![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 14,649
|
There's not really a question here, but I wanted share a few observations about this lens. I just purchased it last week and I have used it thus far for a glamour shoot with a new model and for photographing a large festival. I have the option of returning it within 30 days, but after these two shoots I'm definitely keeping the lens.
Here's what I like about it: 1. It's much lighter than my 28-70 f2.8L and although I haven't done any critical testing, it seems to be as sharp as, if not sharper than that lens as well. 2. The 28-70 always left me feeling short of reach at fairs/festivals, but using the 70-200 f2.8L was just too large and heavy of a lens to carry for hours on end, plus I couldn't go wide at all. The 24-105 focal length was perfect for the crowds, the festive groups of people, and for reaching out a isolating an individual. I've always liked that focal range, but I never cared for the quality of my 28-105 USM lens when compared to my L lenses. 3. The lens quite sharp, even wide open. The IS is almost silent, and there's very little vibration. It's sometimes tough to tell that it has kicked in. But, I can tell that it makes a significant difference. 4. The color quality of the lens is consistent with my other L's, and the bokeh at f4 is better than I expected. What I didn't like: Actually, I can't think of anything right now. If this lens hadn't performed to meet my needs/expectations I was fully prepared to return it for a refund. I had read quite a lot of good reviews about the lens on this forum and others, and I'm pleased to say that the lens lives up to its well deserved reputation. If anyone is interested, I'll post a few shots from the fair later. Mark
__________________
Mark ----- Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies. Thirty-two years of shooting and still learning. My G&N Blog (NSFW)- My Complete Gear List - Mac-Photo Website G&N FORUM EARLY ACCESS & IMAGE POSTING RULES |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
It's a great lens, just doesn't go quite wide enough for my tastes as a main walk about lens. But I'd love to own one.
__________________
20D, Eos 100 Canon EF-S 18-55 IS, Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 , Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro CanonEF 17-40 f/4 L and 70-200 f/4 L Speedlite 580EX and some bags'n pods'n stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 25
|
Thanks for the mini review! I am planning to get the 24-105 as a walkaround lens. I would love to see some shots. I have a question tho, do you know how it behaves as a walkaround lens on a crop camera? i have a 350D, and was wondering if an L lens on my camera is worth it.
Thanks. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#5 |
|
we over look the simplest things
|
Also, how does this all differ on the different cameras you have? EOS3, 20D, 1DMII
__________________
David 5D | (2) 550EX | 17-40L | Tammy 28-75 2.8 | 28-135 | 50/1.8 | 85/1.8 | 70-200L IS Sigma 18-125 | (4)AB B400 | Load of Pentax M42's |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 2,918
|
Well said about this lens, I couldn't be happier with mine!
__________________
Canon 5D Canon 40D - Infrared Modified (www.lifepixel.com) Canon Lenses: 17-40, 24-105 f/4 IS, 100 2.8 Macro, TS-E 90, 70-200 f/4 IS, 100-400 IS Canon EF25 II , EF 1.4x II Smith & Wesson M&P 340CT .357 Magnum |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
I also use the 24-105 as my walk around lens, it's a great focal length for FF cameras.
__________________
1DmkIII and some lenses |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Huntsville, AL USA
Posts: 381
|
It is perfect for FF, in fact it was released with the 5D in mind
__________________
Canon G7 & SD800 IS |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Billy the kid
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Miami and/or Islamorada, FL
Posts: 5,995
|
it may be born for the 5D, but i also find it has done a terrific job on my 20D. still pull out my 17-40 when i am doing landscapes. but for daily use, and when i dont want to haul all my gear around, it hasnt really let me down yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 14,649
|
Quote:
Quote:
Mark
__________________
Mark ----- Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies. Thirty-two years of shooting and still learning. My G&N Blog (NSFW)- My Complete Gear List - Mac-Photo Website G&N FORUM EARLY ACCESS & IMAGE POSTING RULES |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 14,649
|
Quote:
An L lens is an L lens no matter what camera it's attached to, so if it's good on a 1DMKII, it will be just as good on a 350D, but with a different FOV. Mark
__________________
Mark ----- Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies. Thirty-two years of shooting and still learning. My G&N Blog (NSFW)- My Complete Gear List - Mac-Photo Website G&N FORUM EARLY ACCESS & IMAGE POSTING RULES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 14,649
|
__________________
Mark ----- Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies. Thirty-two years of shooting and still learning. My G&N Blog (NSFW)- My Complete Gear List - Mac-Photo Website G&N FORUM EARLY ACCESS & IMAGE POSTING RULES |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Goldmember
|
Does a great job on a 20D
Candid indoor Bridal Portrait ![]() Forth Road Bridge, Scotland ![]() Darling Harbour, Sydney ![]()
__________________
All My Gear 40D, 20D + Grips| 10-22 f3.5-4.5 | 24-105 f4L IS | 70-200 f2.8L IS | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f1.8 | 100 f2.8 | 300 f4L IS | 1.4x MkII | Tamron 17-35 f2.8-4 | 28-75 f2.8 | 580EX | EF500 DG Super | Lightsphere II | Stofen Diffuser | P-2000 |Manfroto 055 ProB Tripod w/488RC4 Head | R2400 | C900 | Nova 5 AW | Mini Trekker AW |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Goldmember
|
I've got a 30D and love it.
Sometimes I wish it had more "speed" than F4... but it hasn't let me down. Indoors I match it with a speedlight and get some very nice results (IMO). It works well... and "YES" to the earlier question about whether L glass is worth it on an XT. Most people will tell you to buy glass first. Personally, I'd recommend a speedlight first (even if you don't do much indoor shots--fill flash), then glass, then body (as you grow out of it). Plus, glass holds value well.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: So. CA
Posts: 2,332
|
I'm going to buy this lens this week because I need the minimal focusing distance that it offers for product work.
I've done a lot of research on this lens, and it appears that there are only two major opinions about its performance. A. It's the best lens in the bag. Period! Excellent sharpness, color and contrast. As good as any L! B. It doesn't even compare to the 18-55mm kit lens. It has horrible vignetting at 24mm and horrible CA and purple fringing. It is soft on the edges and corners. It is very soft at 105mm. I sure hope I end up with a lens that falls into group A!!!
__________________
Canon 5D MkII | Canon 20D l Canon EF 50mm II f/1.8 l Canon EFS 17-85mm IS l Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM l Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 L IS l Canon EF 24-105mm 4.0 L l Canon EF 100 2.8 MACRO l Canon 580EXII | Canon 580EX | Canon G3 l White Lightning lighting | and a whole boatload of other stuff |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Which is a better walk around lens? | jeffylicious | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 5 | 5th of March 2007 (Mon) 12:52 |
| walk-around lens | greygoose | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 12 | 15th of November 2006 (Wed) 22:28 |
| Walk Around Lens | Packhorse-4 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 23 | 14th of July 2006 (Fri) 11:23 |
| walk around lens | mikehea28 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 19 | 1st of December 2005 (Thu) 21:10 |