LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Lens hood, UV filter and lens cap - all at once?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 22 Oct 2006 (Sunday) 03:20   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
fi20100
Goldmember
fi20100's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
3,551 posts
Finland
[MORE/SHARE]

Lens hood, UV filter and lens cap... can all three be on at for instance the EF 70-200mm L f/4 at once? Or will there be a problem?

And for that lens, would the B+W UV-filter MRC (010M) be a good one?

Post #1, Oct 22, 2006 03:20:31


Stefan
5D, 5D, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickrexternal link, 5∞pxexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mrfourcows
Goldmember
mrfourcows's Avatar
Joined May 2006
2,108 posts
london
[MORE/SHARE]

you could use all at once, the only problem is that you'll get a black picture.

remove the lens cap when shooting!

and the filter is a good choice.

Post #2, Oct 22, 2006 04:27:56


gear | flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lani ­ Kai
"blissfully unaware"
Lani Kai's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,128 posts
Pure Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

What sort of problem are you anticipating?
Anyway, this is perfectly okay. The only exception to this is lenses with hoods that screw into the filter thread, like with certain Sigma lenses (eg 50mm Macro, 105mm Macro). Since the lens cap and hood both occupy the same thread, it is not possible to have both on simultaneously.
B+W MRC filters are excellent.

Post #3, Oct 22, 2006 04:30:51


SmugMug | [URL="http://www.faceb​ook.com/kohei.photo"]F​acebook | [URL="http://twitter.c​om/KoheiNakamura"]Twit​ter | [URL="http://gplus.to/​koheinakamura"]Google+ | [URL="http://500px.com​/KoheiNakamura"]500pxexternal link Equipment list | Colorburnexternal link
Founder, Canon Digital Photographyexternal link group on Facebook

LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
fi20100's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
3,551 posts
Finland
[MORE/SHARE]

:) Haha, yes of course :) I was just thinking since when I borrowed a 24mm f/2.8 w/ a UV filter, the lens cap seemed to be very loose, and came off in the bag many times. Just wanted to make sure :) Thanks for your reply.

Post #4, Oct 22, 2006 04:33:28


Stefan
5D, 5D, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickrexternal link, 5∞pxexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
fi20100's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
3,551 posts
Finland
[MORE/SHARE]

Thanks Lani Kai. Since I only have the kit lens at the moment, and would really like to start expanding, I just don’t want any bad surprises :)

Post #5, Oct 22, 2006 04:35:14


Stefan
5D, 5D, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickrexternal link, 5∞pxexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Carzee
Cream of the Crop
Joined Mar 2005
6,522 posts
Canberra
[MORE/SHARE]

Firstly, in studio you don't want any of them. Outside IMHO the stupid caps get in the way and take up precious seconds. A UV is the better lens cap. I have to laugh at the little strings holding onto a cap I see dangling from lenses. real tourist look.
Lens hoods I use are the rubber ones -they bend, they collapse and squish into small spaces, they cost little if you lose 'em.

Post #6, Oct 22, 2006 04:41:54


Having a bad day? Feeling down? Bantar Gebang Attitude Enhancement Imagesexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
fi20100
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
fi20100's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
3,551 posts
Finland
[MORE/SHARE]

Actually, I think you’re right. Having a UV filter on at all time, the lens cap will probably only be on the lens when it’s in a bag.

Post #7, Oct 22, 2006 04:52:25


Stefan
5D, 5D, 40D + 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200L, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, 100L Macro and some other stuff.
flickrexternal link, 5∞pxexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
SkipD's Avatar
Joined Dec 2002
19,852 posts
Southeastern WI, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

fi20100 wrote in post #2152483external link
Lens hood, UV filter and lens cap... can all three be on at for instance the EF 70-200mm L f/4 at once? Or will there be a problem?

And for that lens, would the B+W UV-filter MRC (010M) be a good one?

You can forget the UV filter under most conditions. The only time that it might make any sense at all to use one is if you are shooting at the beach with blowing sand and/or salty sea spray.

Make sure you always use the lens hood - whenever the lens is on the camera. It will not only provide protection against stray light, but will provide a tremendous amount of physical protection as well. There are many threads in this forum describing this.

Many of my lenses go into the camera case with their hoods in a ready-to-use position. Those with hoods long enough to keep other things in the case from contacting the front element of the lens don't even get a cap put on them when in the case. Those lenses with very wide hoods (such as my 16-35L) get a cap put on them without removing the hood. Those lenses that are too long to go in the case with the hood in a ready-to-use position (such as my 70-200 f/2.8L IS) get the hood mounted in reverse with a cap mounted when stored in the case.

Use proper cleaning procedures for your lenses - the goal of which is to NEVER grind any dirt into the lens - and you will have no problem with scratches. None of my 40-year-old (and well used) lenses have any scratches, and I have never had a filter on any of them except for occasional creative purposes.

Post #8, Oct 22, 2006 06:33:41


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and almost 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Lani ­ Kai
"blissfully unaware"
Lani Kai's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,128 posts
Pure Michigan
[MORE/SHARE]

You should remove the hood if you're using flash, though.

Post #9, Oct 22, 2006 07:47:02


SmugMug | [URL="http://www.faceb​ook.com/kohei.photo"]F​acebook | [URL="http://twitter.c​om/KoheiNakamura"]Twit​ter | [URL="http://gplus.to/​koheinakamura"]Google+ | [URL="http://500px.com​/KoheiNakamura"]500pxexternal link Equipment list | Colorburnexternal link
Founder, Canon Digital Photographyexternal link group on Facebook

LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
SkipD's Avatar
Joined Dec 2002
19,852 posts
Southeastern WI, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Lani Kai wrote in post #2152960external link
You should remove the hood if you're using flash, though.

This is true only if one is trying to use the camera's built-in flash. A Speedlite will be high enough to clear any lens hood in the Canon line, and the original poster has a 430EX.

Post #10, Oct 22, 2006 08:17:54


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and almost 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
jr_senator's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
4,861 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

SkipD wrote in post #2152825external link
You can forget the UV filter under most conditions. The only time that it might make any sense at all to use one is if you are shooting at the beach with blowing sand and/or salty sea spray.

Make sure you always use the lens hood - whenever the lens is on the camera. It will not only provide protection against stray light, but will provide a tremendous amount of physical protection as well. There are many threads in this forum describing this.

Many of my lenses go into the camera case with their hoods in a ready-to-use position. Those with hoods long enough to keep other things in the case from contacting the front element of the lens don't even get a cap put on them when in the case. Those lenses with very wide hoods (such as my 16-35L) get a cap put on them without removing the hood. Those lenses that are too long to go in the case with the hood in a ready-to-use position (such as my 70-200 f/2.8L IS) get the hood mounted in reverse with a cap mounted when stored in the case.

Use proper cleaning procedures for your lenses - the goal of which is to NEVER grind any dirt into the lens - and you will have no problem with scratches. None of my 40-year-old (and well used) lenses have any scratches, and I have never had a filter on any of them except for occasional creative purposes.

Damn fine advice, I would just add...don't use the collapsible, rubber hoods. They don't properly protect a lens.

Post #11, Oct 22, 2006 08:39:10



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
PetKal
Cream of the Crop
PetKal's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
11,141 posts
Nizza, Italia
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

fi20100 wrote in post #2152483external link
Lens hood, UV filter and lens cap... can all three be on at for instance the EF 70-200mm L f/4 at once? Or will there be a problem?

Not likely as long as you:
(1) Take the lens mount cap off before attempting to couple the lens onto your camera body.
(2) Remove the lens dust cup just before depressing the shutter.

Post #12, Oct 22, 2006 08:47:28


Potenza-Walore-Prestigio

LOG IN TO REPLY
Anders ­ Östberg
Goldmember
Anders Östberg's Avatar
Joined Nov 2003
3,395 posts
Sweden
[MORE/SHARE]

Carzee wrote in post #2152626external link
Firstly, in studio you don't want any of them.
...

I would disagree with that, you can get flare indoors just as easily as from the sun, not least in the studio with strobes or strong lights. Use a hood at all times...

Post #13, Oct 22, 2006 09:05:23


Anders Östberg - Mostly Canon gear - My photosexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
SkipD
Cream of the Crop
SkipD's Avatar
Joined Dec 2002
19,852 posts
Southeastern WI, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

jr_senator wrote in post #2153106external link
Damn fine advice, I would just add...don't use the collapsible, rubber hoods. They don't properly protect a lens.

You are absolutely right about the caution against using the collapsible rubber hoods. I should have included that in my other post. One should only use properly designed (for the particular lens/body combination) rigid lens hoods for the best results.

Most collapsible rubber lens hoods don't provide the proper shielding from stray light and for sure don't provide the same level of mechanical protection from everyday knocking around or crashing to a hard surface.

I can attest to the level of protection that a properly designed rigid (metal in this particular case) hood can provide against a major crash (a 4-foot drop to concrete, lens-first). That happened 38 years ago, and the lens and body are still in good shape without repair work being required. I did replace the hood for aesthetic reasons, though.

Post #14, Oct 22, 2006 09:23:39


Skip Douglas
A few cameras and almost 50 years behind them .....
..... but still learning all the time.

LOG IN TO REPLY
jr_senator
Goldmember
jr_senator's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
4,861 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

SkipD wrote in post #2153248external link
I did replace the hood for aesthetic reasons, though.

Hay, if one can afford to be vain...

Post #15, Oct 22, 2006 12:05:31



LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
19,548 views & 0 likes for this thread
Lens hood, UV filter and lens cap - all at once?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00112 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
735 guests, 604 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is MoMoPhoto32250

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.