![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
I just recently picked up a used EOS 20D, and for lenses I'm using the two that my grandfather used to use on an EOS film Rebel, a Canon 50mm f/1.8 and a Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6. I generally don't use the Sigma, because it's old, sort of sticky, operates weird (you extend or contract the lens by actually pulling the barrel forwards or backwards) and the iris is broken (you get an error message trying to shoot with the aperture anything other than wide open). Today, though, some herons were hanging out on my roof, and I decided to go ahead and pull it out of my closet and take some shots, and this is one that I got.
The thing I don't get is the bokeh. It seems almost...is swirly the right word? I got the same sort of thing happening on another image from a different angle, so I don't think it's just the tree behind it, and it can't be camera shake, because camera shake that extreme would have destroyed the subject. Is it something about the lens? I'm completely and utterly stumped by the effect, but it's something I'd very much like to be able to recreate later on, if I knew how... |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
|
It's the 5 blade vice 8 blade aperture. This produces what some consider poor bokeh.
Nice shot though !
__________________
Canon 40D, 5D MK II Speedlites 430EX & 580EX II Canon 70-200 f/2.8L (Non IS), Canon Extender EF 1.4 X II, Canon 400 f/5.6 L, Canon 100 f/2.8 Macro, Canon 24-70 f/2.8L |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
|
Does that have any effect when the aperture is fully open? (It's the only way I can shoot). And I don't suppose there are any modern lenses that use the five blade? They all seem to be bragging about how many they can cram in there...
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
|
Don't know about the bokeh, but I do know that the nifty fifty is still a 5 blade
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
|
Check out some of the reviews on the below site. I hop it sheds some light. I personally like the creamy smooth bokeh. http://www.the-digital-picture.com/
Bokeh: ![]()
__________________
Canon 40D, 5D MK II Speedlites 430EX & 580EX II Canon 70-200 f/2.8L (Non IS), Canon Extender EF 1.4 X II, Canon 400 f/5.6 L, Canon 100 f/2.8 Macro, Canon 24-70 f/2.8L Last edited by RandyMays : 23rd of December 2006 (Sat) at 22:56. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
It looks like the tree leaves were moving, which is why the bokeh (first pic) on the leaves is odd. Notice the bokeh of the trees in the far background (still first pic), it looks normal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: In a semi-civilized small town in southeastern Arizona.
Posts: 12,881
|
Was the tree wet (early morning dew or a wet day)? Water droplet relections/refractions often produce weird bokeh, especially if the tree was moving.
Was the tree backlit and moving? Sunlight through moving branches can also produce weird bokeh. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
|
The bird was about the break the sound barrier.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
|
LMAO! It sorta does look like that too hahahah.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sigma 17-70mm - comments on this bokeh | frame | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 6 | 17th of March 2007 (Sat) 12:48 |
| sigma 17-70 bokeh | gsewell | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 6 | 12th of November 2006 (Sun) 04:14 |
| Sigma 18-50EX bokeh samples | Digitalwave | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 3 | 10th of August 2006 (Thu) 09:02 |
| weird colour bands - 30D + Sigma 30/1.4 | gama | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 10 | 8th of June 2006 (Thu) 01:29 |
| Sigma 70-200+1.4xTC = crazy bokeh and softeness at length | Nolz | Canon EF and EF-S Lenses | 28 | 26th of July 2005 (Tue) 15:29 |