LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Best Lens for High School Football

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 18 Oct 2006 (Wednesday) 09:13   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
bigjon0107
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
895 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

I am going to be shooting a lot of football for one of the local high schools. What lens would be the best one for me to invest in beacouse of all the lighting issues that the staidums have? I would like to keep it fairly inexpencive, but please post your opinion on what you think the best lens is, and then the best ecnomical choice would be.

Thanks,
Jon

Post #1, Oct 18, 2006 09:13:33


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
KENB
Senior Member
KENB's Avatar
Joined Jun 2005
121 posts
Ojai, Calif.
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi Jon

I have been shooting local highschool football games for the last 2 years. Most fields are not well lit, and a fast lens is a must. I would suggest a 70-200 2.8, or the sigma 120-300 2.8. Both work well. I shoot raw, in manual mode at 2.8 and 1/800-1/1000. PP takes care of underexposure. Good luck with the season.

Ken

Post #2, Oct 18, 2006 09:32:14


Canon Mk3,30D,Canon 10D(IR),Canon 70-200 2.8L,Canon 24-105 4.0L,Sigma 120-300 2.8,Sigma 18-50 2.8EX,Canon 50 1.8,Canon 580EX,Tamron 1.4X,Epson p-2000

kenbrown.smugmug.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete-eos
Goldmember
Pete-eos's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
1,994 posts
SW London UK
[MORE/SHARE]

If you want cheap and can shoot in low light, i'd suggest maybe shooting with a prime.

85mm 1.8
100mm 2.0
135mm 2.8

Apart from that I'd say the 70-200 f4L or 70-300 IS but they may struggle if your shooting in poor light...of course if your budget can stretch go for the 70-200 2.8 Canon or Sigma...

Post #3, Oct 18, 2006 09:35:38


Canon 40D[FS]|EF-S 10-22[Sold]|17-55 f/2.8 IS[Sold]|70-200 f/4L[Sold]|Kenko 1.4xTC[Sold]|430EX[Sold]
Panasonic GF3|20mm f1/.7
:twisted:

LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2005
5,077 posts
san jose
[MORE/SHARE]

Most highschool games are played in the late afternoon/night under pretty bad lights. The ideal lens is probably the 300/2.8 but that cost more than most people's car :D.

If you want something inexpensive, the 200/2.8 would be a good choice. Pair this lens with a 1.4x and you'll have a f4 lens for when the light is still good and when it's getting dark, remove the 1.4x and bump the ISO up or use flash.

Another one is the Sigma 70-200. The zoom is nice when the action is close to you.

Post #4, Oct 18, 2006 09:43:00


Sonny
websiteexternal link|Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
bigjon0107
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
895 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks for all the help guys! This weekend i am renting the Cannon 70-200 f2.8L US to see how it all works out. Thanks again. And if any of yall have any more suggestions i am completly open to them.

-Jon

Post #5, Oct 18, 2006 13:24:42 as a reply to sonnyc's post 3 hours earlier.


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Billginthekeys
Billy the kid
Billginthekeys's Avatar
Joined Nov 2005
7,354 posts
Islamorada, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

my opinon in order:
400 2.8
300 2.8
120-300 2.8 sigma
70-200 2.8

i love the 300 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 combo for football

Post #6, Oct 18, 2006 14:09:02


Mr. the Kid.
Go Canes!
My Galleryexternal linkMy Gear
what the L. just go for it.

LOG IN TO REPLY
calicokat
calicokat is BANNED
calicokat's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
14,720 posts
Southern California
[MORE/SHARE]

I shoot High School games for the local paper. I use a 300 F/2.8L IS and a 70-200 F/2.8L IS. 2.8 is a must for night games, High School stadium lighting can be awful at times. You need the longer lenses for the reach, 135mm is too short most of the time.

Post #7, Oct 18, 2006 14:23:16


"You are going to fall off a cliff trying to get a better shot someday"- My hopeful and loving wife :eek: :twisted:
My Websiteexternal link

My Gear

Calicokat 1990-2007 RIP My Loving Kitty

LOG IN TO REPLY
bigjon0107
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
895 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

alright, i feel realy stupid asking this question but i am really new to this whole photography thing, when you use a say 300 f/2.8, your lins is at a fixed 300 mm right?

Post #8, Oct 19, 2006 00:37:20


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,032 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

bigjon0107 wrote in post #2139799external link
alright, i feel realy stupid asking this question but i am really new to this whole photography thing, when you use a say 300 f/2.8, your lins is at a fixed 300 mm right?

right.

ed rader

Post #9, Oct 19, 2006 00:40:47


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
Joined Feb 2005
11,386 posts
Mayberry
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

There is no economical choice for sports lenses. Trust me.
Probably the most versatile lens for night football with excellent image quality is the Sigma 120-300. The 300mm f/2.8 is sweet, too. At present, I'm using a Sigma 70-200 f/2.8 and a Canon 200L, but neither is really long enough to get facial expressions on a consistent basis.

Post #10, Oct 19, 2006 00:46:05



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
bigjon0107
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Oct 2006
895 posts
Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

thanks, so if i were to only buy one lens would you you suggest one of those or should i go with a zoom telephoto and possibly put a 1.4 or 2x extender it for those longer shots? Or just get the lens beacouse i would need all the speed i can get?

Post #11, Oct 19, 2006 00:46:49


Jon Eilts
Gear List
SportsShooterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
samsen
Cream of the Crop
samsen's Avatar
Joined Apr 2006
6,483 posts
LA
[MORE/SHARE]

Save yourself both the money in long run and headache.
Buy L 70-200 IS 2.8, 2xTC. Use a monopod.
Buying anything cheaper or longer, you'll be paying more...Geting less...

Post #12, Oct 19, 2006 00:50:50


Weak retaliates,
Strong Forgives,
Intelligent Ignores!
Samsen

LOG IN TO REPLY
cwphoto
Go ahead, make my day
cwphoto's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,063 posts
Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Billginthekeys wrote in post #2137374external link
my opinon in order:
400 2.8
300 2.8
120-300 2.8 sigma
70-200 2.8

i love the 300 2.8 and 70-200 2.8 combo for football

Ditto that.

Post #13, Oct 19, 2006 01:27:34


EOS-1D X | EOS 5D Mark III | EOS 600D | EOS-1V HS
L: 14/2.8 II | 17/4 | 24/1.4 II | 24/3.5 II | 35/1.4 | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 100/2.8 Macro IS | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 8-15/4 Fisheye | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 24-105/4 IS | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS.
Sundry: 600EX-RT | 1.4x III | 12 II | 25 II | OC-E4

LOG IN TO REPLY
Woolburr
Mr. PMS Himself
Woolburr's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
66,282 posts
The Tupperware capitol of eastern Oregon...Leicester, NC!
[MORE/SHARE]

The 300 f/2.8L IS is probably the first choice for most people, but it is a bank buster. The 300 f/4L IS is workable...but you will be at ISO 3200 in order to get ample shutter speed....the 70-200 f/2.8L IS is a super lens on a 1.6 crop body....you can get decent shots of action within 10-20 yards of you. Occasionally you will see someone mention a Sigma or Tamron...but they are just too slow focusing for my tastes. The bottom line is that it is not going to be cheap to get a reliable sports lens.

Post #14, Oct 19, 2006 04:02:52


People that know me call me Dan
You'll never be a legitimate photographer until you have an award winning duck in your portfolio!
Crayons,Coloring Book,external link Refrigerator Artexternal link and What I Really Think Aboutexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
BryanP
Senior Member
BryanP's Avatar
Joined Jun 2006
679 posts
Northern California
[MORE/SHARE]

Eh, really hard to go budget savvy here.

The ideal situation would be a 300/2.8 + 70-200/2.8 when you're near the endzone

either way, you will NEED the reach for sure, and you will need 2.8 if you're going to be shooting night games

Post #15, Oct 19, 2006 04:48:32


Canon 1D | Canon 10D | Tamron 17-35/2.8-4 | Tamron 28-75/2.8 | Canon 50/1.8 | Canon 70-200/2.8L
The Daily Californianexternal link Photographer

Equipment- My Complete Gear List
Portfolio - Take a look at my portfolio in SmugMugexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
4,036 views & 0 likes for this thread
Best Lens for High School Football
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00106 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
814 guests, 595 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is N4Ld3

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.