![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 101
|
I actually never gave much thought to the brand for UV filters. I usually use whatever brand the store I buy from has displayed most pominently. Usually, this is Hoya.
What are your favorite filter brands? |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Boosting Ruler Sales
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 4,164
|
I like B+W, but Hoya (especially the Multi-Coated) is probably very close.
The latest thing (that I have noticed) is the 'slim' filter designed to prevent vignetting. If you are entirely digital, this is not worth chasing, since the crop factor reduces the Angle Of View. Nice idea for film, though (and perhaps the EF-S lens). Have Fun Rick |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
MKIII Aficionado
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 9,857
|
I use Canon (go figure).
__________________
defordphoto | Celebrating the art of photography® SD500, 10D, 20D, 30D, 5D, 1DMKII, 1DMKIII www.ussbaracing.com | www.rfmsports.com | www.nwfjcc.com An austere and pleasant poetry of the real. Ansel Adams |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 672
|
my 100 2.0 has a canon and so does my 28-90 4.5 go figure, probaly the filter on that lens is worth more than the lens. Got that with my Elan 7e and found out how poor it is when I put it on my 10D.
Is Canon a good quality filter? (UV)
__________________
1Ds Mark III,1D Mark III, 5D II Canon 16-35 f/2.8L, 24-70 f/2.8 L, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.2 L, 24-105 f/4L IS, 50 f/1.4, 300 2.8 L IS 580 EX II (2) Quantum T5D-R flash (2) http://www.kyserphoto.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 13
|
I'm using B+W on my 28-135 and the rest are using Hoya. I like the B+W mainly because of the MRC coat which makes it really easy to clean..
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 1,058
|
I have a
B+W for 28-135IS Canon Haze UV-1 Glass Filter (L-39 Sharp Cut) for the 70-200 2.8 IS Sunpak UV for the 17-40L Sunpak UV for the 75-300IS Yes, you can say I got it wrong, I have expensive stuff for the 28-135 (inexpensive) lense, and cheap filter for the 17-40L. That's true. I don't really notice the diff; and if its a critical shot, I"ll take off the filter in any case. I am planning to get something better for the 17-40 though.
__________________
1D Mark II and stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 11
|
I'm using a B+W MCR. I didn't like the canon. It affected my auto-focus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 950
|
B+W is my first choice & then Hoya all of my filters is multicoated.
__________________
$$$ in Canon Gear & Lighting Equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Admin - MOD OF STEEL...
|
I have not decided!
My Canon filters are becoming scratched just by looking at them.. The Hoya caused my Sigma 70-200mm to go all "backfocus" on me... so I think I need to try a B&W.
__________________
-DRY SEASON- 21 days across Namibia and Botswana Main Gallery GEAR LIST CDS' HOT LINKS My POTN Share Threads Are you shooting HAMSTTR©? ".. It's the customer support Stupid... ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Cream of the Proverbial Crop
Landscape and Cityscape Photographer 2006 Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Back in Warwickshire and the weather sucks....
Posts: 12,151
|
I use Hoya Super HMC PRO, they cost a little more but worth it (possibly)
Check out this thread if any of you missed it:- http://photography-on-the.net/forum/...amp;highlight= Neil
__________________
Neil - © NHR Photography There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs. ~ Ansel Adams
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Guttenberg, NJ
Posts: 125
|
Any comments on Tiffen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, Fl.
Posts: 1
|
I realize this is an old post but it warrented a reply
Tiffen are not coated and more prone to lens flare - (use lens hood) As far as Bob Atkins UV tests : ![]() "This last plot makes the order of UV absorbing effectiveness quite clear * The Tiffen Haze-1 is best. It's a neutral filter so color balance is unaffected. * Next is the Tiffen 812. Good UV blocking if you also want a warming filter * The Hoya 81B warming filter is quite similar to the Tiffen 812. * The Hoya UV filter comes next, neutral, but with 2 stops of UV blocking. * The B+W KR1.5 gives about 1.5 stops of UV blocking with slight warming. * The Tiffen polarizer gives less than a stop of UV blocking - but that's not why you use a polarizer! * The B+W UV and Hoya 1B aren't very effective UV blockers. The 1B is slightly warming * The three "generics" and the Tiffen UV protector are pretty useless for blocking UV, though they may make fine, neutral, lens protectors." the later was taken from the above Bob Atkins link and was Last Modified 05/13/2005 18:30:19 so it should be still a usfull and fairly upto date test resource for UV Filters. Personally, I'd like to see several other commercial grade as well as some other pro filters added to this UV filter test to make it more complete - but that is was all i found with a quick browse. chase |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
|
B+W are very very nice filters. However Hoya filters are nice replacements.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WTB : Filter step-up ring (77mm thread, 82mm filter) | NAisBEST | Classifieds: Buy | 0 | 16th of October 2006 (Mon) 14:30 |
| Its a bird, its a plane, ohh look at that sunset, its.....(video game related thread) | Billginthekeys | The POTN Lounge | 5 | 12th of September 2006 (Tue) 23:16 |
| Does filter brand matter? | Punisher77 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 59 | 18th of July 2006 (Tue) 14:37 |
| Need CP filter. Does brand matter? | Neon01 | Accessories & Storage | 16 | 15th of October 2005 (Sat) 20:12 |
| Need a CP filter. Does brand matter? | Neon01 | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 0 | 5th of October 2005 (Wed) 12:35 |