Index  •   • New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New Posts  •   • RTAT  •   • "Best Of"  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 23 Nov 2006 (Thursday) 02:41
PREV/NEXT

Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro

 
Pat
Member
Pat's Avatar
180 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Port Stephens, NSW Australia
MORE INFO

Has anyone used this lens? would like to see some photos and opinions.

Nov 23, 2006 02:41

Canon 5D11 with various lenses, mostly primes.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
mrkgoo
Goldmember
2,288 posts
Joined Aug 2006
MORE INFO

I don't think anyone has ever used this lens.  :p


Kidding, I have it and it's one of my favourites. A great focal length, since it's only very slightly tele (equiv of about 90mm), it's superb for so many applications - portraits, landscape, general purpose...oh yeah, and macro.

It's fast at 2.8, has really nice build, and EXTREMELY sharp! Perhaps my sharpest lens. Awesome size and weight too. I think the ONLY problem I have with it is that it's focussing is slightly on the slow side (fast for a macro, but macro lenses tend to be slightly slower for that extra accuracy. Or something). Oh, it has reaosonably bad light fall off at 2.8, but only when taking non-macro.

Some unedited samples:

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img220.imagesha​ck.us/img220/2012/img0​567ey6.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img208.imagesha​ck.us/img208/2241/img2​683ka2.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img220.imagesha​ck.us/img220/2894/img2​825kr4.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img220.imagesha​ck.us/img220/6476/img4​359au1.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img220.imagesha​ck.us/img220/466/img54​20am0.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Nov 23, 2006 03:18



LOG IN TO REPLY
Pat
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
Pat's Avatar
180 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Port Stephens, NSW Australia
MORE INFO

Thanks for that! I am impressed :)

Nov 23, 2006 03:45 as a reply to mrkgoo's post 27 minutes earlier.

Canon 5D11 with various lenses, mostly primes.

LOG IN TO REPLY
J ­ Rabin
Goldmember
1,496 posts
Joined Aug 2004

NJ
MORE INFO

People who carp about EF-S lenses carp. People who use this lens recognize its optical performance is truly something special in Canon's lens lineup. This is my writeup:http://postit.rutgers.​edu ...ro%5FWork%5FDistanc​e1.pdfexternal link.
Here's a typical shot: http://aesop.rutgers.e​du ...yBreeding_DMerritt_​52.htmexternal link

I am an old 1970s Olympus OM guy (great macro optics for those remembering the 90mm f/2) who became a Nikon guy in the autofocus 90s and appreciated Nikon's 60mm f/2.8 micro Nikkor for portability, who became a never look back Canon digital guy, and waited to Canon to make a 60mm macro.
They did. Just happens to be EF-S. This lens is so good, alone it made me keep an APS-C sensor body instead of moving to a 5D! It trounces the 60mm micro Nikkor and even the legendary Oly 90 f/2 in performance. It's that good.
Jack

Nov 23, 2006 07:09 as a reply to Pat's post 3 hours earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
kidpower
Senior Member
513 posts
Joined Apr 2005
MORE INFO

I think the guys above said it all. It's an oustanding lens. I only rarely shoot macro with it and use it for general out and about photos.

It has a perfect, solid feel on my XT, and is very very sharp.

Nov 23, 2006 07:20 as a reply to J Rabin's post 11 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Lightstream
Yoda
14,915 posts
Joined Feb 2006

Cult of the Full Frame
MORE INFO

J Rabin wrote in post #2303065external link
They did. Just happens to be EF-S. This lens is so good, alone it made me keep an APS-C sensor body instead of moving to a 5D! It trounces the 60mm micro Nikkor and even the legendary Oly 90 f/2 in performance. It's that good.
Jack


That's why I am having such a difficult time deciding whether I want to sell this lens to move to the 100mm macro. Its performance is absolutely mind blowing - and this little EF-S lens scares all the L's in my gear bag.

I like it so much I adapted it to fit the 1D 1.3X crop factor platform, although I did not succeed in moving it to full frame because the mirror is simply too big to clear the rear element.

Interesting observation: It DOES NOT vignette on a 1D. There is enough image area that completely black vignetting is absent, although there is minor light falloff at normal working distances wide open (although some have noted this is a concern at f/2.8 normal tele range on a 1.6X platform too)

Nov 23, 2006 07:28



LOG IN TO REPLY
George ­ Chew
Goldmember
George Chew's Avatar
1,635 posts

Joined Nov 2004

Ipoh, Malaysia
MORE INFO

Greetings,
This is the sharpest lens I had. I have to let it go very reluctantly as I upgrade to 5D. This is the parting shot. Enjoy...

IMAGE: http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f367/gckw8833/Flower/_MG_0692.jpg

Nov 23, 2006 08:22 as a reply to Lightstream's post 53 minutes earlier.

5DII and a few L lenses.

LOG IN TO REPLY
aladyforty
Goldmember
aladyforty's Avatar
2,995 posts

Joined Dec 2005

Albany: Western Australia
MORE INFO

as everyone has said before, its a great sharp lens. I wont part with mine.

Nov 23, 2006 09:16

5DIII 7DII 1DIII and a bunch canon Ls
My page https://www.flickr.com​/photos/25426422@N00/
Birding page https://www.flickr.com​/photos/59111660@N08/

LOG IN TO REPLY
kidpower
Senior Member
513 posts
Joined Apr 2005
MORE INFO

Here is a flower shot with the 60 EFS macro. XT, F8, ISO 100, 1/40, crop, RAW, sharpened some. I shoot very little macro and there is probably camera shake in this photo as it's hard to steady the hands bending over and crouching. I should have upped the shutter speed. For the serious macro person with tripod and all that, it's capable of stunning results.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Nov 23, 2006 09:21 as a reply to George Chew's post 59 minutes earlier.



LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
20,863 posts

Joined Mar 2005

Birmingham, UK
MORE INFO

This lens is really very good indeed in all respects, including build. Ultra sharp, sharpest I've ever had, and capable of genuine 3D poppin' looking shots. AF is on the slow side and tends to hunt, but it is a Macro and they all seem to be the same. I use MF for Macro anyway.

I posted some fast and loose samples here: Click

Nov 23, 2006 12:31

http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
illy
Senior Member
illy's Avatar
649 posts

Joined Aug 2006

London
MORE INFO

My Favourite Lens.

FOV is around 96mm on the crops so it equals out to the 100mm macro on a FF. An effective 100mm FOV makes it a good portraiture lens (mainly what I use it for), the bokeh is smooth and creamy - a problem you may encounter when shooting in bright light is that when you stop down to f/5.6 - f/8.0 it becomes too sharp and people might complain about the texture of their skin - isn't that a great disadvantage ... too sharp :lol:

The AF is smooth and silent ... USM ... I haven't many lenses to compare the speed to so I can't really say. In low light I use it with my flash so that it focuses with the assist light.

The lens is very well built; I've dragged mine everywhere and have only have a couple of scratches. I recommend getting the hood with it, it’s very good, and protects the lens well (of course remove for macro) - also flare is very well controlled, even without the hood.

If you want a good macro lens (may be too short for some insects ... its more an object macro lens) that can double up for portraiture, tack sharp, well built, cheap, good bokeh, go for this one.

Here is my gallery - all the pics are with this lens:

http://beta.zooomr.com​/photos/iliaexternal link

Have a look here at some 100% crops with modest sharpening applied in PS (shot in RAW):

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img69.imageshac​k.us/img69/3764/1rp9.j​pgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'



IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img76.imageshac​k.us/img76/3135/2jf1.j​pgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'



IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img55.imageshac​k.us/img55/1070/3sn7.j​pgexternal link
HTTP response: NOT FOUND | MIME changed to 'image/png'

Nov 23, 2006 12:59 as a reply to condyk's post 27 minutes earlier.

Flickrexternal link
600D, 17-50, 50, 60, 100, 70-200, 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
paulhillion
Goldmember
paulhillion's Avatar
1,392 posts

Joined Jun 2004

Guernsey, UK
MORE INFO

There's been a couple of times when I've thought of selling my 60 macro but then I look back on some of the images it produces and I quickly come to my senses. It's an amazing lens and probably one of the sharpest lenses I've ever used.

Nov 23, 2006 14:18

Website: Clickexternal link
Twitter: Clickexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
kevin_c
Cream of the Crop
5,745 posts
Joined Mar 2005

Devon, England
MORE INFO

As everyone else has said - Get it! I use mine mainly for portraits (human & cats!) but it is a great macro as well :-)

Nov 23, 2006 14:23

-- K e v i n --

Nikon D700, 17-35mm, 28-105mm, 70-200mmVR, 50mm f/1.4
Canon EOS 3, 24-105L, 135L

LOG IN TO REPLY
Max ­ Err
Hatchling
9 posts
Joined Nov 2006
MORE INFO

great lens no doubt, I bought it to pair to my 135L when shooting portraits in confined spaces (on 400d) - well, being great it is still not quite up to the 135L image quality - looking at 100% crops you notice the difference: at 200ISO the former produces more noise in the shadowed areas giving the image a lesser detailed look (more grainy) - this is my cautious verbalization of the lack of "magic" the 135L has and the ef-s60mm hasn't.
but if you consider the price difference it is all nonsense :) and you cant make a true macro with the 135L.

considering macro capabilities this lens is great for everything except fast and nervous insects - you must be too close to them to shoot at 60mm, so if it is the bugs you're after, consider something with a longer working distance (100,150,180 mm).

a flower at 2.8
http://www.pbase.com ...age/70662036/origin​al.jpgexternal link

Nov 23, 2006 14:48



LOG IN TO REPLY
Bonjour43ma
Member
Bonjour43ma's Avatar
192 posts

Joined Aug 2006
MORE INFO

nice

Nov 23, 2006 15:43

Ron from Vancouver, Canada
---------------
I have a camera and some lenses and I take pictures with them.

LOG IN TO REPLY

466,400 views & 0 likes for this thread
Canon EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF    •   JUMP TO FORUM    •   FORUM RULES    •   Index    •   New Posts    •   RTAT    •   "Best Of"    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.1version 1.1
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00104 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is jr59z
695 guests, 765 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014