Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 12 Jan 2007 (Friday) 19:52
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Whats a better birding lens... 300mm, 400mm, 100-400?

 
StealthLude
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 12, 2007 19:52 |  #1

For someone who wants to get into birding on a budget...

What would you recommend...

I already have a 300mm f/4 L IS lens on its way... but birding wasnt the reason I bought the lens, but I was curious to know if the AF was fast enought to use for birds in flight?

I was also looking at the 100-400 and the 400mm f/5.6 L lens.

I dont want to focus too much on focal length, because I know 300 can be a little short for birding use, but I wanted to know if the lenses would be able to perform.

Thanks!


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
canonshooter4life
Senior Member
974 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
     
Jan 12, 2007 21:57 |  #2

I got the 400L because i cant afford the 1-4... I know it doesnt seem a lot more expensive but it is nearly 600 less when tax is all totaled and that is a lot when your saving for university...

It is a big improvement over my 300 in terms of how large the image is... the image from a 300 to 400 lense 77% larger at 400mm...It depends on what types of birds you are shooting... when i used my 75-300 i almost always used it as a prime and kept it at 300 all the time and most of the time it still wasnt enough reach...and i can count on one hand the number of times i have used it for birds at less than 300mm...

However even if i could afford the 1-4 I would go for the prime because i usually photograph shorebirds and waterfowl which most of the time are hard to get close too... the only downside i can see IMHO is that it needs good light because of the f5.6 aperature...

The 300 f4 also looks great from the shots i have seen petkal post on the bird forum... but really you have to make the decision on which one you think would best suit your needs...we can only give you our personal opinions...:) have fun choosing ... I hope i didnt just blab on i dont do well in writing in school :p

Brandon


Brandon

Gear: Canon 60D, Canon 400mm f5.6L, Nifty Fifty, Canon 580EX, Kenko tube set, Kenko Pro 1.4X TC (coming next), Bushhawk, Manfrotto 055 ProB, and Manfrotto 322 grip head.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 12, 2007 22:04 |  #3

Thanks for your responce

I know the Focal length difference beteween 300 and 400... and I plan on buying a 1.4x TC for my 300mm f/4 so I can have a 420mm f5.6 IS lens...

I am also considering buying a Sigma 50-500 or a Canon 400mm 5.6 lens (+ 1.4x TC)

I dont think reach is the problem...

I am more or less concerned with AF speed. I know when using TCs with all the above lenses we cut the AF speed by a lot. But I was to know if any of the above lenses with or w/o TC will be fast enought, AF wise, for birding.

I figure if I can get away with my 300, or 300 +1.4x TC, it will help me get into a Mark II 1Dn camera. I figure upgrading the body will also help since it has more AF points and ive been told the AI Servo is faster and more accurate with a 1 series camera.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,886 posts
Likes: 143
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jan 12, 2007 22:07 |  #4

How about the Bigma?


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
3,923 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 659
Joined May 2004
Location: Lakeland, FL
     
Jan 12, 2007 22:07 |  #5

Definitely the 400.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 12, 2007 22:21 |  #6

RikWriter wrote in post #2532372 (external link)
Definitely the 400.

Why? AF speed or reach, or both?

I plan on just using my 300mm f/4 IS + 1.4x TC

unless I can find a damn good excuse to own the 400mm f5.6 lens too :lol:

MarkII 1Dn might have to wait then.


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
3,923 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 659
Joined May 2004
Location: Lakeland, FL
     
Jan 12, 2007 22:29 |  #7

StealthLude wrote in post #2532445 (external link)
Why? AF speed or reach, or both?
.

Both. Plus IQ is amazing and also you can use a Tamron 1.4X TC or use the tape trick on a Canon TC and still get acceptable IQ.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sirsloop
BigFoot
943 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Location: South River, NJ
     
Jan 13, 2007 00:21 |  #8

if you go with the 400/5.6... you'll lose AF with a 1.4x on your 20D. At that price range, I'd peep the Bigma!! Even 400 is on the short end of a birding lens... 500+ is where its at :)


no gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
3,923 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 659
Joined May 2004
Location: Lakeland, FL
     
Jan 13, 2007 06:50 |  #9

sirsloop wrote in post #2532866 (external link)
if you go with the 400/5.6... you'll lose AF with a 1.4x on your 20D.

Not with the cheap Tamron TC. Also, you can use the tape trick with a Canon TC and retain autofocus as well.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
canonshooter4life
Senior Member
974 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
     
Jan 13, 2007 08:36 |  #10

I also heard the bigma has fairly slow focusing and the 400L is the flight delight... It is one of arthur morris's favourite lenses for inflight birds!


Brandon


Brandon

Gear: Canon 60D, Canon 400mm f5.6L, Nifty Fifty, Canon 580EX, Kenko tube set, Kenko Pro 1.4X TC (coming next), Bushhawk, Manfrotto 055 ProB, and Manfrotto 322 grip head.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
morehtml
Goldmember
Avatar
2,987 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Aug 2005
Location: Murfreesboro, TN
     
Jan 13, 2007 08:56 |  #11

The 400 5.6L is the best entry level bird lens around is is the #1 bird in flight lens. You almost always need reach for most birds. 400mm is minimum reach!


---------------
"Allen's Visions of Nature Gallery" (external link)
www.allensvisions.com (external link)

more glass than I need

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
lon10c
Senior Member
Avatar
374 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Location: St. John, USVI
     
Jan 13, 2007 12:42 |  #12

My friends in Florida say the 400/5.6 is the best bird in flight lens there is. I've seen their work and I believe them. Really good stuff with a 20D and a 400/5.6.

If you do a lot of birds then most of your work will be at 400mm anyway.

I prefer the 500/4.0 but that's just me.


-
-
Cameras: Canon 1Ds/1D MII.

Lenses: Canon "L".

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JNunn
Senior Member
538 posts
Joined May 2006
     
Jan 13, 2007 14:25 |  #13

I chose the 100-400L, mostly for the utility. For birding I use it at 400 almost all of the time, but there are times when I'll find something a bit closer to focus on and I'm glad it focuses closer than the 400 does. The IS also helps out a lot.

Although a bit heavy, it is also a great walkaround for the zoo, candids, etc. The 400 wouldn't work for walking around.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
3,923 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 659
Joined May 2004
Location: Lakeland, FL
     
Jan 13, 2007 14:28 |  #14

JNunn wrote in post #2534999 (external link)
I chose the 100-400L, mostly for the utility. For birding I use it at 400 almost all of the time, but there are times when I'll find something a bit closer to focus on and I'm glad it focuses closer than the 400 does. The IS also helps out a lot.

Although a bit heavy, it is also a great walkaround for the zoo, candids, etc. The 400 wouldn't work for walking around.


It worked for me for walking around. It's not really appreciably heavier than the 100-400 and is very hand-holdable in good light.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
3,680 posts
Joined Dec 2005
     
Jan 13, 2007 14:32 |  #15

How does the AF speed compare from a 300mm f/4 IS to the 400mm f/5.6? (just wondering)

Both lenses are bare bone, (no TC)


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

11,483 views & 0 likes for this thread
Whats a better birding lens... 300mm, 400mm, 100-400?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is simon milton
656 guests, 355 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.