Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
Thread started 12 Nov 2003 (Wednesday) 09:48
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Mini review Tamron AF SP 28-75/2.8 XR Di LD Asf. IF MACRO mo

 
J.A.F. ­ Doorhof
Goldmember
3,242 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Emmeloord, The Netherlands
     
Nov 12, 2003 09:48 |  #1

After thinking alot about the need for a replacement for my not so bad Sigma 28-105f2.8-4 I decided to take the gamble and went looking for a new lens in the f2.8 segment with a limit on my budget of € 500,00 (the sigma was € 279,00).

To be honest I decided almost immediatly for the Sigma 28-70 f2.8 EX asp. which was offered second hand for € 349,00, the lens looked really well build and a bit flashy, autofocus is reasonable faster than my 28-105, the downside was the picture quality I could not really say I was wowed by the difference, sure there was a difference but not jawdropping.

As if faith would have it's way my supplier just got the
Tamron AF SP 28-75/2.8 XR Di LD Asf. IF MACRO model A09 in the store, this was also high on my list because it's supposed to be a lens specialy made for digital SLR's and according to some sites and reviews on sharpness it bettered the Canon L version (don't flame me I only write what I know/heard :D).

We decided to attach this new wonder to my 10D, ....:D I walked out with it (after paying).

Impressions
The buildquality is good for as far as I can tell, it's smaller than the Sigma 28-105 or 28-70, the supplied lenshood helps a bit in making it a lens :D.
But it's not alway's size that matters, due to the new specs of DSLR's the lenses can be made smaller without sacrificing quality.

Autofocus appears to be fairly fast, a lot faster than my other lenses (see signature). I never worked with a USM motor so I can't tell the difference there, but for me it's very quick. When focussing really close on my hand to infinity is really within a fraction of a second.

But were it all boils down to is image quality.
I wanted a tacksharp lens, since I use the 70-210f2.8 Sigma APO I have been spoiled rotten with sharpness and lightperformance, only my Tamron 90mm Macro 1:1 gives me something as good. And now I have a third tack sharp lens, because the new Tamron is razor sharp.

This shot was made with the same camera in a timelapse of a few seconds, it's a 1:1 crop of the original RAW unprocessed so this is straight of the camera (I found out later that PS CS RAW does do a little sharpening so take that into account).

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


This was the difference I was looking for, the Tamron is clearly sharper but also when looking at the headlights there is a bit more detail in the lighter areas, but most of all, the Tamron gives a more "real" material look if you know what I mean, it's more not like a picture.

I have to test the lens a bit more to give a definitive result, but because there are not so many reviews on-line at the moment I thought I would write this down as a start.

Greetings,
Frank

www.frankdoorhof.com (external link)
www.frankdoorhof.com/p​ortfolio (external link)
follow me on twitter (external link)
teaching at Photoshop World 2013 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
psk4363
Senior Member
Avatar
720 posts
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Bolton, UK
     
Nov 12, 2003 10:21 |  #2

Yep! The Tamron is clearly the better of the two lenses based on the two comparitive photos you've shown. I think you've made a good choice .... but, did you actively consider the Tokina too?

Cheers,
Barry


A little G9 :D

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J.A.F. ­ Doorhof
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,242 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Emmeloord, The Netherlands
     
Nov 12, 2003 10:32 |  #3

I did,
But I decided for the Tamron because it was a brandnew lens which is primarly aimed at the DSLR market.

Also when comparing the 28-105 with the 28-70f2.8 I had some trouble finding out which one was sharper on my display of the camera, they were both almost the same, with the EX maybe a tack more detailed. The Tamron blew the EX away on the display and on the screen (later) so I decided to go with that one.

Also the salesperson knew the Sigma and Tokina in that series were only a noselength in difference, the Tamron they did not had much experience with, except that it sold really well due to good reviews. They are rather well informed and have alway's given me good advise in what I needed so I did not bother to test the Tokina.

Greetings,
Frank


www.frankdoorhof.com (external link)
www.frankdoorhof.com/p​ortfolio (external link)
follow me on twitter (external link)
teaching at Photoshop World 2013 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tony4563
Member
98 posts
Joined Nov 2002
     
Nov 12, 2003 16:08 |  #4

I love this lens. Sits proudly alongside my Sigma 70-200 EX and my Canon 17-40. Its compact, well made and the image quality is excellent for the money!




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
3,554 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
     
Nov 14, 2003 00:56 |  #5

VERY nice!
You might find the sigma sharpens well in the digital realm but it will allways have that low contrast subtle look.The tamron is spot on and looks very similar to canons' best! A real 'lifelike' look as you say




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
J.A.F. ­ Doorhof
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
3,242 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Emmeloord, The Netherlands
     
Nov 14, 2003 02:24 |  #6

Hi Ron,

The Sigma is no bad performer at all, I used the 28-105f2.8-4 before this and it sharpens indeed very well, however if I have more sharpness to begin with, why not :D. that's alway's better.

Greetings,
Frank


www.frankdoorhof.com (external link)
www.frankdoorhof.com/p​ortfolio (external link)
follow me on twitter (external link)
teaching at Photoshop World 2013 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Andy_T
Compensating for his small ... sensor
9,860 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2003
Location: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
     
Nov 14, 2003 02:40 |  #7

... sounds like a great starting lens for either 10D or 300D users (instead of or in addition to the 18-55 kit lens),
if you want to tack sharp images and don't really need the wide angle.

Regards,
Andy


some cameras, some lenses,
and still a lot of things to learn...
(so post processing examples on my images are welcome :D)
If you like the forum, vote for it where it really counts!
CLICK here for the EOS FAQ
CLICK here for the Post Processing FAQ
CLICK here to understand a bit more about BOKEH

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
Avatar
3,554 posts
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Qld ,Australia
     
Nov 15, 2003 06:22 |  #8

I'm really glad you posted this.I have heard very little about tamron's better lenses lately and seen lots of rather bad results from their cheaper stuff, so i had pretty much given up on them as a serious alternative to canon.This gives me hope again!

I want to like sigma ,i really honestly do,but can't quite bring myself to love the look sigma gives.Sure they can be stunningly sharp at times but.....for some reason they give an effect of 'allmost perfect reality,but somthing isn't quite right'

I wish all lenses were tested online with a good digital body!!!
I'll post lots of examples if i ever get my hands on a 10D/300D




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ChrisNardone
Member
199 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Feb 15, 2004 15:56 |  #9

Waking the dead on this one...

Frank are you still happy with this lens. Anyone else out there have good/bad eperiences with it. When I go to the cupboard to pull out my f/2.8 lenses, the cupboard is bare :cry:




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeraGram93013
Member
139 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Feb 15, 2004 16:20 |  #10

I too, have the Tamron AF SP 28-75/2.8 XR Di LD ASF and it is my primary lens. I love it to pieces. Mine isn't a macro model though. (weep)

I need a macro lens. I need to take bug pictures. (I don't know why.)

The ONLY downside to this lens that I can see is the LOCK.

I keep flipping it on and forgetting about it and then wonder why my camera isn't focusing.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Malaxos1
Senior Member
366 posts
Joined Sep 2003
     
Feb 15, 2004 17:33 |  #11

I agree, it is a great lens. I bought the Tamron 28-75mm a week after getting the D Rebel. I got the Rebel as an upgrade from my Olymus E10. The big thing about the E10 is that the f.2 lens is incredible, therefore I found myself dissapointed with the Rebel's kit lens. The Tamron has served me weel, I used it yesterday at a wedding and it performed nicely...Dean




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sparty314
Member
84 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Feb 22, 2004 21:44 |  #12

I, too, am trying to decide between these lenses. Does anyone else have any experience with both? To my amateur eye, the Sigma lens in Frank's comparison doesn't seem to be focused at the same point as the Tamron. Or, is it just that soft?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
TeraGram93013
Member
139 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Feb 22, 2004 22:22 |  #13

TeraGram93013 wrote:
I too, have the Tamron AF SP 28-75/2.8 XR Di LD ASF and it is my primary lens. I love it to pieces. Mine isn't a macro model though. (weep)

As I was cleaning my lens the other day, I noticed it IS a macro lens.

Learn somethin' new everyday.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jerry ­ C.
Hatchling
3 posts
Joined Jul 2004
     
Aug 22, 2004 02:17 |  #14

I don't want to go against the flow of Tamron praise ...

I don't want to go against the flow of Tamron 28-75 praise, however I would like to be the first (and perhaps only) to post some caveats. I owned a Tamron 28-75 for 2 weeks and shot only two rolls of film, comparing it with another two rolls of film shot with a 50mm/1.8 and a 70-200mm/f4L. These comparisons are in contrast to the posted comparisons with a Sigma 70-200/2.8. The Sigma 28-70/2.8 isn't an adequate comparison to measure lens sharpness. A prime or an incredible zoom must be used (and the Sigma is not an incredible zoom). While I found the Tamron 28-75 to be "pretty good", I could still see a noticeable degradation in sharpness compared to my 50mm or my L zoom ..... IN 4x6 PRINTS! My girlfriend could also see a visible difference. The Sigma and the Tamron may be pretty good, but they are not as good as L zooms, which for the most part are a tad lower optically than the primes. Still, all things considered, the Tamron is a very good value. Just don't get carried away in expectations or praise.

Jerry C.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Olegis
Goldmember
Avatar
2,073 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Apr 2004
Location: Israel
     
Aug 22, 2004 02:30 |  #15

I own the Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 too and I'm very happy with it. It's reasonably sharp at f/2.8 and VERY sharp at f/5.6 and above. As a matter of fact its optical performance is very similar to that of my Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8L at f/5.6 and above.
This lens minimum focussing distance is about 30cm - not very nice for real macro shots, but still very acceptable for occasional flower shots (examples (external link)).


Best wishes,
Oleg.

www.Olegis.com (external link)
My equipment list
'I take orders from no one except the photographers' – Harry S Truman

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

34,672 views & 0 likes for this thread
Mini review Tamron AF SP 28-75/2.8 XR Di LD Asf. IF MACRO mo
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EOS Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is shandesh19
742 guests, 278 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.