Canon Digital Photography Forums  

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > RAW, Post Processing and Printing
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #1
mackb
Member
 
mackb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH-IO
Posts: 537
Default RAW converted straight to JPEG

If I shoot RAW, open the image and convert it to JPEG without making any corrections, will the image look the way it would have if it were taken in JPEG?

please don't tell me to search this topic or that "it's been asked before"......I'm sensitive
__________________
Billy

Last edited by mackb : 6th of September 2006 (Wed) at 21:02.
mackb is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #2
HoRnYTuRbO
Member
 
HoRnYTuRbO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 617
Posts: 985
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

yah it should if u dont adjust anything
__________________
-Vinny
HoRnYTuRbO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #3
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
 
Tsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South_the 601
Posts: 10,420
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

To be honest I've never actually saved my RAW's as jpeg but my thinking it would read the parameter used in the camera with the resulting image being that.

Give it a try and see _
__________________

Canon EOS 7D | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS
Canon PowerShot S95
MY PBASE GALLERY
Tsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #4
mackb
Member
 
mackb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH-IO
Posts: 537
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluedog_XT

Give it a try and see _

OK......I'm dumb ........good idea!

Thanks........and just to be clear I did ask a legit question ,....I did not ask "what's better RAW or JPEG"....LOL
__________________
Billy
mackb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #5
PacAce
Moderator
 
PacAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ABE, PA USA
Posts: 26,807
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackb
If I shoot RAW, open the image and convert it to JPEG without making any corrections, will the image look the way it would have if it were taken in JPEG?

please don't tell me to search this topic or that "it's been asked before"......I'm sensitive
Depends on what raw converter you use. With Canon's or any 3rd party converter that uses the Canon raw converter API, yes, it will. With Photoshop or the rest of the other 3rd party converter, probably not.
__________________
...Leo
PacAce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #6
JaertX
Goldmember
 
JaertX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Amarillo, Texas
Posts: 2,018
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

it won't, actually. JPEGS have a little bit of sharpening, contrast and saturation adjustment, and noise reduction done to them...if you just process your RAW file and do nothing to it, it will probably look a little flat, unsharp, and noisey...may or may not be a drastic difference, depending on the shot.

(edit) one thing though...if your raw converter uses some "auto" adjustments to the file, it may tweak them to make up for it.
__________________
Jason - I use Canon and stuff
JaertX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #7
mackb
Member
 
mackb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH-IO
Posts: 537
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

I’ll continue to test this out and find what works best for me, but there does seem to be two different answers to something that should be straight forward……and by the way I use RSE .

Thanks for the help!
__________________
Billy
mackb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #8
tim
Light Bringer
 
tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 49,209
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

The camera usually applies sharpening, contrast, and saturation to the JPG, so unless your RAW convertor does that it won't be identical.
__________________
tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #9
PacAce
Moderator
 
PacAce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ABE, PA USA
Posts: 26,807
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

In case some of you weren't listening:

Quote:
Originally Posted by PacAce
Depends on what raw converter you use. With Canon's or any 3rd party converter that uses the Canon raw converter API, yes, it will. With Photoshop or the rest of the other 3rd party converter, probably not.
__________________
...Leo
PacAce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #10
JaertX
Goldmember
 
JaertX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Amarillo, Texas
Posts: 2,018
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

I guess I need to go back and try DPP again. I'm using Bibble now, occasionally ACR, and am very happy with them.

DPP left images very noisy compared to jpegs straight from the camera...but that is just anecdotal experience, not scientific fact. But from using it for a year or so before I bought Bibble and CS2, it didn't seem like Canon's RAW converter worked as well as it's in-camera JPEG converter.
__________________
Jason - I use Canon and stuff
JaertX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of September 2006 (Wed)   #11
Palladium
Goldmember
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Not the Left Coast but the Right Coast - USA
Posts: 3,895
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackb
If I shoot RAW, open the image and convert it to JPEG without making any corrections, will the image look the way it would have if it were taken in JPEG?...
I'll add this into the discussion - depending upon what color space you have your camera set to capture in will also affect how your images look.

SRGB is a small color space that Adobe RGB - so less color range is captured if your using SRGB
__________________
For Sale: Gitzo GT3541LS & 3 Lens Sigma 24mm, Sigma 50mm, Canon 28mm http://photography-on-the.net/forum/....php?t=1391911


Palladium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of September 2006 (Thu)   #12
tim
Light Bringer
 
tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 49,209
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

Did you say something PacAce? I wasn't listening
__________________
tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of September 2006 (Thu)   #13
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
 
tzalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
Posts: 12,473
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

Quote:
Originally Posted by PacAce
Depends on what raw converter you use. With Canon's or any 3rd party converter that uses the Canon raw converter API, yes, it will. With Photoshop or the rest of the other 3rd party converter, probably not.
Sorry, but I think that needs a bit of modification. It is indeed true of Zoombrowser, but DPP produces a different result.
Elie
__________________
Elie / אלי
"If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product." John Irving, 5/2012. "In theory there is no difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is." Yogi Berra
Site
tzalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of September 2006 (Thu)   #14
tzalman
Fatal attraction.
 
tzalman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gesher Haziv, Israel
Posts: 12,473
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

Quote:
Originally Posted by mackb
there does seem to be two different answers to something that should be straight forward…….

Thanks for the help!
Well, that's the nature of internet forums. There is no guarantee that anybody here knows anything.
Elie
__________________
Elie / אלי
"If you presume to love something, you must love the process of it much more than you love the finished product." John Irving, 5/2012. "In theory there is no difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is." Yogi Berra
Site
tzalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of September 2006 (Thu)   #15
tim
Light Bringer
 
tim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wellington, New Zealand
Posts: 49,209
Default Re: RAW converted straight to JPEG

Quote:
Originally Posted by tzalman
Well, that's the nature of internet forums. There is no guarantee that anybody here knows anything.
Elie
I don't know anything, I just repeat what i've read, got I high post now people think I know what i'm on about. Heh, that'll teach them for believing someone on the internet
__________________
tim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon 5D RAW+JPEG - JPEG Portrait Rotation Problem StephenJames Canon EOS Digital Cameras 10 23rd of May 2007 (Wed) 16:08
first time jpeg straight from camer jpalmer Birds 3 6th of May 2007 (Sun) 17:17
Photoshop JPEG from RAW Vs. In-Camera JPEG File Size ZRebel RAW, Post Processing and Printing 4 18th of December 2006 (Mon) 19:08
First converted RAW image.... chops Critique Corner 20 30th of November 2004 (Tue) 15:49
Why are my L JPEG pic sharper than Raw converted to Tif,JPEG dennykyser Canon EOS Digital Cameras 3 18th of January 2004 (Sun) 02:31


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:23.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.