LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


EF 85 1.2L for indoor sports

FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk
Thread started 19 Nov 2006 (Sunday) 14:40   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
ust82gopher
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2006
253 posts
Minneapolis, MN
[MORE/SHARE]

I have a terrible gym light situation for basketball this year. Lousy enough, that I had trouble this weekend with my 70-200 2.8L IS.

Distance is not an issue as I can be almost right on top of the court. So, I am seriously considering investing in the EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM. (Use it for the season and likely sell it afterwards for a few hundred less). But I have seen several reviews that say that the AF is rather slow. If so, that would be a serious negative to me and I would probably not invest.

Does anyone here us the EF 85mm f/1.2L II in low light shooting sports (basketball preferably)? Can you comment on the AF?

Thanks.

Tim

Post #1, Nov 19, 2006 14:40:52


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
illy
Senior Member
illy's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
649 posts
London
[MORE/SHARE]

I don't own the lens but have heard that the AF is very slow (as it has to move all that glass around). The f/1.8 is significantly faster and if worst comes to worst shoot in RAW and underexpose by 1/3 of a stop to get the same aperture.

Post #2, Nov 19, 2006 14:44:20


Flickrexternal link
600D, 17-50, 50, 60, 100, 70-200, 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
mshill
Senior Member
Joined Jun 2006
132 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I would be concerned about depth of field at that large an aperature, especially with sports. With the 70-200 2.8 IS you should be able to shoot ISO 1600 F/4 and maintain 1/250th shutter speed.

I shot a cheer competition that was very poorly lit with the above settings and got very good results with my Sigma 70-200 EX APO. I had to use aome serious noise reduction software, however, of the 1700 shots I took, I ended up with about 700 acceptable quality shots (printable at 5x7) and about 200 really good shots that would look great at 8x10.

I doubt that a gym could be worse lit than an auditorium with only stage lights and three spots to light the action.

Post #3, Nov 19, 2006 14:57:07 as a reply to illy's post 12 minutes earlier.


50D, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, Canon 70-200 f2.8L, Kenko 1.5x Extender, Sigma EF-500 DG ST + Fong Dong

LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
Joined Feb 2005
11,386 posts
Mayberry
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

You need the 85mm f/1.8 lens. I use it to shoot basketball throughout the season, and it's autofocus is much faster than the f/1.2 version. You need to maintain a shutter of at least 1/400 with 1/500 being optimal for basketball. I also use ISO 1600 and f/2.2 when I shoot. Samples of my basketball shots are on my Smugmug site (link below).

Post #4, Nov 19, 2006 15:02:07



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2006
253 posts
Minneapolis, MN
[MORE/SHARE]

mshill wrote in post #2285796external link
With the 70-200 2.8 IS you should be able to shoot ISO 1600 F/4 and maintain 1/250th shutter speed.

That is the basic settings I used last year and got 60%+ acceptable shots after using a Noise Ninja profile I set up. But for some reason, there is less light this year (and somewhat yellow). Not sure why..if it's the lights are just dimmer or something else in the gym is reducing effective lighting.

Post #5, Nov 19, 2006 15:11:40


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2006
253 posts
Minneapolis, MN
[MORE/SHARE]

liza wrote in post #2285805external link
You need the 85mm f/1.8 lens. I use it to shoot basketball throughout the season, and it's autofocus is much faster than the f/1.2 version. You need to maintain a shutter of at least 1/400 with 1/500 being optimal for basketball. I also use ISO 1600 and f/2.2 when I shoot. Samples of my basketball shots are on my Smugmug site (link below).

Liza,

Thanks so much for the hints. I am going to seriously investigate the 85 f/1.8.

Tim

Post #6, Nov 19, 2006 15:13:09


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bill ­ Roberts
revolting peasant
Bill Roberts's Avatar
Joined Apr 2006
3,079 posts
UK
[MORE/SHARE]

I have the 85mm 1.2 II and it's an excellent lens for what it was designed for, but even with the improved focus over the original version it's never going to be front runner for sports use. It's not impossible of course, but hardly the first choice. You'd be far far better off getting the 85mm 1.8 if your primary use is sport rather than portraits.

Bill

Post #7, Nov 19, 2006 15:15:27


BiLL

LOG IN TO REPLY
radiohead
Goldmember
radiohead's Avatar
Joined Jun 2006
1,372 posts
Hampshire, UK
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

I agree with Bill here - the 85/1.2L is a staggeringly good lens for its intended purpose, and that's not sport. Look to the 85/1.8/100/2, 135/2L trio for that.

Post #8, Nov 19, 2006 15:50:23


Guy Collier Photography - Documentary Wedding Photographerexternal link
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt
"It's no good saying "hold it" to a moment in real life." - Lord Snowdon
My kit

LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
Joined Feb 2005
11,386 posts
Mayberry
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

The 50mm prime is also great for under the basket shots. And I LOVE the 100 f/2, because I like to shoot tight.

Post #9, Nov 19, 2006 15:52:42



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcw122
Goldmember
jcw122's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
1,940 posts
West Chester, PA
[MORE/SHARE]

The 85 1.2 AF is slow for a reason, it's slow to get very accurate focusing.

Post #10, Nov 19, 2006 16:06:44


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

LOG IN TO REPLY
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2006
253 posts
Minneapolis, MN
[MORE/SHARE]

liza wrote in post #2285969external link
And I LOVE the 100 f/2, because I like to shoot tight.

Liza,

I have the 135 f/2 on my Christmas List. Is there any advantage/performance difference shooting sports (other than reach, obviously), between the 135 f/2 and the 100 f/2?

Post #11, Nov 19, 2006 16:21:28


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ust82gopher
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2006
253 posts
Minneapolis, MN
[MORE/SHARE]

Bill Roberts wrote in post #2285849external link
You'd be far far better off getting the 85mm 1.8 if your primary use is sport rather than portraits.

Bill

Thanks Bill. Sports is the use, so I think the 85 f/1.8 is the answer!

Post #12, Nov 19, 2006 16:23:12


Tim
Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
cwphoto
Go ahead, make my day
cwphoto's Avatar
Joined Oct 2005
2,063 posts
Kellyville, Baulkham Hills, Cumberland, NSW, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

jcw122 wrote in post #2286016external link
The 85 1.2 AF is slow for a reason, it's slow to get very accurate focusing.

Nah, it's just slow because of it's focus design.

Post #13, Nov 19, 2006 17:28:59


EOS-1D X | EOS 5D Mark III | EOS 600D | EOS-1V HS
L: 14/2.8 II | 17/4 | 24/1.4 II | 24/3.5 II | 35/1.4 | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 100/2.8 Macro IS | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 8-15/4 Fisheye | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-70/2.8 II | 24-105/4 IS | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS.
Sundry: 600EX-RT | 1.4x III | 12 II | 25 II | OC-E4

LOG IN TO REPLY
liza
Cream of the Crop
Joined Feb 2005
11,386 posts
Mayberry
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

ust82gopher wrote in post #2286075external link
Liza,

I have the 135 f/2 on my Christmas List. Is there any advantage/performance difference shooting sports (other than reach, obviously), between the 135 f/2 and the 100 f/2?

The 135 reportedly has superior image quality. I like the 100 because I shoot from the sidelines and the 135 would be a bit too long. I would like to have the f/2 version of it (I have the f/2.8.) for volleyball, though.

Post #14, Nov 19, 2006 17:37:42



Elizabeth
Blog
http://www.emc2foto.bl​ogspot.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
mrclark321
Noinker
mrclark321's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
7,508 posts
.... with a long history
[MORE/SHARE]

You could sell the 70-200L and get a 85 1.8 and a 135L.
When I had the 85L I tried it on my daughters skating and gymnastics with no luck.
It's not what it's designed for and you would only end up being frustrated.
Crank up the ISO and use noise ninja if it's a problem.

Dan

Post #15, Nov 19, 2006 18:16:17


A crap pile of various gear!

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,472 views & 0 likes for this thread
EF 85 1.2L for indoor sports
FORUMS Photography Talk by Genre Sports Talk



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00085 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1062 guests, 883 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is willz1986

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.