Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 17 Nov 2006 (Friday) 21:07
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM

 
stathunter
Cream of the Crop
stathunter's Avatar
5,606 posts
Joined Aug 2006
California & Michigan
Feb 15, 2008 07:24 |  #181

Wow some great shots here. I was thinking of picking up that lens but have been seriously thinking about the 300 f4 IS to go with my 1.4 ---that might be a better fit for me.


Scott
"Do or do not, there is no try"

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
snapper ­ seven
Member
33 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Essex, UK
Feb 16, 2008 10:59 as a reply to stathunter's post |  #182

You guys aren't helping much!!!!

I popped into these forums to check out people's views on the EF converters to go with my 70-200 2.8L and now after seeing this thread I am having to seriously consider this lens again...after agonisingly deciding that I could do with out it because of the weight and cost etc.

I feel like I need to go and have a cold shower now.

Ok just out of interest - how much better would this lens be (for motorsport) compared to the 70-200 2.8L and a 1.4x or 2x converter?
Appreciate your objective and non biased (given the thread we are in!) views.

Thanks

SS




LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
canonloader's Avatar
52,875 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Behind A Camera
Feb 16, 2008 11:19 |  #183

after agonisingly deciding that I could do with out it because of the weight and cost

Also consider the 300/4. It works quite well with a 1.4x converter to gives 420mm and keeps AF. It also has the same size objective lens as the 400/5.6 and is shorter and lighter.


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
My Microscope Stuffexternal link
Gear List, My You Tubeexternal link
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Perry Ge's Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Joined Jul 2007
Hong Kong
Feb 22, 2008 22:20 |  #184

You guys have pretty much sold me on this lens. The IQ and AF look perfect for what I wanna shoot with it - birds and airshows.

The only thing holding me back and even considering the 100-400 IS is not so much the image stabilisation, but the fact that the zoom will actually fit in my bag!! :lol:


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

LOG IN TO REPLY
aladyforty
Goldmember
aladyforty's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
Albany: Western Australia
Feb 26, 2008 18:13 |  #185

a few more

All handheld ISO500 F6.3

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm4.static.fl​ickr.com ...90585409_68535bc334​_o.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com ...78511073_15d60f1d43​_o.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com ...65322817_0e7f87c918​_o.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://farm3.static.fl​ickr.com ...66211661_948e1cdae4​_o.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Redirected to error image by FLICKR

5DIII 7DII bunch canon Ls Fuji X100
My page https://www.flickr.com​/photos/25426422@N00/ (external link)
Birding page https://www.flickr.com​/photos/59111660@N08/ (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
jacobsen1
Cream of the Crop
jacobsen1's Avatar
9,629 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Mt View, RI
Feb 27, 2008 08:06 as a reply to aladyforty's post |  #186

perryge wrote in post #4975726external link
The only thing holding me back and even considering the 100-400 IS is not so much the image stabilisation, but the fact that the zoom will actually fit in my bag!! :lol:

Seriously consider the 300mm f/4. Nothing against this lens, but the 300 is smaller and has IS. With the 1.4TC you get a 420 f/5.6 WITH IS... Yes you take a slight hit (not much though) in IQ but you gain IS. Depends on how bad you need 400, IS and how much the size effects your bag and whether you'll use it or not.

They're both fantastic lenses so you can't go wrong really.


My Gear List

my sites:
benjacobsenphoto.comexternal link | newschoolofphotography​.comexternal link
GND buyers FAQ

FOR SALE: 5Dii RRS L-bracket, 430II, 12mm macro tube PM ME!

LOG IN TO REPLY
gardengirl13
Goldmember
gardengirl13's Avatar
1,798 posts
Joined Feb 2006
US
Feb 28, 2008 09:00 |  #187

Yeah but he already has (and loves) the 200, with a TC he'll have 300 covered, the 400 would be a nice addition.

perryge since you like primes so much I wouldn't recommend the 100-400 zoom, you'd be much happier with the 400. Once I pay off my car the 400 is my next lens even though I'll need a better tripod for it!


photosexternal link
http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​205171

LOG IN TO REPLY
Perry ­ Ge
Batteries? We don't need no...   . . . or cards.
Perry Ge's Avatar
12,266 posts
Gallery: 83 photos
Joined Jul 2007
Hong Kong
Feb 28, 2008 12:03 |  #188

gardengirl13 wrote in post #5012565external link
Yeah but he already has (and loves) the 200, with a TC he'll have 300 covered, the 400 would be a nice addition.

perryge since you like primes so much I wouldn't recommend the 100-400 zoom, you'd be much happier with the 400. Once I pay off my car the 400 is my next lens even though I'll need a better tripod for it!

I must admit I'm still teetering. The 300 is out of the question, because yes, my 200L is amazing. And the lens will be used mostly for birding, with the occasional airshow, so native 400mm is crucial.

But the IS and smaller size of the 100-400 are so appealing, since I fly a LOT. The 400L's cheaper price, weight, and AF are really nice though. Hardest decision ever!


Perry | www.perryge.com (external link) | flickr (external link) | C&C always welcome | Market Feedback & Gear | Sharpening sticky | Perspective sticky

LOG IN TO REPLY
Ronald ­ S. ­ Jr.
Prodigal "Brick" Layer
Ronald S. Jr.'s Avatar
16,257 posts
Gallery: 9 photos
Joined Aug 2005
Sayre, Pennsylvania
Mar 20, 2008 16:08 |  #189

A few from me from late last summer

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v611/remulac/hunting.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v611/remulac/heron-1.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v611/remulac/foxpost.jpg

IMAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v611/remulac/heron2post-1.jpg

Mac users swear by their computers. PC users swear at theirs.

LOG IN TO REPLY
cadams
Senior Member
cadams's Avatar
983 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Brookfield, WI
Mar 21, 2008 14:45 as a reply to Ronald S. Jr.'s post |  #190

Ron I love the last image


http://www.ccaphotos.c​omexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
spicolli1976
Member
spicolli1976's Avatar
235 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Mar 21, 2008 15:18 |  #191

This lens works great for surfing as well!!!!!

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Canon 50D with grip, Canon Rebel XTI with grip, Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS USM, Canon 400 f5.6L USM, Canon 50mm f1.4, 580 EX II, Speedlite 430 EX www.thestonichcollecti​on.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
gooble
Goldmember
gooble's Avatar
3,149 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Mesa,AZ
Mar 21, 2008 21:50 |  #192

Was something gnawing on that fox's ears?




LOG IN TO REPLY
Fawlcon
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Mar 23, 2008 07:08 |  #193

This isn't helping my decision between the prime and the zoom for wildlife :(




LOG IN TO REPLY
canonloader
Cream of the Crop
canonloader's Avatar
52,875 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Behind A Camera
Mar 23, 2008 07:16 |  #194

Unless your shooting wildlife inside of 17 feet or big animals and birds, [Buffalo and eagles] inside of 30 feet, then it's a no brainer. Just keep in mind that a lens with IS takes from half a second to .9 second, before it is ready to fire. That's a long, long time in the animal world. The prime has none of those drawbacks. :)


Mitch- ____...^.^...____
My Microscope Stuffexternal link
Gear List, My You Tubeexternal link
War is not about who's right, it's about who's left.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Fawlcon
Mostly Lurking
16 posts
Joined Nov 2007
Mar 23, 2008 08:51 |  #195

:s. And I love the lens hood too...butttt I like the 300 f/4LIS too :s Or even the f2.8 if I can scramble up three times the dosh.

Butt...hmm. Zoom :(




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,106,418 views & 489 likes for this thread
Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L USM
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00301 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is matc94
980 guests, 677 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5577, that happened on Mar 02, 2016