Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk
Thread started 02 Jun 2006 (Friday) 17:23
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

100-400L IS or 400 prime for sports?

 
steved110
Cream of the Crop
steved110's Avatar
5,776 posts

Joined Dec 2005

East Sussex UK
MORE INFO

Lord_Malone wrote:
Man. Damn nice shot. It just became my desktop wallpaper.

Great avatar Lord_Malone! Y'all got some Billy Bob teeth too, I see. I like em so much, I have 2 sets....
Just never grew up.....:p

Jun 03, 2006 16:19 as a reply to post 1580162

Canon 6D
Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro
CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L Canon EF 24-70 f/4 IS L and 70-200 f/4 L :D
Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lord_Malone
Cream of the Manpanties........ Inventor Great POTN Photo Book
Lord_Malone's Avatar
7,684 posts

Joined Oct 2005
MORE INFO

steved110 wrote:
Great avatar Lord_Malone! Y'all got some Billy Bob teeth too, I see. I like em so much, I have 2 sets....
Just never grew up.....:p

Actually, I've got the "Big Cletus" teeth. Brought to you by the same folks who brought us the Billy Bobs. ;)

Jun 04, 2006 19:18 as a reply to steved110's post 1 day earlier.

~Spaceships Don't Come Equipped With Rear View Mirrors~
http://www.myspace.com​/chocolate_thaiexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
DavidEB
Goldmember
DavidEB's Avatar
3,117 posts

Joined Feb 2005

North Carolina
MORE INFO

A dissenting opinion -- shooting sports with an f5.6 lens is not a great choice, unless you're sure you're going to have great light at every event. I'm thinking about it for surfing, but for most field events (baseball, soccer, etc...) you really benefit from aperature, because you need a fast shutter to freeze the action. Also, I've found few sports where a lens longer than 300 is really needed. If you need something longer than a 70-200 for your action, I'd vote for the 300 f4, the sigma 100-300 f4, or (best if you can afford it) the sigma 120-300 f2.8.

Putting a teleconverter on a 70-200 is OK but slows the autofocus enough to make sports shots difficult.

Jun 04, 2006 19:29

David
my stuff - [URL="http://www.pbase​.com/davideb"]my gallery - [URL="http://photograp​hy-on-the.net/forum/showpost​.php?p=3928125&postcou​nt=1"]go Rats!

LOG IN TO REPLY

2,424 views & 0 likes for this thread
100-400L IS or 400 prime for sports?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00138 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is nbokas
647 guests, 667 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015