Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 18 Jun 2006 (Sunday) 22:18
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 USM

 
jbkalla
Goldmember
jbkalla's Avatar
2,831 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Aurora, Colorado, USA
Jun 18, 2006 22:18 |  #1

Oft-hailed as the crappiest (is that a word?) lens Canon has ever made! Still, I own one and would like to see what others have gotten out of theirs!

I'll start: I took this out my window tonight (18 June 2006)

ISO 200, Shutter 1/2000, f/5.0, 155mm.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://kalla.net/pictu​res/IMG_1618.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

John
flickrexternal link | G+external link | Panoramioexternal link | InterfaceLIFTexternal link
Canon 5D III
| 16-35 f2.8L II | 70-200mm f/2.8L | 40mm f/2.8 STM | 300mm f/4L IS
Fujifilm X-T1 | 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
jbkalla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
jbkalla's Avatar
2,831 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Aurora, Colorado, USA
Jun 18, 2006 22:20 |  #2

PS... I might also add that USM on this lens is quite slow! Not too quiet, either. My 18-55mm USM is much faster.


John
flickrexternal link | G+external link | Panoramioexternal link | InterfaceLIFTexternal link
Canon 5D III
| 16-35 f2.8L II | 70-200mm f/2.8L | 40mm f/2.8 STM | 300mm f/4L IS
Fujifilm X-T1 | 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
jbkalla's Avatar
2,831 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Aurora, Colorado, USA
Jun 18, 2006 22:32 as a reply to jbkalla's post |  #3

Same pic at ISO 100, 1/800sec, f/5.0, 75mm.


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://kalla.net/pictu​res/IMG_1620.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

John
flickrexternal link | G+external link | Panoramioexternal link | InterfaceLIFTexternal link
Canon 5D III
| 16-35 f2.8L II | 70-200mm f/2.8L | 40mm f/2.8 STM | 300mm f/4L IS
Fujifilm X-T1 | 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
jbkalla's Avatar
2,831 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Aurora, Colorado, USA
Jun 19, 2006 08:59 |  #4

Yikes! Am I the only one out there using this lens? I know there are others out there with this guilty secret! :-)


John
flickrexternal link | G+external link | Panoramioexternal link | InterfaceLIFTexternal link
Canon 5D III
| 16-35 f2.8L II | 70-200mm f/2.8L | 40mm f/2.8 STM | 300mm f/4L IS
Fujifilm X-T1 | 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

LOG IN TO REPLY
GyRob
Cream of the Crop
9,924 posts
Joined Feb 2005
N.E.LINCOLNSHIRE UK.
Jun 19, 2006 09:19 |  #5

would love to join in but mine was so rubish i gave it away - to be honest i think on this type of shot Most Lenses would do the job even the 75/300 ;)
Rob.


"The LensMaster Gimbal"
http://www.lensmaster.​co.uk/rh1.htmexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tundrasport
Senior Member
Tundrasport's Avatar
275 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Boca Raton, Florida
Jun 19, 2006 10:00 as a reply to jbkalla's post |  #6

Slow, noisy, hunts around a bit, but I still love mine! It took me awhile to learn to use this lens but I think you can get some great results! I was going to sell it after I purchassed my 100-400L, and really there is no camparison. I decieded to keep it for those situations, like Mud Fest, iffy weather, don't want to stand out too much etc. 170 mm 1/1000 f5.6

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

I Shoot...Therefore I Chimp
30D, 20D 18-55 kit,100-400L IS USM, EFS 17-85 IS USM, EFS 10-22, nifty 50, 75-300IS USM
http://www.photoraton.​comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
loosecannon
Member
43 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Jun 19, 2006 10:00 |  #7

Taken with 75-300 IS, a much maligned lens

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
jbkalla's Avatar
2,831 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Aurora, Colorado, USA
Jun 19, 2006 10:28 |  #8

Nice pics!

I've all but decided to eventually get the Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 Macro, but I won't be able to afford it for awhile! :-(

Guess I'll only use the zoom on those super-sunny days!


John
flickrexternal link | G+external link | Panoramioexternal link | InterfaceLIFTexternal link
Canon 5D III
| 16-35 f2.8L II | 70-200mm f/2.8L | 40mm f/2.8 STM | 300mm f/4L IS
Fujifilm X-T1 | 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

LOG IN TO REPLY
jj1987
Goldmember
1,398 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Florida
Jun 19, 2006 10:32 |  #9

We could all blur our images from the 100-400 or 70-200 and post them for you?

Just trying to help.




LOG IN TO REPLY
lomond
Goldmember
lomond's Avatar
2,366 posts
Joined Apr 2004
Ayrshire, Scotland
Jun 19, 2006 10:53 as a reply to jj1987's post |  #10

75-300 IS owner and not ashamed to say so. ( I still include it in my sig )
Obviously not the sharpest tool in the box but I've managed some keepers.
This is a 100% crop on a nice summers day on Lake Windermere ( the lens does needs the light ).
Haven't used it for a long time. :o

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com ...s/v488/lomond/Jet-Ski.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO


Hated the lens creep. :evil:

Cameron........My Imagesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
delhi
Goldmember
delhi's Avatar
2,483 posts
Joined Feb 2005
3rd Rock from the Sun
Jun 19, 2006 11:26 |  #11

I dunno. I picked this lens up as an emergency. I'm going to return it however. I much prefer the Sigma APO which I tried. It's not like it's bad, but it could've been better.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Content warning: script


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Content warning: script

Vancouver Portrait Photographerexternal link
No toys. Just tools.external link :lol:

5d3/1dx AF Guidebook | What AF Points to use for my 5d3/1dx?!external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
zacker
Cream of the Crop
zacker's Avatar
6,005 posts
Joined Jan 2005
Oxford, CT.
Jun 19, 2006 11:29 |  #12

i got rid of mine because it was soo slow. It did take some ok shots though.

IMAGE: http://zacker.smugmug.com/photos/54349339-L.jpg
-zacker-

http://www.theanimalha​ven.comexternal link
My Facebook, Friend me If you want!http://www.facebook.co​m/brokenfencephotograp​hyexternal link

http://www.facebook.co​m/theanimalhaven?ref=t​sexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
blueroioq
Junior Member
21 posts
Joined Aug 2005
Jun 19, 2006 12:19 as a reply to zacker's post |  #13

75-300 III usm
slow but this is all i have at this focal :)
1/250s f/5.6 260mm iso 1600
100% crop, parameter2 with a high pass layer
saved for web in ps 80% quality

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.



LOG IN TO REPLY
jbkalla
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
jbkalla's Avatar
2,831 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Aurora, Colorado, USA
Jun 21, 2006 15:17 |  #14

Nice shots, everyone!

I think my next purchases will have to be the 70-200mm f/2.8L and then the 17-40L. I've got to get some better glass!


John
flickrexternal link | G+external link | Panoramioexternal link | InterfaceLIFTexternal link
Canon 5D III
| 16-35 f2.8L II | 70-200mm f/2.8L | 40mm f/2.8 STM | 300mm f/4L IS
Fujifilm X-T1 | 10-24 f4 R OIS | 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR | 16-55mm f/2.8 R LM WR | 56mm f/1.2 R | 27mm f/2.8 Pancake |  Retina iMac & MBP

LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
picturecrazy's Avatar
8,552 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Alberta, CANADA
Jun 21, 2006 15:40 as a reply to jbkalla's post |  #15

I don't think this lens deserves all the bad rap it gets. I have the 75-300, and I paid $100 for it. It is under $200 new. It does a FANTASTIC job for $200, more than you could ask for.

IMAGE: http://yoonl.brinkster.net/misc/birds/b3.jpg

IMAGE: http://yoonl.brinkster.net/misc/birds/b4.jpg

-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photographyexternal link
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographersexternal link
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographersexternal link
Facebookexternal link | Twitterexternal link |Instagramexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

94,950 views & 1 like for this thread
Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00097 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is photopass92
945 guests, 599 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016