Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography
Thread started 03 Oct 2006 (Tuesday) 21:02
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Someone wants to purchase one of my images!

 
T.D.
Moderator
T.D.'s Avatar
33,372 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Joined Aug 2005
Willamette Valley, Oregon
Oct 03, 2006 21:02 |  #1

I just received this comment on one of my shots on smugmug:

Great shot of the capital! I'm a local realtor wandering if I can purchase the rights to use this shot in some of my marketing.

Please get back to me, I'll even send you a mock up sample of the ad I hope to run.

Thanks,

This is a shot of the state capitol. I have absolutely no idea what I should charge. Any thoughts??

Here is a link to the image: http://hoyboy.smugmug.​com/photos/87880268-L.jpgexternal link


Gear List
Take a picture, it lasts longerexternal link
(My Gallery)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
floydianslip6
Senior Member
floydianslip6's Avatar
332 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Worcester, Ma
Oct 03, 2006 21:08 |  #2

Its a bit complicated since they are going to be using the shot for marketing. The first question would be what kind of file they want. If they want a digital file, how big and at what DPI, the bigger the photo and the higher the DPI the more expensive the shot is going to be. The majority of stock photography at high resolution 9" x 6" at 300dpi is around $400 - $500 WITHOUT ROYALTY.

The other question to ask yourself is do you expect royalties everytime they use the image. Also if the image is a major part of the ad, are you going to be paid per lead that the ad generates??

Selling photography for marketing is a tough call since there are so many factors. I'd leave it to someone with more experience in this kind of work than myself...I'm sure someone else can elaborate. Just some ideas to think about.


Urban Photography at its creepiest
www.UrbanEden.wsexternal link
Weapons of choice:
Canon 350D [Digital Rebel XT]
Canon ultrasonic EF-S 10-22mm wide angle
Canon ultrasonic EF-S 17-85mm general purpose
Canon 580ex speedlight flash
Sunpack QSX 7001DX tripod
2GB CF card
4D cell maglight [aka self-defense club]
P100 asbestos respirator

LOG IN TO REPLY
fivefish
Senior Member
545 posts
Joined Jul 2006
State of Confusion
Oct 03, 2006 23:37 as a reply to floydianslip6's post |  #3

Think future sales... from the same realtor, or from their colleagues. Don't price yourself out of a sale but don't give it away too.

I think $150-$250 for this promo run is a good price, and if she decides to do another print run, then maybe charge an addtl $100-200 license per use afterwards.

Then tell him/her to recommend you to some of his colleagues.

PS: Realtors are kinda cheap so don't think big $$$ when charging them.


Save money! Check out my DIY projectsexternal link!
Canon EOS 30D, Canon Digital Rebel
Canon 10-22mm EFS, 70-200mm f4L, 24-105 f4L IS
Canon 50mm f1.8 EF, Canon 75-300mm EF lens
Sigma 150mm Macro, Canon 380EX Flash
DIY High-Speed Sound-activated Flash Trigger and Nikon SB-26 Flash

LOG IN TO REPLY
IndyJeff
Goldmember
IndyJeff's Avatar
1,892 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 03, 2006 23:48 as a reply to fivefish's post |  #4

Whoa, whoa, whoa fellas. Don't get to hopped up on the possible income, initially and future wise. First, ask yourself "Can I sell this to be used in an ad campaign?"

While you may rain on their parade and glamourous ideas of using the state capitol in their ads, they will sure be thankful if you ask your attorney, or suggesting they ask their attorney, can they use this without any sort of release from the state. Better to see bitter dissappointment on their face from not being able to use it than to have them with that hounddog look in front of a judge just after he finds in the states favor against them and you.

Just check first....better safe than sorry.


On shooting sports...If you see it happen then you didn't get it.

LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
LBaldwin's Avatar
4,490 posts
Joined Mar 2006
San Jose,CA
Oct 04, 2006 20:43 as a reply to IndyJeff's post |  #5

Ok gang,

First images of public properterty belong to the photographer. The gov't cannot prevent or stop the use of images of public(ly) owned property.

I have made several inquires along this line. Just like images that belong to
the National archives the military and several government agencies can;t charge for usage, just printing costs. Your tax dollars paid for the buildings, parks etc. Permits are sometimes needed for shooting in those areas, but the images belong to the photographer.

2nd the buyer of the images may understand some of usage rights. So the seller should act accordingly. Usage rights are sold so, that the end user can utilize the image legally.

Try not to sell all rights to the image, but limited and exclusive rights. If you set up the sale according to the usage + exclusive time frame.

You want to find out what type of material he wants to produce. Newspaper, magazine or TV is one set of rates, web based is additional.

The client will probably want a comprehensive usage agreement. If so something in 1200 to 1500 per year is not unusual. 250 to 400 would be for just one type of usage. As far as lowering the price against possible future work is basically BS. Enforce your rights, conduct your self in a professional manner and you will get respect. THAT will get you future business and allow you to negotiaite from a position of strength.

There are great calculators on the EP website along with some excellent contracts. EP has legal assistance from top attorneys so you can depend on the quality of their stuff.

Thanks,

Les


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
T.D.
THREAD ­ STARTER
Moderator
T.D.'s Avatar
33,372 posts
Gallery: 6 photos
Joined Aug 2005
Willamette Valley, Oregon
Oct 04, 2006 23:12 |  #6

Thanks everyone for your advice. You've certainly given me a good starting point. This is all so new to me.

I appreciate you each sharing your perspectives.


Gear List
Take a picture, it lasts longerexternal link
(My Gallery)external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
IndyJeff
Goldmember
IndyJeff's Avatar
1,892 posts
Joined Oct 2003
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 05, 2006 07:22 |  #7

LBaldwin wrote in post #2078103external link
Ok gang,

First images of public properterty belong to the photographer. The gov't cannot prevent or stop the use of images of public(ly) owned property.


This is an advertising use and that may be a different set of circumstances, it would still be best to check with an attorney before proceding any further. The state still has the right to control the use of it's property images. I could be wrong but, it would be better to check first.

As an example the state of Kentucky registered the word Kentucky and got a trademark/copyright on it. Ever wonder why Kentucky Fried Chicken is now KFC since Pepsi bought it? How about the Kentucky Derby? Ever notice it is now advertised "The Run for the Roses" by ABC and not the Kentucky Derby?


On shooting sports...If you see it happen then you didn't get it.

LOG IN TO REPLY
LBaldwin
Goldmember
LBaldwin's Avatar
4,490 posts
Joined Mar 2006
San Jose,CA
Oct 06, 2006 01:01 |  #8

IndyJeff wrote in post #2079614external link
This is an advertising use and that may be a different set of circumstances, it would still be best to check with an attorney before proceding any further. The state still has the right to control the use of it's property images. I could be wrong but, it would be better to check first.

As an example the state of Kentucky registered the word Kentucky and got a trademark/copyright on it. Ever wonder why Kentucky Fried Chicken is now KFC since Pepsi bought it? How about the Kentucky Derby? Ever notice it is now advertised "The Run for the Roses" by ABC and not the Kentucky Derby?

For a large nationwide TV campaign I might agree. For a local ad I would not bother. You might call the state media relations department, but it is generally geared to TV not stills. Agreed that each state is different. Checking with a lawyer before I use an image I create? I might as well hang up my camera and get a job flipping burgers.

I do keep an attorney in my rolodex for contract issues. Most lawyers are not really equipped to handle issues as above. It would be cost prohibitive to do this even once for a small case useage.

BTW has every business that uses the name Kentucky removed it from its name?
Les


Les Baldwin
http://www.fotosfx.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

955 views & 0 likes for this thread
Someone wants to purchase one of my images!
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00077 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
Latest registered member is Stinson
926 guests, 586 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016