![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
Hi all, shot these a while ago and was just playing around with some effects. The young lady's first time in front of a camera. We think she did well. please feel free to c&c. Thanks-Graham-
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
And one more!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
|
I love teh conversion in the second one. Beautiful. What did you do here?
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
Oh...The post processing is fine, maybe a tad more contrast on the B&W...But who cares with a lady so distractingly beautiful ! When I see beauty such as hers which is so far from any atainment I feel like I have fallen into
a mulstrom of hopelessness.........and you have done a superb job of illustrating this beauty....congradulations to you and your work, her and with the bright future in modeling that I see...
__________________
The "eyes" have it ! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
awsome photos, number 2 is my favorite, I think the pp is good
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
I like them both! Though the first one seems to be a bit sharper than second. Like the position of the hair int he first..gives a playful and sexy look!
In the first shot she looks alot like Eva Mendes |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Goldmember
|
They look fine to me. The B&W one is the best.
Art |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
|
They're both great Grahm but choice for me would be No 2.....
Rog
__________________
Roger "All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to us." J.R.R. Tolkein Canon EOS 5D Canon EOS 20D Canon EF 70 - 200mm F/2.8L USM Canon EF 17 - 40mm F/4L USM Canon EF 24 - 70mm F/2.8L USM Canon EF-S 60mm f2.8 Macro USM 580EX Speedlite |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
Both really nice shots. I like No.1 the most. The hair is picking up the copper tones in the skin perfectly.
__________________
5D & Grip, 17-40 f4, 70-200 f2.8 IS, 50mm 1.4, 85mm1.2 580EX 430EX II, Tamron SP AF 90mm f/2.8 Macro. Rickety tripod. Andy Peat ---------------------------------------------- Don't underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Coniston, Ontario
Posts: 587
|
both of these are processed well...however they second image seems a bit softer which works with this image. I would try burning you edges a bit to add a tad of depth to the images. It will make them really POP
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
|
Thanks for the comments everyone. The 2nd conversion (from memory!) was new adj layer> solid colour-pick black- ok> blend mode - colour. Its a good quick way to get a mono look.( You can also play with the opacity to bleed colour back in if you wish.) In this case it's almost an IR feel. However it doesn't work on all images. I guess that's why there are sooo many ways to convert to b&w. #2 does look soft, will have to check the original file, could be resizing or most probably me not quite nailing the focus!
I will pass on the gracious comments to the lady, i'm sure she will be encouraged. Graham |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by 1grayman : 16th of August 2006 (Wed) at 10:07. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Best way to post process this? | Uhland | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 3 | 7th of April 2007 (Sat) 22:58 |
| Post Process | Guineh | Critique Corner | 3 | 18th of January 2007 (Thu) 06:54 |
| did I over post process?? | Coco-Puffs | Nature & Landscapes | 17 | 9th of June 2006 (Fri) 13:07 |
| Post Process or Not? | toyguru | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 4 | 14th of March 2006 (Tue) 00:40 |
| How should I post process this? | MrChevy | Critique Corner | 20 | 28th of May 2004 (Fri) 00:12 |