LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


website design question

FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography
Thread started 07 Dec 2006 (Thursday) 15:28   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
narlus
Cream of the Crop
narlus's Avatar
Joined Apr 2006
7,570 posts
North Andover, MA
[MORE/SHARE]

what screen resolution do people generally think is the best suited for potential site visitors? 800x600 seems way too small and archaic, but it used to be standard. by now i've got to figure that most people have at least stepped up to 1024 if not larger screens.

is that true?

just curious what resolutions people have designed their websites to.

Post #1, Dec 07, 2006 15:28:55


www.tinnitus-photography.comexternal link
Facebook linkexternal link

gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Gary_Evans
Senior Member
Gary_Evans's Avatar
Joined May 2006
856 posts
Norfolk, England
[MORE/SHARE]

All mine are done for 1024 x 768

Post #2, Dec 07, 2006 15:37:32


Gary
www.myeventphoto.co.ukexternal link
www.garyevansphotograp​hy.co.ukexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dtrayers
Goldmember
dtrayers's Avatar
Joined Mar 2003
1,062 posts
Denmark Township, MN, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I tracking statistics on my websites. Here are the system resolutions for the past 1100 hits (about 60 different visitors). I'm trying to design for 1024x768, but I'm seeing more and more 1280x1024 (typically 17" and 19" LCDs). I'll probably start using that as a target next year.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #3, Dec 07, 2006 15:37:40


-Dave

http://www.trayersphot​ography.comexternal link

Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
picturecrazy
soft-hearted weenie-boy
picturecrazy's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
8,504 posts
Alberta, CANADA
[MORE/SHARE]

I haven't been tracking stats on my website, I've just been using resources online with surfer stats. In general, I've found that 800x600 is still about 25% of total visitors. My site is written for 800x600 and I probably won't change that for another 1-2 years.

People can cope with a smaller window on a larger screen, but a large window on a small screen irritates the hell out of visitors.

Post #4, Dec 07, 2006 16:00:20


-Lloyd
BOUDOIR WEBSITE: The BOUDOIR - Edmonton Intimate Boudoir Photographyexternal link
Lifestyle Website: Night and Day Photography - Edmonton Studio Family Baby Child Maternity Wedding Photographersexternal link
Facebookexternal link | Twitterexternal link | Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
amonline's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
3,528 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

While 1024 is the latest standard, most pro's still develop for 800 wide max. The smart choice is designing an expandable layout that will look pleasing in both situations. I develop sites based on the 800 max at this time. I wouldn't want to lose those 62 potential customers because they don't like to scroll. ;)

Post #5, Dec 07, 2006 19:07:08




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
newbie_photog
Senior Member
Joined Apr 2006
362 posts
Oregon
[MORE/SHARE]

can anyone recomend a good, simple program to watch web stats for your site?

Post #6, Dec 07, 2006 21:11:15


20d, 10d
Tamron 28-75 F2.8, Canon 50mm F1.8 II
550EX 540EZ, 2 AB 400

LOG IN TO REPLY
R ­ Hardman
Goldmember
R Hardman's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
1,514 posts
29 Palms, Ca.
[MORE/SHARE]

newbie_photog wrote in post #2369274external link
can anyone recomend a good, simple program to watch web stats for your site?

Most domain hosts already have it as part of the package.

Post #7, Dec 08, 2006 01:00:48


"Whatever you can do to avoid Photoshop is worth it"
EOS 7D, EOS 350D, EF 17-40mm f/4L USM, EF 70-200mm f/4L USM, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 USM (Kit)
Rick's Digital Desertexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
dpurslow
Senior Member
dpurslow's Avatar
Joined Jun 2005
783 posts
Haverfordwest - West Wales UK
[MORE/SHARE]

I have made my epsphoto.co.uk website at 800x600 but if your using 1024 it will just have nice red borders !

I also now work for 1024 as standard, I think thats where the world is moving.

Post #8, Dec 08, 2006 06:06:13


Regards,
David Purslow
07799 666808
/EMAIL]Birmingham Wedding Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Faolan
Goldmember
Faolan's Avatar
Joined Jun 2006
1,177 posts
Scotland
[MORE/SHARE]

Remember it's 750-780 wide if you include browser furniture and any borders you design ;)

Most of the sites I design are in the 800x600 bracket, designing a fluid site is preferable but some site designs can't be implemented that way.

Post #9, Dec 08, 2006 06:28:24


Some call me the Heilan' Laddie, but others call me Rob.
Flickrexternal link - Lighting set ups using Canon Flash/Elinchrom plus some general work.
Celtic Shadows Designexternal link - Photography and WordPress Development.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bobster
Goldmember
Bobster's Avatar
Joined May 2006
4,847 posts
Dorset, England
[MORE/SHARE]

1024x768 is the market standard atm - all sites i design are 955px wide max - some sites are taller than others - but i try and set a site to a fixed size of 955x600

with most new systems now coming with 17-19" TFT's the standard is creaping to 1280x1024 so in a year or so i'll be changing my size to fit within that..

Post #10, Dec 09, 2006 18:37:56


Robert Whettonexternal link Dorset Portrait & Events Photographer | Photoshop Guru
DIY Monitor Hoodexternal link | Gear | Tweetexternal link | Google+external link | Get your focus spot onexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
tofuboy
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2004
652 posts
Maple Valley, WA
[MORE/SHARE]

I design my sites for 800px wide. I'm assuming others are like me and don't browse with their browser maximized. Just because my screen is 1680px wide, doesn't mean I want my browser taking all 1680px up ;)

Post #11, Dec 09, 2006 19:55:10 as a reply to Bobster's post 1 hour earlier.


-Matt Seattle Photography - Nature|Portrait|Eventexternal link
'The negative is comparable to the composer’s score and the print to its performance.' - Ansel Adams

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
naqs
Goldmember
naqs's Avatar
Joined Nov 2006
1,814 posts
Auckland, New Zealand
[MORE/SHARE]

My brothers a webdesigner and he never goes bigger than 800px max but usually keeps in the 750px mark

Post #12, Dec 09, 2006 20:08:28


Nathan[I][SIZE=1] [CENTER]
[SIZE=1]www.nathanwalker.co.nzexternal link | Twitterexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
amonline
Goldmember
amonline's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
3,528 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Yea, 780px is max to allow the scroll bar on a maximized 800 screen. ;)

I usually max my tables at 760px.

Post #13, Dec 09, 2006 21:50:46




LOG IN TO REPLY
coreypolis
Cream of the Crop
coreypolis's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
6,793 posts
Mercer Island, WA
[MORE/SHARE]
banned

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://img.photobucket​.com ...1/viperx27/MISC/cha​rt.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'image/gif' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #14, Dec 09, 2006 21:58:04


Photographic Resourcesexternal link || International Photo Journalistexternal link

Blogexternal link

Seattle Wedding Photographer - Corey Polis Photographerexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
BradT0517
I almost caught fire
BradT0517's Avatar
Joined Aug 2006
3,010 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

im not sure what have I think it is 1024x768 but POTN fits perfectly

Post #15, Dec 09, 2006 22:25:12


My Websiteexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,348 views & 0 likes for this thread
website design question
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos The Business of Photography



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00093 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
735 guests, 497 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is johntorcasio

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.