Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
Thread started 24 Aug 2006 (Thursday) 08:39
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

What is pixel peeping?

 
curiousgeorge
Goldmember
Avatar
3,830 posts
Likes: 56
Joined Feb 2006
Location: London
     
Aug 24, 2006 08:39 |  #1

.. and why does it get mentioned so much?

George


Photos from Iceland (external link) | Lake District (external link) | Isle of Lewis (external link) | Macros (external link)
Canon EOS 6D | Canon 24-70mm f/4L | Canon 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS | Canon 70-200mm f/4L | Speedlite 430EX II | Canon Powershot G9

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Benandbobbi
Goldmember
Avatar
1,554 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Springdale, Arkansas USA
     
Aug 24, 2006 08:55 |  #2

Pixel peeping is examining a digital image down a very fine detail, possibly at the individual pixel (dot on a screen) level, depending on how literal\anal the examiner is. Why is it mentioned? Because people spending thousands of dollars on lenses want the best possible picture in terms od image quality (IQ) or sharpeness. Most quality lenses are undecernable from one another if not viewed at this or a similar level of detail.


My Gear
My Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CorruptedPhotographer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,802 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Jul 2005
Location: AbuDhabi, United Arab Emirates
     
Aug 24, 2006 08:59 |  #3

peeping at pixels,because it happens a lot.


Gear List
Member since 2005 ^_^

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
Avatar
48,188 posts
Gallery: 79 photos
Likes: 4336
Joined Apr 2003
Location: Rhode Island USA
     
Aug 24, 2006 09:05 |  #4

The term was originally made popular by (perhaps even coined by) Michael Reichman of the Luminous Landscape, he used it as a specifically derogatory term after he had had an epiphany that image quality was suddenly no longer of importance in digital photography, as it was good enough across the board. (i'm breaking this down to nutshell status)
He applied the term Pixel Peepers to those that still felt that measurable IQ tests were valid.

The backlash was significant as his readers were split roughly 50/50% by those that agreed with this new sentiment, and those that had followed years of reviews by Michael himself that were in fact exactly that, self described Pixel Peeping, and suddenly being told by there fearless leader that all this time, effort, and text was moot. For months the LL Forums were dominated by debate and argument on the subject.

Another term for pixel peepers, is "Ruler shooter" ie: people who seem to spend more time photographing charts and rulers for backfocus etc.. than actually using there gear for photography.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mark_Cohran
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
15,646 posts
Best ofs: 1
Likes: 884
Joined Jul 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
     
Aug 24, 2006 13:05 |  #5

Just to stir things up with my definition :)

Photographers judge their lenses and cameras based on real world experience - photos of landscapes, people, wildlife, etc.

Pixel peepers judge everything based on 100% crops of resolution charts, rulers, and batteries.

It seems the ratio of photographers to pixel peepers is 2/8.

Well, it is a subjective definition after all. :)

Mark


Mark
-----
Some primes, some zooms, some Ls, some bodies and they all play nice together.
Forty years of shooting and still learning.
My Tumblr Site (external link) (NSFW)
Follow Me on Instagram (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Jon, ­ The ­ Elder
teaching fish to ride a bicycle
Avatar
2,490 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Oct 2004
Location: Warren, Michigan
     
Aug 24, 2006 13:45 as a reply to  @ Mark_Cohran's post |  #6

Have to agree with Mark. - Now that you understand the term. You can see from the threads and answers just where you stand.

Nearly every sport/avocation/hobby has its devotees to extreme details of the end product. Does it matter in the real flow of things?
Personaly, I think not, but others will rise up with great fervor and defend the importance of minute aspects of their chosen area of interest.

Another term that I hear a lot is "measurbator". Crude but probably more succinct.


A 40D, a 30D, some nice glass and a great Shooting Partner.
"...As in music, so in life."

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
fotoworx
"I get 'em pregnant"
Avatar
4,630 posts
Gallery: 7 photos
Likes: 151
Joined Mar 2009
Location: Australia
     
Mar 24, 2011 01:25 |  #7

Honestly - What is pixel peeping?

Seriously what is it REALLY? It's a term that I've read 1000's of times (we all have)....can someone really explain the nitty gritty of what really pixel peeping actually is?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
Avatar
10,884 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
     
Mar 24, 2011 01:30 as a reply to  @ fotoworx's post |  #8

Persons that are overly anal about their images. They tend to view everything at 100% or more and work on a per pixel basis.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery (external link) | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
FlyingPhotog
Cream of the "Prop"
Avatar
57,560 posts
Likes: 120
Joined May 2007
Location: Probably Chasing Aircraft
     
Mar 24, 2011 01:40 as a reply to  @ fotoworx's post |  #9

People who try to appreciate a forest by staring at 1 square inch of bark...


Jay
Crosswind Images (external link)
Facebook Fan Page (external link)

"If you aren't getting extraordinary images from today's dSLRs, regardless of brand, it's not the camera!" - Bill Fortney, Nikon Corp.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
Avatar
13,403 posts
Likes: 169
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
     
Mar 24, 2011 06:31 as a reply to  @ fotoworx's post |  #10

Reminds me of the Zen saying that an ignorant man picks up a pebble and sees a pebble, a student picks up a pebble and sees a mountain and a Zen Master picks up a pebble and sees ... a pebble.


Elie / אלי

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Monito
Senior Member
Avatar
460 posts
Likes: 2
Joined Jan 2005
Location: Halifax, NS, ex-California
     
Mar 24, 2011 07:13 as a reply to  @ fotoworx's post |  #11

Pixel-peeping is viewing pixels from a full-resolution image at 100% (or even 200%) on a computer monitor.

Pixel-peeping is a tool that can become a disease.


Canon System: fullframe DSLRs, lenses. Tripods, Alien Bees.
Always learning and striving to make better photographs.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
chauncey
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,696 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 460
Joined Jun 2007
Location: MI/CO
     
Mar 24, 2011 07:16 as a reply to  @ tzalman's post |  #12

'Tis me. One who tests that new lens inside>tripod mounted>MLU>remote shutter>various SS to determine which f/stop gives him a single, or at most three, pixel edge to his subject.
We tend to hang out in the macro section of the forum where the devil is in the detail.


The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/c​hauncey43 (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
hollis_f
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
10,649 posts
Gallery: 1 photo
Likes: 84
Joined Jul 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
     
Mar 24, 2011 08:05 as a reply to  @ fotoworx's post |  #13

Pixel-peeping is an innocuous-seeming habit that can slowly lure one into the ravages of measurebation. This pernicious affliction results in the sufferer being unable to photograph anything apart from lines of batteries, brick walls and test charts (set to 45º with a protractor).


Frank Hollis - Retired mass spectroscopist
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish and he'll complain about the withdrawal of his free fish entitlement.
Gear Website (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dharrisphotog
Goldmember
Avatar
2,331 posts
Joined Apr 2009
     
Mar 24, 2011 08:10 as a reply to  @ fotoworx's post |  #14

Something you shouldn't worry about and have your laugh at the people that practice this.


D800 | Sigma 35mm 1.4 Art | Nikkor 85mm 1.8G | Nikkor 70-200 2.8G
Gear | Facebook (external link) | Twitter (external link) | Flickr (external link) | Google+ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
gjl711
They have pills for that now you know.
Avatar
53,850 posts
Likes: 1477
Joined Aug 2006
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
     
Mar 24, 2011 08:13 |  #15

hollis_f wrote in post #12082447 (external link)
... (set to 45º with a protractor).

You still use a protractor??... what an amateur.

:):):)

i kid.. i kid..


Not sure why, but call me JJ.
I used to hate math but then I realised decimals have a point.
.
::Flickr:: (external link)
::Gear::

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

46,620 views & 34 likes for this thread
What is pixel peeping?
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre General Photography Talk 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is benbodey
813 guests, 420 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.