Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography
Thread started 07 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 15:28
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

website design question

 
narlus
Cream of the Crop
narlus's Avatar
7,623 posts
Joined Apr 2006
North Andover, MA
Dec 07, 2006 15:28 |  #1

what screen resolution do people generally think is the best suited for potential site visitors? 800x600 seems way too small and archaic, but it used to be standard. by now i've got to figure that most people have at least stepped up to 1024 if not larger screens.

is that true?

just curious what resolutions people have designed their websites to.


www.tinnitus-photography.comexternal link
Facebook linkexternal link

gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Gary_Evans
Senior Member
Gary_Evans's Avatar
859 posts
Joined May 2006
Norfolk, England
Dec 07, 2006 15:37 |  #2

All mine are done for 1024 x 768


Gary
www.myeventphoto.co.ukexternal link
www.garyevansphotograp​hy.co.ukexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dtrayers
Goldmember
dtrayers's Avatar
1,062 posts
Joined Mar 2003
Denmark Township, MN, USA
Dec 07, 2006 15:37 |  #3

I tracking statistics on my websites. Here are the system resolutions for the past 1100 hits (about 60 different visitors). I'm trying to design for 1024x768, but I'm seeing more and more 1280x1024 (typically 17" and 19" LCDs). I'll probably start using that as a target next year.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

-Dave

http://www.trayersphot​ography.comexternal link

Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
picturecrazy's Avatar
8,552 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Alberta, CANADA
Dec 07, 2006 16:00 |  #4

I haven't been tracking stats on my website, I've just been using resources online with surfer stats. In general, I've found that 800x600 is still about 25% of total visitors. My site is written for 800x600 and I probably won't change that for another 1-2 years.

People can cope with a smaller window on a larger screen, but a large window on a small screen irritates the hell out of visitors.


-Lloyd
The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photographyexternal link
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographersexternal link
Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Headshot Photographersexternal link
Facebookexternal link | Twitterexternal link |Instagramexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
amonline's Avatar
3,528 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Dec 07, 2006 19:07 |  #5

While 1024 is the latest standard, most pro's still develop for 800 wide max. The smart choice is designing an expandable layout that will look pleasing in both situations. I develop sites based on the 800 max at this time. I wouldn't want to lose those 62 potential customers because they don't like to scroll. ;)




LOG IN TO REPLY
newbie_photog
Senior Member
362 posts
Joined Apr 2006
Oregon
Dec 07, 2006 21:11 |  #6

can anyone recomend a good, simple program to watch web stats for your site?


20d, 10d
Tamron 28-75 F2.8, Canon 50mm F1.8 II
550EX 540EZ, 2 AB 400

LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
Goldmember
R Hardman's Avatar
1,514 posts
Joined Aug 2005
29 Palms, Ca.
Dec 08, 2006 01:00 |  #7

newbie_photog wrote in post #2369274external link
can anyone recomend a good, simple program to watch web stats for your site?

Most domain hosts already have it as part of the package.


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desertexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dpurslow
Senior Member
dpurslow's Avatar
783 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Haverfordwest - West Wales UK
Dec 08, 2006 06:06 |  #8

I have made my epsphoto.co.uk website at 800x600 but if your using 1024 it will just have nice red borders !

I also now work for 1024 as standard, I think thats where the world is moving.


Regards,
David Purslow
07799 666808
/EMAIL]Birmingham Wedding Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Faolan
Goldmember
Faolan's Avatar
1,193 posts
Joined Jun 2006
Scotland
Dec 08, 2006 06:28 |  #9

Remember it's 750-780 wide if you include browser furniture and any borders you design ;)

Most of the sites I design are in the 800x600 bracket, designing a fluid site is preferable but some site designs can't be implemented that way.


Some call me the Heilan' Laddie, but others call me Rob.
Flickrexternal link - Lighting set ups using Canon Flash/Elinchrom plus some general work.
Celtic Shadows Designexternal link - Photography and WordPress Development.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Goldmember
Bobster's Avatar
4,990 posts
Joined May 2006
Dorset, England
Dec 09, 2006 18:37 |  #10

1024x768 is the market standard atm - all sites i design are 955px wide max - some sites are taller than others - but i try and set a site to a fixed size of 955x600

with most new systems now coming with 17-19" TFT's the standard is creaping to 1280x1024 so in a year or so i'll be changing my size to fit within that..


Robert Whetton (external link) Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
DIY Monitor Hood (external link) | Gear | Tweet (external link) | Google+ (external link) | FoCal 2 (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
tofuboy
Senior Member
652 posts
Joined Aug 2004
Maple Valley, WA
Dec 09, 2006 19:55 as a reply to Bobster's post |  #11

I design my sites for 800px wide. I'm assuming others are like me and don't browse with their browser maximized. Just because my screen is 1680px wide, doesn't mean I want my browser taking all 1680px up ;)


-Matt Seattle Photography - Nature|Portrait|Eventexternal link
'The negative is comparable to the composer’s score and the print to its performance.' - Ansel Adams

LOG IN TO REPLY
naqs
Goldmember
naqs's Avatar
1,814 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Auckland, New Zealand
Dec 09, 2006 20:08 |  #12

My brothers a webdesigner and he never goes bigger than 800px max but usually keeps in the 750px mark


Nathan[I][SIZE=1] [CENTER]
[SIZE=1]www.nathanwalker.co.nzexternal link | Twitterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
amonline's Avatar
3,528 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Dec 09, 2006 21:50 |  #13

Yea, 780px is max to allow the scroll bar on a maximized 800 screen. ;)

I usually max my tables at 760px.




LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
coreypolis's Avatar
6,793 posts
Joined Mar 2005
Mercer Island, WA
Dec 09, 2006 21:58 |  #14
banned

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com ...1/viperx27/MISC/cha​rt.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Photographic Resourcesexternal link || International Photo Journalistexternal link

Blogexternal link

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
BradT0517
I almost caught fire
BradT0517's Avatar
3,010 posts
Joined Aug 2006
Dec 09, 2006 22:25 |  #15

im not sure what have I think it is 1024x768 but POTN fits perfectly


My Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

1,672 views & 0 likes for this thread
website design question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00119 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
Latest registered member is FFFCFF
945 guests, 374 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016