Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge
Thread started 23 Sep 2006 (Saturday) 17:19
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Are you a Paparazzi or know someone who is?

 
sydneyguy30
Senior Member
277 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Sep 23, 2006 17:19 |  #1

Just a dumb question,

I am about curious few things...

Don't know is anyone has seen the TV Show on Pay TV called "Paparazzi" (uk)

It is about the cameras following photographers lives as they seek celebrities...

I am curious to know how most people tend to get into that line of work

Most of them are "freelance" i' assume

I'd like to know how and what they did prior to getting into this type of work.

I.e.

did they do other sorts of photog or still do...

how u can try and enter this line of work

how u may attempt to get stuff published if your not a big shot known photog...

can u get your pictures published randomly by an agent even if you are not contracted to them....

etc


Sydney, Australia. Entered the world of "DSLR" Photography in 2006.
Canon 400D (XTI).
Standard 18-55 Lens, Standard 70-300 Lens.
1 and 2 Gig Memory Card Sandisk Extreme III.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
MagicallyDelicious
Goldmember
MagicallyDelicious's Avatar
4,083 posts
Joined May 2006
Southport UK
Sep 23, 2006 17:20 |  #2

Ive seen a simlar prog and i think most of them are freelance.


every mistake is a lesson learned

My Websiteexternal link Myspaceexternal link
Canon 300D 18-55 Kit, Canon 35-80, Canon 50mm 1.8, Sigma 500 DG Super,
Bits n Bobs
RAW FOR DUMMIES

Your Mind Is Like A Parachute.....Only Works When Open.

LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoScout
Senior Member
PhotoScout's Avatar
887 posts
Joined Jun 2006
California
Sep 23, 2006 22:08 |  #3

Here in the US, the Paparazzi seem to have a bad reputation. Too many of them go beyond what is reasonable to capture the open and simi-private lives of celebrities. I say simi-private because regardless that a public figure is just that, they still deserve privacy.

The market is extremely competitive and the Paparazzi will do just about anything to get that one shot. Many celebrities have lashed back and found themselves in trouble with the law and same with the Paparazzi and the media who publishes questionable images.

The respected Paparazzi are those who are employed by major magazines and other media that work with the celebrity. Just last month there was a large reward promised by one of the print media to whomever could get a picture of Tom Cruz and Katie Holmes' new baby. It was like a shark frenzy. Just about anyone with a camera (cell phone cameras included) tried desperately to get the shot for the reward money.

I would rather be at the right place and the right time and get that shot that is news worthy or an appropriately captured Paparazzi image that the open media would buy.

Just my thoughts.


5D * 20D * XHA1S * HF11
EF 35mm f/1.4L USM * EF 50mm f/2.5 Compact Macro
EF 85mm f/1.8 USM * EF 16-35mm f/2.8L USM
EF-S 17-85MM f/4-5.6 IS USM * EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM * Ext EF 1.4x ll * Ext EF 2x ll * 580EX Flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
SimonG
Goldmember
SimonG's Avatar
1,007 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Kitchener, ON
Sep 23, 2006 22:11 as a reply to PhotoScout's post |  #4

This should probablly be in "Talk About Photography" eh. That is, unless you have a photo of a paparazzi for us sydneyguy30. ;)


-- Michael (a.k.a. SimonG)
EOS 5D | 17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L | 40 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.4 | 430EX | Zenfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcw122
Goldmember
jcw122's Avatar
1,940 posts
Joined Jul 2006
West Chester, PA
Sep 23, 2006 22:25 |  #5

Most of the paparazzi pictures I've seen have nothing to do with actual art, it's just using a nice SLR or DSLR with good lenses to simply get an image, not even a photograph, an image.

IMO paparazzi are not photographers, and never will be.


*Please Note* I'm talking about the invasive, rude, stereotypical kind...if your not that type of paparazzi, then be proud.


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

LOG IN TO REPLY
sydneyguy30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
277 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Sep 23, 2006 22:27 as a reply to jcw122's post |  #6

so many threads are not always posted in the most relevant fields.

seeing as celebrities and paparazzi are "people"

i figured this section was quite relevant

but your right in the way that there are no pics

sorry

ha


Sydney, Australia. Entered the world of "DSLR" Photography in 2006.
Canon 400D (XTI).
Standard 18-55 Lens, Standard 70-300 Lens.
1 and 2 Gig Memory Card Sandisk Extreme III.

LOG IN TO REPLY
SimonG
Goldmember
SimonG's Avatar
1,007 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Kitchener, ON
Sep 23, 2006 22:49 |  #7

sydneyguy30 wrote in post #2028388external link
so many threads are not always posted in the most relevant fields. ...

Sure, that's true... still, there's no harm in a friendly reminder. :)


-- Michael (a.k.a. SimonG)
EOS 5D | 17-40 f/4L | 24-105 f/4L | 40 f/2.8 | 50 f/1.4 | 85 f/1.4 | 430EX | Zenfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
ssim's Avatar
10,884 posts
Joined Apr 2003
southern Alberta, Canada
Sep 23, 2006 23:41 |  #8

jcw122 wrote in post #2028382external link
IMO paparazzi are not photographers, and never will be.

I'm not a fan of them but some of them are pretty darned good photographers. If you look at some of the environments that they have to shoot in they turn out some decent work. I would sort of equate them to the lawyer that hands out business cards at the scene of an accident, he/she is still a lawyer.

I get a show on satellite tv here that follows one or two of these guys around. Certainly not a life for me but the income that the good ones get is just not fair. They do have a bad rap in North America but by and large they brought that on themselves.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Galleryexternal link | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

LOG IN TO REPLY
sydneyguy30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
277 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Sep 24, 2006 04:01 |  #9

interesting.

i see what your saying, but it still takes a certain character and degree of craft to get good shots and to know how to get the good ones.

jcw122 wrote in post #2028382external link
Most of the paparazzi pictures I've seen have nothing to do with actual art, it's just using a nice SLR or DSLR with good lenses to simply get an image, not even a photograph, an image.

IMO paparazzi are not photographers, and never will be.

*Please Note* I'm talking about the invasive, rude, stereotypical kind...if your not that type of paparazzi, then be proud.


Sydney, Australia. Entered the world of "DSLR" Photography in 2006.
Canon 400D (XTI).
Standard 18-55 Lens, Standard 70-300 Lens.
1 and 2 Gig Memory Card Sandisk Extreme III.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sydneyguy30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
277 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Sep 24, 2006 04:02 |  #10

thanks

hopefully no one will keep posting here as its in the wrong area

SimonG wrote in post #2028439external link
Sure, that's true... still, there's no harm in a friendly reminder. :)


Sydney, Australia. Entered the world of "DSLR" Photography in 2006.
Canon 400D (XTI).
Standard 18-55 Lens, Standard 70-300 Lens.
1 and 2 Gig Memory Card Sandisk Extreme III.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Col_M
Goldmember
Col_M's Avatar
1,110 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Prague, Czech Rep.
Sep 24, 2006 10:31 |  #11

"don't hate the player, hate the game" and all that...

IMHO it's society, tabloid newspapers and the trash magazines like OK, Hello and Heat (examples from the UK) that create a demand for photographs of celebs doing everyday things. The paps are just fulfilling this demand created by society, if people didn't read these publications their sales would plummet and there would be no demand for paps' photos.

My stance on paps themselves is neutral, they're doing a job that many people don't like but at the same time many people read publications with their photos in :confused:


Col (short for Colin)

5D+Grip¦24-70L¦50 1.4¦100 2.8 Macro¦Sigma 70-200 EX DG¦430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
sydneyguy30
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
277 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Sep 25, 2006 07:07 as a reply to Col_M's post |  #12

true


Sydney, Australia. Entered the world of "DSLR" Photography in 2006.
Canon 400D (XTI).
Standard 18-55 Lens, Standard 70-300 Lens.
1 and 2 Gig Memory Card Sandisk Extreme III.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,200 views & 0 likes for this thread
Are you a Paparazzi or know someone who is?
FORUMS Community Talk, Chatter & Official Stuff The Lounge


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0031 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is cabock
822 guests, 645 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015