Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > The POTN Lounge
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29th of June 2006 (Thu)   #1
KennyG
Goldmember
 
KennyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 2,252
Default Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

For all the happy snappers that like to hang out at Druids it looks as though you will either have to be 8ft tall or have a cherry picker to get a decent view. New debris fencing, car parking for emergency vehicles, taller Armco, fencing attached to the Armco, all designed to keep cars away from joe public and improve marshal safety.

Anyone that goes this weekend, how about posting a few shots of the changes.
__________________
Ken

Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.
KennyG is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 29th of June 2006 (Thu)   #2
peacock
Senior Member
 
peacock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Hampshire , South Coast UK
Posts: 1,919
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

I was following the thread about it on 10/tenths and made a brief mention of it in general chat here, guess the motorsort guys dont get in there much I'm planning on going for tomorrows practice ,so hopefully I will post pics of the changes .
__________________
Just started populating a site with snaps @
www.3cakes.co.uk
peacock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th of June 2006 (Fri)   #3
Cadwell
Moderator
 
Cadwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 7,333
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

No, Jonathon Palmer is to blame. When it comes right down to it, it's his circuit and he carries the can.

I know you like the man, Ken, and think that he's done some good things but from my perspective as a paying spectator it has been mostly negative.
__________________
Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport/Canoe Polo/Other Stuff

Last edited by Cadwell : 30th of June 2006 (Fri) at 04:07.
Cadwell is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 30th of June 2006 (Fri)   #4
KennyG
Goldmember
 
KennyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 2,252
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

JP is actually quite a nice guy when you chat to him off line, and he has turned around four race circuits that could have ended up as industrial parks or housing developments. That aside I don't agree with everything that MSV has done, even from my side of the fences.

They are under pressure from certain race series and the FIA to make the changes or they simply won't be able to host the events. Cadwell isn't immune either, as they have put up a catch fence on the outside of the hairpin for the safety of bike riders. I am not sure which is better if you get thrown off your bike, slamming into a very sturdy catch fence or landing in a corn field. It has ruined one of the classic Cadwell shots. Goodness knows what will happen to Snetterton over the winter when they start the re-work to make it FIA category 2 standard (same as Brands). I can see catch fences appearing everywhere. Even Oulton had to install pit lane safety fencing to meet regulations, and after the death of the marshal at Lodge I can forsee changes in that area of the track as well.

Unfortunately if any circuit wants to hold high profile events they are governed by two things - the FIA and the TV companies and you have to bow to their demands if you want to host them. The problem comes when these extra "safety" features get in the way of club or national events where they are not a requirement.

The only alternative is not to hold these events and simply run club and national meetings, putting everything else onto Silvertsone and Donington. I don't suppose that would go down well either. MSV and JP are in a no-win situation.
__________________
Ken

Professional Motorsport Photographer
2 x 1D MK-II, 7D, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L,
300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC.
KennyG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th of July 2006 (Sun)   #5
PeteDyer
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 415
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

But on the other side its thanks to JP we get the chance to see higher quality motorsport such as DTM and the A1 GP.
PeteDyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th of July 2006 (Sun)   #6
Dave_G
Goldmember
 
Dave_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
Posts: 3,621
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteDyer
But on the other side its thanks to JP we get the chance to see higher quality motorsport such as DTM and the A1 GP.
All of once a year.
__________________
Skoda Fabia vRS SE| Don't make a 70-200 thread | Pan Master™ © Allen Mead | Skodalover |Hippopotomonstrosesquippedaliophobia- Fear of long words... | now with 17s, a turbo, rear tints, dual climate, cruise... must be a new company car
Dave_G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th of July 2006 (Sun)   #7
FlashZebra
This space available
 
FlashZebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 4,313
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyG
For all the happy snappers that like to hang out at Druids it looks as though you will either have to be 8ft tall or have a cherry picker to get a decent view. New debris fencing, car parking for emergency vehicles, taller Armco, fencing attached to the Armco, all designed to keep cars away from joe public and improve marshal safety.

Anyone that goes this weekend, how about posting a few shots of the changes.
What might an "Armco" be?

I grew up in a town with an "Armco" steel mill (American Rolling Mill Corp.), possible it might be related, but most likely not.

Dictionary.com was stumped also.

In any case, I need a bit of help to understand this post.

Enjoy! Lon
FlashZebra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30th of July 2006 (Sun)   #8
ron chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
 
ron chappel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
Posts: 3,552
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyG
....They are under pressure from certain race series and the FIA to make the changes or they simply won't be able to host the events.
That's it.


Of course one could carry the argument further and say that the FIA is arbitrarilly deciding what protection we need based on fear of lawsuits or an argument could be made that judges shouldn't be allowed to give massive payouts that lead to the whole problem....

Last edited by ron chappel : 30th of July 2006 (Sun) at 22:11.
ron chappel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of July 2006 (Mon)   #9
PeteDyer
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 415
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave_G
All of once a year.
Alot better than having to stomp round europe to see the best motorsport can offer (bar F1)
PeteDyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of July 2006 (Mon)   #10
Woolburr
Mr. PMS Himself
 
Woolburr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
Posts: 65,364
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by londuck
What might an "Armco" be?

I grew up in a town with an "Armco" steel mill (American Rolling Mill Corp.), possible it might be related, but most likely not.

Dictionary.com was stumped also.

In any case, I need a bit of help to understand this post.

Enjoy! Lon
ARMCO Steel made the most popular form of American guard rail for a number of years. That same system is in place at many race circuits around the world. An example can be seen here....ARMCO Barrier Photo
__________________
People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons, Coloring Book, Refrigerator Art and What I Really Think About

Last edited by Woolburr : 31st of July 2006 (Mon) at 05:13.
Woolburr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of July 2006 (Mon)   #11
chris clements
Senior Member
 
chris clements's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: this scepter'd isle (bottom right corner)
Posts: 1,644
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by londuck
What might an "Armco" be?
The crash barriers on most UK motorways and circuits.

Interesting that the manufacturer's name hasn't stuck in his own country.
Perhaps we'll learn next that in the US all vacuum cleaners aren't generically called "Hoovers" !!
chris clements is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of July 2006 (Mon)   #12
Cadwell
Moderator
 
Cadwell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 7,333
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Before we paint JP as the saviour of British motorsport let’s get a few facts straight.

Brands Hatch was never in danger of being turned into housing or an industrial estate. Planning and environmental regulations meant that was out of the question as the Fouldsons found out when they tried to upgrade the circuit to host the British GP, not to mention the fuss the local residents put up about the thought of more housing. That rumour only started when Octagon/Interpublic had “talks” with a tame industrial developer in order to try and push the price up during the sale of the circuits. Everyone knew it was a sham.

The Indy circuit at Brands Hatch did not need to be modified to meet FIA Grade 2. The whole circuit at Brands including the GP loop already was. It had to be for A1 GP and it had to be for the London Champ Car Trophy several years before. The GP loop did need minor upgrading to cope with A1 GP.

Nice Dr. Palmer is the man who has decided to charge over 12s full adult admission to the circuits (as opposed to over 16s previously and everywhere else). He is the man who has abolished cheap concession access for the disabled and pensioners. He is the man who has increased the price of season tickets by over 100% in two years. He is the man who now charges me extra to park where I have been parking free for years.

A1 GP and DTM would still run in the UK if Brands remained unmodified. They might insist on running at Donington or Silverstone but so be it.

Drivers, spectators, marshals and photographers all dislike Silverstone and Donington. They have no atmosphere, you’re remote from the track and they’re unpleasant. JP seems determined to turn Brands and his other circuits into carbon copies of them in pursuit of improving his own bank balance. Now, I don’t blame him for that… he’s a businessman but please, please don’t tell me he’s doing it for the love of British motorsport.
__________________
Glenn
My Pictures: Motorsport/Canoe Polo/Other Stuff
Cadwell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of July 2006 (Mon)   #13
Swaffs
Goldmember
 
Swaffs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 4,443
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

I was there at the weekend (inside the fence fortunately), but having spoken to people on Sat evening, the changes at druids were to have a space available so they could crane cars out of the gravel and into a safe area, and keep the racing going. They had to put the new fence around the re-landscaped area. which has extended the area at the entrance to the corner. It wasn't done to annoy the public, or restrict viewing. Unfortunately I don't have any pics of the area to hand.

It also means there is a proper gate now at the marshals post to get to the outside of druids!

Rich Swaffs
Swaffs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of July 2006 (Mon)   #14
PeteDyer
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 415
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

What about JP bring Snetterton up to FIA Grade 2?
PeteDyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st of July 2006 (Mon)   #15
FlashZebra
This space available
 
FlashZebra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 4,313
Default Re: Changes at Brands - DTM to blame?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woolburr
ARMCO Steel made the most popular form of American guard rail for a number of years. That same system is in place at many race circuits around the world. An example can be seen here....ARMCO Barrier Photo
Thank you.

Enjoy! Lon
FlashZebra is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Brands DTM - better late than never! pumaknight Motorsports 8 24th of June 2007 (Sun) 09:40
DTM @ Brands Hatch scooby nutt Motorsports 1 11th of June 2007 (Mon) 11:59
DTM comes to brands itsafastworld85 Motorsports 19 10th of June 2007 (Sun) 04:31
Another take on DTM at Brands Hatch Robert C Motorsports 2 8th of June 2007 (Fri) 16:35
Frustration at Brands Hatch - DTM pumaknight Motorsports 21 8th of July 2006 (Sat) 15:26


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.