LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Classic auto show...best lens to take along...

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 12 Oct 2006 (Thursday) 19:10   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Margie
Senior Member
Margie's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
501 posts
S.J. CA
[MORE/SHARE]

This week-end I will be visiting a Classic Auto show, held outdoors, the cars will probaby be spaced pretty closed together.

I only want to bring one lens with me on my 350D. Which lens would be better to bring...Tamron 28-75, Sigma 10-20 or Canon 70-200 ?

I am thinking the 28-75...Please let me know if you agree or if you would select a different lens, which one and why.

Thank you for your assistance,

Margie

Post #1, Oct 12, 2006 19:10:51


Margie

Canon Rebel XT/ Canon PS G6/ 28-75 F2.8 Tamron/ 18-55 Kit /
100 F2.8 Macro/ 70-200F4 L Canon/ Canon 300 F 4 L IS/Sigma 10-20 F 4-5.6 /
1.4 II TC Canon

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Luckie8
Senior Member
Luckie8's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
995 posts
Dirty Jerz
[MORE/SHARE]

Since i'ts outdoors, bring the Siggy.. it'll be fun..

Post #2, Oct 12, 2006 19:16:19


Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
anglext
Senior Member
anglext's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
245 posts
Nashville, Tennessee
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd take the Tamron cuz of the 2.8 and the good mid range. If you can take 2 take the 10-20 for fun....but for all around useability take the Tamron.

Just my 0.02c

Post #3, Oct 12, 2006 19:19:13 as a reply to Luckie8's post 2 minutes earlier.


Websiteexternal link|Blogexternal link|Canon 5D|BG-E4 Battery Grip|
|Canon EF 24-70 f/2.8 L|Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L|Canon EF 17-40 f/4 L|Canon EF 85 f/1.8|Zenitar 16mm f/2.8|Sigma 50mm f/2.8 Macro
|Manfrotto 3021 Tripod Legs & Grip Action Ballhead|Custom Bracket QRS-35-EV|Canon 580 EX Flash|Apple iMac G5|

LOG IN TO REPLY
GeneMan88
Goldmember
GeneMan88's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
1,108 posts
Portland, OR U.S.A.
[MORE/SHARE]

Your Tamron 28-75 should serve you well in this situation. But an UWA lens can be fun at times for those great close up shots... though they'll be distorted.

Post #4, Oct 12, 2006 19:28:22


1D MKI + 1Ds MKI + 5D MKI Kit - EF17-35 f2.8L | EF24-70 f2.8 L | EF 100-400L IS | EF15 f2.8 | EF35L | EF50 f1.4 | EF85 f1.8 | EF135L | 580EX II | 580EX I | 270EX II | G12
PDX/Vancouver Photography Meetup Groupexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sugarzebra
Cream of the Crop
sugarzebra's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
9,254 posts
Oshawa, Ontario
[MORE/SHARE]

If the cars are close together and there are a lot of people milling around (getting in your way), the 28-75 will seem pretty long. I think your best bet is to take two lenses, the 10-22 & the 28-75. If you are sticking to one lens, I'd take the 10-22 (and have lots of fun with the UWA).

Post #5, Oct 12, 2006 19:33:31


Scott

Website & Blogexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
crn3371
Cream of the Crop
crn3371's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
7,198 posts
SoCal, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I'd try to take both. The Tamron would probably be the most practical, but the Sigma could certainly make for some fun shots.

Post #6, Oct 12, 2006 19:39:27




LOG IN TO REPLY
ekie
Goldmember
ekie's Avatar
Joined Jun 2005
1,223 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

if u can, take both .. last year when i went to a exotic type car show. they lined up the cars on both side of a 2 way street and with ppl walking around .. i found that the tamron 28-75 wasnt wide enough sometimes. plus with UWA, it'll produce some interesting shots :D

the tamron would be great for candid shots though hehe

Post #7, Oct 12, 2006 20:19:44 as a reply to crn3371's post 40 minutes earlier.


ekin photographyexternal link | flickrexternal link
... gear list ...

LOG IN TO REPLY
mxwphoto
Senior Member
mxwphoto's Avatar
Joined May 2006
588 posts
Bay Area CA
[MORE/SHARE]

IF you could only take one, I would take the Sigma. I often find myself not being able to back up far enough to get in the whole car at shows like these using my 28-135 IS. And when I can back up far enough, there'd be others who would stand in front or partially block the view, which becomes very annoying. On a APS-C sensor 28mm = 44.8mm, which is not wide at all. Now if you only wanted a part of the car, say the hood ornament and such, a regular zoom like the Tamron would suffice.

Post #8, Oct 12, 2006 20:41:47


Great shots are like great parking spaces... if you're not quick, it's gone!

LOG IN TO REPLY
Luckie8
Senior Member
Luckie8's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
995 posts
Dirty Jerz
[MORE/SHARE]

Whichever lens you decide to bring with you, dont forget to post some pics when you get back..

Post #9, Oct 12, 2006 20:46:07


Feedback

LOG IN TO REPLY
WxGuesser
Senior Member
WxGuesser's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
630 posts
Vacaville, Ca
[MORE/SHARE]

when i went to the Blackhawk Museum in Dublin, Ca.. they didn't let me take my tripod in... it made things really difficult... i don't have an exernal flash and the lighting wasn't so good... so i had to do some longer exposures to make up for my lack of light... i ended up using the little barrier poles to keep people away from the cars as a monopod... and it seemed to work fine...

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.kevinchurch​.smugmug.com/photos/99​290322-L.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.kevinchurch​.smugmug.com/photos/99​346441-L.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


I used the kit lens for these

Post #10, Oct 12, 2006 20:49:46


Canon 350D | EF 17-40 f4 L | EF 50 f1.8 | "Kit Lens" | EF 70-200 f2.8 L on order | Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro | EF 1.4x II L
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things.

LOG IN TO REPLY
PEACHMAN
Cream of the Crop
PEACHMAN's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
5,120 posts
Warren, Maine,USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Tamron 28-75 has worked well for me at car shows...!

Wxgusser...kit lens? fantastic! I have had some good succes with mine, but usually only in very good light...I suppose these were well lit with display lights?

Post #11, Oct 12, 2006 20:58:23


The "eyes" have it !


LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
WxGuesser
Senior Member
WxGuesser's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
630 posts
Vacaville, Ca
[MORE/SHARE]

Here is an example of how dark the place was.... i thought it was kind of dark.. i had alot of trouble getting the pics... but amazingly enough i'd say about 85% turned out pretty good...
the link to my gallery.... pages 4 and 5 are the old cars inside the gallery
http://kevinchurch.smu​gmug.com/gallery/19549​71/4external link
http://kevinchurch.smu​gmug.com/gallery/19549​71/5external link

Post #12, Oct 12, 2006 21:02:25


Canon 350D | EF 17-40 f4 L | EF 50 f1.8 | "Kit Lens" | EF 70-200 f2.8 L on order | Sigma 70-300 APO DG Macro | EF 1.4x II L
Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things.

LOG IN TO REPLY
TMR ­ Design
Cream of the Crop
TMR Design's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
23,881 posts
Huntington Station, NY
[MORE/SHARE]

Wow.!!!!! A great example of what the kit lens is capable of doing.
Beautiful pictures.

Post #13, Oct 12, 2006 21:04:29 as a reply to PEACHMAN's post 6 minutes earlier.


Please call me Robert or Rob, not TMR
Gear List & Feedback | The Lighting Academyexternal link
"Art is the elimination of the unnecessary." - Pablo Picasso

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lani ­ Kai
"blissfully unaware"
Lani Kai's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,128 posts
Pure Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

If you're outdoors and you can only take one, take the Sigma. People are never afraid to walk in your way when you take a step back. It always happens when I use my 24-105L instead of my 10-22.
I also like "cutting out" parts of cars; this makes for much more interesting pictures once you've gone through the whole lot with the obligatory three-quarter shots. The 135mm f/2L is my favorite lens for this application.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img81.imageshac​k.us/img81/6792/img444​6oc0.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

I also like the compression effect, assuming no one gets in the way.
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img214.imagesha​ck.us/img214/2576/img4​440mi0.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Post #14, Oct 13, 2006 01:50:10


SmugMug | [URL="http://www.faceb​ook.com/kohei.photo"]F​acebook | [URL="http://twitter.c​om/KoheiNakamura"]Twit​ter | [URL="http://gplus.to/​koheinakamura"]Google+ | [URL="http://500px.com​/KoheiNakamura"]500pxexternal link Equipment list | Colorburnexternal link
Founder, Canon Digital Photographyexternal link group on Facebook

LOG IN TO REPLY
digibeet
Senior Member
digibeet's Avatar
Joined Jan 2005
132 posts
Groningen, Nederland
[MORE/SHARE]

wow

Post #15, Oct 13, 2006 04:38:38


eos M
fd85 f/1.2 :lol:

For more click here

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,002 views & 0 likes for this thread
Classic auto show...best lens to take along...
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.001 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
737 guests, 558 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is MoMoPhoto32250

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.