LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Tokina AF 80-400mm 4.5-5.6 II

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 21 Aug 2006 (Monday) 14:27   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Ok, to give this guy his full name:

Tokina AF 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6 SD AT-X 840AF II

This is a very short initial impressions review. When I first started researching this lens I found very little about the new Mk II version, so maybe this will help someone.

The price gap between the decent cheaper stuff like Sigma 70-300mm APO DG or Canon 100-300mm USM and the mid-range options like the superb Sigma 100-300mm 4.0 EX and 50-500mm 4.0-6.3EX is relatively huge to the average punter/amateur; it's even larger when you next look at the Canon 300mm 4.0 IS L, 400mm 5.6 L and 100-400mm 4.5-5.6 IS L rung of the ladder. I'll leave aside the silly money stuff because I really don't care enough about photography to go there.

So, what are you gonna do? Keep the the cheap stuff or set the wallet alight with the bigger stuff? Well, what I did is take a chance on the brand new mark II version of the Tokina 80-400mm and initial impressions are pretty good :D I'm not gonna pixel peep here because I don't need to. I can already tell it will deliver decent results if I use it well, I ran several length and aperture tests, and it has no 'QA issues' that make me want to return it.

IMAGE: http://www.buzzdns.com/tokidown600.jpg

It's not as good as the L's above, but it is enough of an improvement to make it a great, cost effective upgrade from the cheapo stuff. Jury is out about whether it can compete with the Bigma, but at less than half the price even if it gets close I will be happy.

Build is typically Tokina and so it makes the L's look like the poorer, tho' trendier, relations from just a tad over the tracks. Design is old school for sure so we're losing out a tad in the who's coolest competition, but they are the only lenses than seem as solid as my classic old Zeiss and Pentax gear: think metal rather than plastic. Manual focus isn't L or EX quality but when am I gonna use that really? AF is typically a tad noisy, same as pretty much any none USM/HSM motor system. Who cares? Not me.

You get a pretty Ok lens pouch, built in adjustable tripod mount ring, lens hood, front and rear caps of course (front one is typically Tokina - cheesy!) a user manual, and I also got a free 7 year international Mac warranty. I paid less than £300 new ;-)a

Filter Size is 72mm and, as you can guess from that, this really is an extremely small big boy zoom. You can see size compared against the 24-105mm 4.0 IS L, which is fine in all respects for day to day use. Dimensions (Length x Diameter) 5.4 in. (136mm) x 3.0in. (77.2mm). Weight is also very friendly at 37.0 oz. (1050g). So, if you want length and you want portable, even walkaround style, then this is a real contenter.

Of course, however small and light it may be we only want to carry the thing if the IQ is decent. There are plenty of super-light zoom that suck in that department so luckily my initial findings are favourable, actually better than I expected.

The previous model was well enough liked but probably not loved, with some reports mentioning CA and softness at 400mm. Again, hardly unique in a longer zoom, but we don't really want too much trouble from that kinda stuff. This is a whole new design with new coatings so Tokina have taken things seriously. It's not just a rehash.

This new model doesn't seem to suffer with CA, tho' I haven't pushed it hard and wouldn't normally anyway in real world use. It shows softness wide open at 400mm 5.6 but show me an affordable zoom that doesn't. I generally use a long zoom at f8.0 and by then this one is nice and sharp, requiring only the same two or three pass mild USM as I apply to my 24-105mm IS L shots.

At the opposite extreme is it pretty sharp wide open and firms up at 5.6, even more by 6.3. It's possibly intended for safari use, tho' I'm more likely to get another 50-500mm Bigma for that next year, so f8.0 isn't going to be an issue except for dawn and dusk shooting. Previous experience shows most of my shots aren't taken at those times so I am not concerned.

First shot above shows the 24-105mm 4.0 IS L next to the Tokina 80-400mm II, with the Tokina hood to the right. Second shot below shows both fully extended based on encouragement from a nosey pot plant and Cat. Yes, it is ultra-tiny for the range ;) My eyes nearly popped out when I saw it!

Final shot below is the first one out the camera using typical 'me' long range settings, i.e. 400mm f8.0. I can't be bothered PPing loads of 100% crops. You can believe me or not :p I never print larger than A4 and I know this lens will do fine.

IMAGE: http://www.buzzdns.com/tokiextend600.jpg
IMAGE: http://www.buzzdns.com/car400.jpg

Post #1, Aug 21, 2006 14:27:05


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
lakiluno
slightly jealous
lakiluno's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,895 posts
Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland)
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks! It looks like a good lens. Perhaps something to replace my 70-300 in a few months/years when I have the money (300 is a bit short sometimes :o)

If you do post more shots, could you tell me (take it to the zoo for some real safari practice!!!)

Post #2, Aug 21, 2006 14:36:15


Leo
20D|Tamron 17-50 2.8|Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro|50 1.8|Sigma EF-500 DG Super|
My Photo Galleryexternal link *New* | My Gear List | Backup Photos Easily with Robocopy

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
34,036 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Looks decent at those sizes...at least at f/8...which it should. Surprisingly compact. Thanks for the thorough analysis, although I'm a bit pixel-peeper curious! :)

Post #3, Aug 21, 2006 14:41:31


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

LOG IN TO REPLY
fatdeeman
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2004
322 posts
Wales, formerly southampton UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Very interesting at that price!

Might have a look more closely when I have some money again.

Post #4, Aug 21, 2006 14:52:24 as a reply to cdifoto's post 10 minutes earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/fatdeeman/external link
http://www.lensporn.ne​texternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cjm
Goldmember
cjm's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
4,740 posts
Edmonton, Alberta
[MORE/SHARE]

hmm interesting. Might give it a try someday. Thanks for the info CondyK

Post #5, Aug 21, 2006 15:03:31


Christopher J Martin
Gear: 1D MKIII - 60D - G16 - 24mm f1.4 L
- 24-70mm F2.8 L - 70-200mm IS f2.8 L - 100-400 f4.5-5.6 IS L and more...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
condyk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

lakiluno wrote:
If you do post more shots, could you tell me (take it to the zoo for some real safari practice!!!)

I will take it out on my usual weekend walkaround, if not before. I'll then post some shots. My 15-30mm Ex and 24-105mm IS L are both very consistent performers so this lens has tough competition to live up to. Let's hope he does the business and delivers a good keeper ratio.

cdi-ink.com wrote:
Thanks for the thorough analysis, although I'm a bit pixel-peeper curious! :)

Can't be bothered with that myself. As long as it delivers a good A4 shot.

Post #6, Aug 21, 2006 16:59:25 as a reply to lakiluno's post 2 hours earlier.


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
Livinthalife
Cream of the Crop
Livinthalife's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
5,113 posts
Austin,TX
[MORE/SHARE]

condyk wrote:
Can't be bothered with that myself. As long as it delivers a good A4 shot.

Good idea! Once you start the pixel peeping, you will never be satisfied! :)

nice write up also!

Post #7, Aug 21, 2006 20:32:43 as a reply to condyk's post 3 hours earlier.


-Andy-
Canon 6D 85 1.8 Sig 50 1.4
24-105 F4 IS L 580EX 70-200 2.8 100 2.8 L
...:::My Website:::...external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
34,036 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

condyk wrote:
Can't be bothered with that myself. As long as it delivers a good A4 shot.

No worries. I don't generally pixel peep either...check focus and that's about it. I'm just curious about what full size does look like. I mean it covers nearly what Bigma covers, and is SO much smaller! Looks like a good lens for poundin' around with though...for sure.

Post #8, Aug 21, 2006 23:16:41 as a reply to condyk's post 6 hours earlier.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

LOG IN TO REPLY
grego
Cream of the Crop
grego's Avatar
Joined May 2005
8,819 posts
UCLA
[MORE/SHARE]

So what's the focal length on the cat? And how much does it weigh? Will I need to buy a POTN strap for the cat?

Post #9, Aug 21, 2006 23:24:25


Go UCLAexternal link!! |Gear|http://gregburmann.comexternal linkSportsShooterexternal link|Flickrexternal link|

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

grego wrote:
So what's the focal length on the cat? And how much does it weigh? Will I need to buy a POTN strap for the cat?

:lol: :lol: Not sure about focal length but she's got a very large aperture making her excellent at night and indoors without flash. Weight is the problem. Her brother is long, lithe and slinky and she is short and chunky. I tried her with a strap once and no way is that ever gonna happen. She has been fitted with a collar in the past tho', but not sure where I'd attach the tripod :shock:

Post #10, Aug 22, 2006 01:31:06 as a reply to grego's post 2 hours earlier.


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
34,036 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

condyk wrote:
not sure where I'd attach the tripod :shock:

I know this one! *Raises hand* Pick me! Pick me! Ooo oo oo! Pick me! :eek: :)

Post #11, Aug 22, 2006 01:33:27 as a reply to condyk's post 2 minutes earlier.


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
condyk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

cdi-ink.com wrote:
I know this one! *Raises hand* Pick me! Pick me! Ooo oo oo! Pick me! :eek: :)

No! You are a very naughty boy. Go stand in the corner right now :evil:

Post #12, Aug 22, 2006 13:47:39 as a reply to cdifoto's post 12 hours earlier.


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
lakiluno
slightly jealous
lakiluno's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,895 posts
Leeds, UK (formerly Edinburgh, Scotland)
[MORE/SHARE]

:D :D :D :D

Post #13, Aug 22, 2006 13:49:20


Leo
20D|Tamron 17-50 2.8|Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro|50 1.8|Sigma EF-500 DG Super|
My Photo Galleryexternal link *New* | My Gear List | Backup Photos Easily with Robocopy

LOG IN TO REPLY
Permagrin
High Priestess of all I survey
Permagrin's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
77,877 posts
day dreamin'
[MORE/SHARE]

We have this lens (to be more exact, my husband does and I've used it a few times). I like it a lot. The worst part is that with no image stabilization it's hard to keep still without a tripod (I was using it with the MKIIN and it's a heavy combo) on 400mm. But it has nice saturation of colors and pretty good sharpness to the edge of the lens. We use it for wildlife shots. The problem will be finding it. Now Tokina has come out with a new model 80-400 ATX-D and this one isn't available anymore (unless used). I think Amazon sold out of their last one and when we were buying it, we bought the last one BH photo had.

edit: BH appears to have the 80-400 (not the II) and it is a far different lens, with terrible reviews...

Post #14, Aug 22, 2006 13:56:28 as a reply to lakiluno's post 7 minutes earlier.


.. It's Permie's world, we just live in it! ~CDS

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
THREAD ­ STARTER
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Peregrin wrote:
Now Tokina has come out with a new model 80-400 ATX-D and this one isn't available anymore (unless used). I think Amazon sold out of their last one and when we were buying it, we bought the last one BH photo had.

edit: BH appears to have the 80-400 (not the II) and it is a far different lens, with terrible reviews...

This is the brand new model just released see hereexternal link

Post #15, Aug 22, 2006 14:01:30 as a reply to Permagrin's post 5 minutes earlier.


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
86,024 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tokina AF 80-400mm 4.5-5.6 II
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00084 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
763 guests, 704 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is MoMoPhoto32250

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.