Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
Thread started 22 Aug 2006 (Tuesday) 18:17
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Grand Central Station HDR

 
sjafari
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Aug 22, 2006 18:17 |  #1

This is an HDR composed of 4 images, taked mid-day of Grand Central Station in NYC. Actually, it is a combination of 2 HDR images, each using 4 source images (one HDR w/ Photomatix, one w/ CS2). The main body of the image is the Photomatix version, while the the rear wall w/ 3 windows (excluding the flag) is taken from the CS2 version. Punched up and cleaned in CS2 until I was fed up with it, and here is the final.. for now. Any comments and suggestions are welcome.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


view the original size here (external link)

-Shehab-
http://www.fotojafari.​net (external link)

5Dii, 16-35/2.8ii, 24-70/2.8, 135/2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,448 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Aug 22, 2006 18:28 |  #2

Wow! That is awful!

I mean, sorry, but if that is what HDR does (I have CS, not CS2) I think I will save my money.

What makes this processing so astoundingly bad is that there is virtually no contrast at all. HDR! Should be called LDR. As in the shot has almost no range whatsoever!

Flat and gray.

Honestly, don't you think it looks better with some density?

Rad

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
DocFrankenstein
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
12,324 posts
Likes: 7
Joined Apr 2004
Location: where the buffalo roam
     
Aug 22, 2006 18:34 |  #3

LOL Radtech

But then there would be no point to HDR, would be?

I like the people effect. Surrealistic.


National Sarcasm Society. Like we need your support.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sjafari
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Avatar
507 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: Minneapolis, MN
     
Aug 22, 2006 18:35 |  #4

The more contrast and color i added, the more i disliked the image (loses some of the best details, i think). I keep coming up with combinations that are always incredibly flat, rarely getting something good. I tend to drop them out into b/w, and even then it is still pretty regular. The only images i have had luck with are of skyscrapers against a cloudy sky.


-Shehab-
http://www.fotojafari.​net (external link)

5Dii, 16-35/2.8ii, 24-70/2.8, 135/2

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
stupot
Goldmember
2,227 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: UK, Portsmouth Uni / HW Bucks
     
Aug 22, 2006 18:37 |  #5

I quite the bottom half:) try cropping it as a panorama... maybe.

its also a bit wonky:)


Canon EOS 350D, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6, 24-105 f4L IS, 70-200 f4L, 300 f4L IS, Kenko 1.4x pro300, 430EX, Apple Powerbook G4
Free filters for your flashgun!

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fivefish
Senior Member
545 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: State of Confusion
     
Aug 22, 2006 19:18 |  #6

What I would probably like is somewhere between the original picture and Radtech's PP.


Save money! Check out my DIY projects (external link)!
Canon EOS 30D, Canon Digital Rebel
Canon 10-22mm EFS, 70-200mm f4L, 24-105 f4L IS
Canon 50mm f1.8 EF, Canon 75-300mm EF lens
Sigma 150mm Macro, Canon 380EX Flash
DIY High-Speed Sound-activated Flash Trigger and Nikon SB-26 Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,448 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Aug 22, 2006 19:58 as a reply to  @ fivefish's post |  #7

Ok, well lets have some fun.

When it was thought "halfway between" might look nice, I opened them back up and blended them. Here is the results:

Blend
Not too shabby. Still has some density, but takes the saturation down a notch.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

_______________


Then I thought, well that was fun, so lets try more. Starting with the original, I applied three of my favorite actions.

Midnight Sepia.
Doesn't really work with this shot, but does have a nice dreamy feel, if that is what you like.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

_______________

Urban Acid
Brightens the shot a bit too much, but I have liked this action for a lot of other, darker shots.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

_______________

Draganized
I was surprised how much I like this. Rich golden hues, nice density, the floor looks very nice.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

_______________

Urban Acid layered on top of Draganized
In this case the Blend was Saturation, but Color and Luminosity yield good results as well. Get rid of those funky greens and I would really really like this. Has sort of a post-apocalyptic look, I think.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

_______________

.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fivefish
Senior Member
545 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Location: State of Confusion
     
Aug 22, 2006 23:11 |  #8

Draganized looked great.

But the last one (Urban acid layered with Draganized) looks better to me. (yeah, just clone/heal the green pixels in the middle.... shouldn't be too much time consuming.)

If I may ask, where did you get/buy your PS actions?


Save money! Check out my DIY projects (external link)!
Canon EOS 30D, Canon Digital Rebel
Canon 10-22mm EFS, 70-200mm f4L, 24-105 f4L IS
Canon 50mm f1.8 EF, Canon 75-300mm EF lens
Sigma 150mm Macro, Canon 380EX Flash
DIY High-Speed Sound-activated Flash Trigger and Nikon SB-26 Flash

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,448 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Aug 22, 2006 23:49 as a reply to  @ fivefish's post |  #9

fivefish wrote:
Draganized looked great.

But the last one (Urban acid layered with Draganized) looks better to me. (yeah, just clone/heal the green pixels in the middle.... shouldn't be too much time consuming.)

If I may ask, where did you get/buy your PS actions?

These came from Action Central (external link). And best of all, they were free. This link is to the download page - there is about 150 (just a guess without counting) available for download. I did not check all of them so I cannot say that they are all free, but all the ones I have DLed have been free.

Have fun!

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paishin
Member
32 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
Aug 23, 2006 18:42 |  #10

I agree that some of Radtech's images look very nice but i think the point of discussion here should have been HDR rather than photomanipulation.....


Canon EOS 10D
Canon 50mm/28-105mm/70-300mm
Vivitar Series 1 19-35mm
Lots of other stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Radtech1
Everlasting Gobstopper
Avatar
6,448 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Jun 2003
Location: Trantor
     
Aug 23, 2006 19:56 as a reply to  @ paishin's post |  #11

paishin wrote:
I agree that some of Radtech's images look very nice but i think the point of discussion here should have been HDR rather than photomanipulation.....

Sorry,

I did not mean to hijack the thread, and I did not perceive that HDR was something other than photomanipulaiton.

The OP has Edits OK turned on. I thought the original shot was flat as posted, and my edits were intended as a demonstration of different, and perhaps better, post processing.

Again, apologies if I overstepped my welcome.

Rad


.
.

Be humble, for you are made of the earth. Be noble, for you are made of the stars.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Joined Sep 2004
Location: USA
     
Aug 23, 2006 20:11 as a reply to  @ Radtech1's post |  #12
bannedPermanent ban

Radtech1 wrote:
Wow! That is awful!

I mean, sorry, but if that is what HDR does (I have CS, not CS2) I think I will save my money.

What makes this processing so astoundingly bad is that there is virtually no contrast at all. HDR! Should be called LDR. As in the shot has almost no range whatsoever!

Flat and gray.

Honestly, don't you think it looks better with some density?

Rad

IMAGE NOT FOUND
| Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

I agree. The HDR version is horribly low in contrast - like just lightening the shadows a LOT. Photography is often to see things differently - NOT how our eyes see them.


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MitsuJDM
Senior Member
Avatar
567 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
     
Aug 24, 2006 12:32 |  #13

All I did was bump up sharpness and contrst and played with hue/saturation......

With my limited HDR experiance, I've noticed HDR without prior PP will mostly look flat, not sharp and low on contrast.

IMAGE NOT FOUND
IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

350D+grip+lenses
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rkmphotography/ (external link)http://www.flickr.com/​photos/rkmphotography/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
paishin
Member
32 posts
Joined Nov 2005
     
Aug 24, 2006 20:49 |  #14

don't get me wrong radtech, in no way i ment that you hijacked the thread....i just think that that was not what sjafari was trying to achieve in the first place. i could be wrong though....

I like what mitsujdm did...it gives it much more depth, still abit too bright and a tad oversaturated for my taste


Canon EOS 10D
Canon 50mm/28-105mm/70-300mm
Vivitar Series 1 19-35mm
Lots of other stuff...

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,055 views & 0 likes for this thread
Grand Central Station HDR
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Critique Corner 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is Angester
685 guests, 305 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.