Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
Thread started 13 Jan 2007 (Saturday) 04:00
Search threadPrev/next
POLL: "Which lens?"
SIGMA 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro
29
42.6%
SIGMA 17-70MM f2.8-4.5 DC Macro
39
57.4%

68 voters, 68 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

SIGMA 24-70 VS. SIGMA 17-70

 
Matt57
Member
199 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
     
Jan 13, 2007 04:00 |  #1

SIGMA 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG VS. SIGMA 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC

Finally, I've narrowed it down!! They both cost roughly $400. My main use is an all-purpose lens until I buy a super wide and a big tele.

All I currently own is in my sig!

EDIT: OH, PLEASE STATE WHY


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
EpHeSuS
Senior Member
280 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 13, 2007 04:23 |  #2

Whilst I do own the 24-70, I'd go for the 17-70 if I had to do it again. More range and from what I've heard, just as sharp. All you're missing out on is the EX build quality.


EOS 20D | 1d Mk II | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Canon 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 135 f/2L | Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX HSM | Sigma 1.4x EX TC | Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 DC OS | 580EX II
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matt57
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
199 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
     
Jan 13, 2007 04:43 |  #3

EpHeSuS wrote in post #2533278 (external link)
Whilst I do own the 24-70, I'd go for the 17-70 if I had to do it again. More range and from what I've heard, just as sharp. All you're missing out on is the EX build quality.

But thats alot to miss out on. I like build quality! Isnt it also something to do w/optical quality too??


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
EpHeSuS
Senior Member
280 posts
Joined Jul 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
     
Jan 13, 2007 05:58 |  #4

Matt57 wrote in post #2533299 (external link)
But thats alot to miss out on. I like build quality! Isnt it also something to do w/optical quality too??

To be honest, the pictures I've seen from the 17-70 don't look any worse than the 24-70. From what I've heard though, the build quality on the 17-70 is very good for a non-EX grade lens. You should ask someone who owns one though for a more detailed opinion :)


EOS 20D | 1d Mk II | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Canon 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 135 f/2L | Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX HSM | Sigma 1.4x EX TC | Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 DC OS | 580EX II
My Gallery (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
whiteflyer
Goldmember
Avatar
1,586 posts
Gallery: 105 photos
Likes: 240
Joined Jun 2006
Location: Lancashire, England
     
Jan 13, 2007 06:13 as a reply to  @ EpHeSuS's post |  #5

I'm interested on how this goes, as I too am look at new lenses.

You'd be losing some speed at 70 mm f2.8 / f4.5

There is also the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di in this price group


Whiteflyer Photography (external link) | Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
RikWriter
Goldmember
Avatar
3,923 posts
Gallery: 80 photos
Likes: 659
Joined May 2004
Location: Lakeland, FL
     
Jan 13, 2007 06:51 |  #6

I've never tried the 17-70 but I really like my 24-70.


My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
Avatar
20,886 posts
Likes: 19
Joined Mar 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
     
Jan 13, 2007 06:58 |  #7

I had the 24-70mm EX and it's a very good lens but I prefer the 17-70mm because the range is better for walkaround on a crop body and the IQ just as decent and possibly a tad better (tho' I would need to test both together to be certain - any difference is likely to be irrelevant to most). Build isn't an issue as both are fit for purpose too.


http://photography-on-the.net …/showthread.php​?t=1203740

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Layston
Senior Member
Avatar
726 posts
Joined Apr 2005
Location: Boston
     
Jan 13, 2007 07:16 |  #8

Simple decision for me.

17-70 CONS: not constant 2.8, only for crop bodies
24-70 PROS: EX build, constant 2.8, full frame compatible, better optics IMHO

However
17-70 PROS: wider, cheaper, closer focusing (20cm)
24-70 CONS: 82mm filter diameter, further focusing (40cm)


GEAR LIST

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
grimreaper
Senior Member
Avatar
555 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Location: Midlands, England
     
Jan 13, 2007 09:48 |  #9

im interested in this as well as im ordering my stuf today and only thing i carnt decide on is between these to lenses baring in mind im getting the sigma 10-20 as well so i think i might be better of going for the 24-70


:D Any Photo is better than none:D
All the best, James.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,886 posts
Likes: 143
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jan 13, 2007 09:56 |  #10

I vote for the 17-70. Plus, it's only $350 at B&H (external link). EX is mostly about build-quality, not optics.


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
6,002 posts
Likes: 3
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Olympia, Washington
     
Jan 13, 2007 10:14 |  #11

I had the 17-70 and traded it in for the 24-70. That being said though if I could go back and do it again I'd keep the 17-70. It's just a great focal length and sharp. The quasi-macro is cool too! The build quality is still great. I went for my 24-70 because of constant 2.8 aperture and supposed better optics. But really the 17-70 is just as sharp and 2.8 to 4 doesn't matter a whole heck of a lot with this lens.


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolio (external link)
Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matt57
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
199 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
     
Jan 14, 2007 01:20 |  #12

Good info


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Matt57
THREAD ­ STARTER
Member
199 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Location: Kentucky, USA
     
Jan 14, 2007 03:24 |  #13

Very close poll this is turning out to be.


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
farrukh
Goldmember
Avatar
1,969 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Location: Lahore, Pakistan
     
Jan 14, 2007 09:26 |  #14

My vote is for 24-70 because of following reason.

1- Its a full frame lens so its a safe future.
2- Constant aperture. not just for low light but also for more DOF control
3- EX build and optics.

If you don't mind its weight and filter size (82mm) then its best choice. Later you can add a wide-angle lens to your gear.


5D Mark II + 40D | Lenses: Sigma 150-500mm BigmOS / Canon 24-105mm F4L IS / Canon 70-200 F4L IS / Canon 85mm 1.8 / Sigma Macro 70mm f/2.8 EX / Sigma 10-20mm EX / Canon 50mm f/1.8 II / Sigma 1.4x APO TC / Kenko 2x PRO300 DG. Lighting: Canon 580EX II + Metz 58 AF-1 + Sunpak 383...
Flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
MinisterStanley
Senior Member
Avatar
293 posts
Joined Dec 2004
     
Jan 14, 2007 10:02 |  #15

My vote is for the 24-70mm. I found out while on vacation, that your camera a lens can get bumped around, and I realized how comforting it was that my lens has good build quality and can take a bump. The constant 2.8 aperture is also a big plus


-Prodigal Son

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

5,758 views & 0 likes for this thread
SIGMA 24-70 VS. SIGMA 17-70
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is shandesh19
748 guests, 276 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.