 40D] [BG-E2N Grip] CANON [24-70mm ƒ/2.8L] [85mm ƒ/1.2L MarkII] [100-400mm ƒ/4.5-5.6L] [100mm Macro ƒ/2.8L] CANON [430ex Speedlight x2] [ST-E2 Speedlight Transmitter] |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
|
Quote:
nice shot you got good time, place and events, we don't |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 191
|
__________________
40D Canon 10-22mm Canon 24-70mm/2.8L Canon 70-200mm/2.8 IS L www.fotop.net/Glyyde |
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chino Hills
Posts: 2,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
"I am very lazy, a normal consumer"
|
cool.
keep going people, i like this lens because of your photos |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 888
|
boo!
![]()
__________________
.....::....:..:..:::.::....:::..::....:.:.:::.... >glowie loves you >my Flickr •The Anti-HDR Movement• |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Help! Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM Lens or EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM? | ldibo | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 22 | 30th of June 2011 (Thu) 00:46 |
| Canon 28-70mm f2.8 L USM vs. Canon 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 USM IS | MPG Photography | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 23 | 28th of November 2010 (Sun) 23:03 |
| Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX VERSUS Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 L USM EF Lens | verty | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 16 | 2nd of August 2006 (Wed) 18:47 |
| canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM | AustinPhotoNet | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 9 | 23rd of December 2002 (Mon) 09:46 |