![]() |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
|
Can't do that. My main sports are fastpitch softball and track. The 70-200 L is absolutely the perfect lens. Here is an example
![]() Just need something to cover me this winter and the price of the 85 f/1.8 makes great sense.
__________________
Tim Gear List: Canon 5Dmk II and 7D, EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM, EF-S 17-85MM f4-5.6 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4.0L IS USM, EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM, EF 135 f/2.0L USM, Extender EF 2x II, Speedlite 580EX and 430EX |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#17 |
|
Member
|
I was in what sounds like a similar situation in that the 70-200 /2.8 just wasn't cutting it. Just got 85 /1.8 and worked ok today for b-ball. Just will take time for me to adjust to foot zooming! 85mm seemed too long for under the basket and too short for other end of the court (IMO) so I had to move around alot. Kind of wished I had a 50mm 1.4
__________________
New camera - Learning and Loving it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Cream of the Crop
|
50 1.4, 85 1.8, 100 2 are the primes of choice for basketball(on most of the cameras).
If you are full frame, the 135L is awesome. You defintely need a shutter of at least 1/400. 1/320 is pushing it. Last edited by grego : 20th of November 2006 (Mon) at 02:07. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#19 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,801
|
I've got the 85 f/1.8 and 70-200 f/2.8 IS. For high school indoor sports on a crop camera will the 135mm be too long a lens? Would it be a mistake to shoot from the bleachers with this lens rather than being along the court with a shorter focal length lens?
__________________
Nikon D3, D300, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2, 300 f/2.8, 14-24, 24-70, 70-200, SB-800x4, SB-900, SU-800, (3) Sunpak 120J (2) Profoto Acute 2400s,Chimera softboxes, (4)PW Multimax, (6) C-stands, (3) Bogen Superbooms, Autopoles Last edited by RichNY : 20th of November 2006 (Mon) at 02:09. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 513
|
I shoot from the stands a great deal. I see absolutely no problem using the 135L from the bleachers. In fact you may enjoy it more, because you are able to oversee the whole court.
What you will get is a different perspective to your shots as opposed to being on the floor. Depends on what you are looking for in your shots. A lot of people I know shoot a game from both the court-level and the stands. Sure, you have to hustle around a little more, but I always enjoy being in the crowd. I think it all depends on what kind of photos you want. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mayberry
Posts: 11,386
|
I shoot from a crouched position along the baseline, mostly where the 3 point line intersects. I also migrate to the sideline and under basket spots, depending on the action. When you "shoot low," it makes the players appear larger.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Indoor sports w/ 70-200 f/4 | asysin2leads | Sports Talk | 21 | 4th of June 2007 (Mon) 20:24 |
| 5D for indoor sports? | Galaxy99 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 2 | 8th of May 2007 (Tue) 13:48 |
| 50 f1.4 vs. 1.8 for indoor sports | psurrette | Sports Talk | 6 | 20th of August 2006 (Sun) 02:35 |
| Expodisc for Indoor Sports? | jmcgurn@kc.rr.com | Sports | 5 | 9th of August 2006 (Wed) 10:39 |
| HELP PLEASE - Indoor sports - how low can you go? | cojoneka | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 14 | 28th of May 2004 (Fri) 13:05 |