LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


SIGMA 24-70 VS. SIGMA 17-70

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 13 Jan 2007 (Saturday) 04:00   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
Poll"Which lens?"

SIGMA 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro
29
42.6%
SIGMA 17-70MM f2.8-4.5 DC Macro
39
57.4%

68 voters, 68 votes given (1 choice only choices can be voted per member)). VOTING IS FOR MEMBERS ONLY.
BROWSE ALL POLLS
 
Matt57
Senior Member
Matt57's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
196 posts
Kentucky, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

SIGMA 24-70mm F2.8 EX DG VS. SIGMA 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC

Finally, I've narrowed it down!! They both cost roughly $400. My main use is an all-purpose lens until I buy a super wide and a big tele.

All I currently own is in my sig!

EDIT: OH, PLEASE STATE WHY

Post #1, Jan 13, 2007 04:00:35


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
EpHeSuS
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2003
280 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Whilst I do own the 24-70, I'd go for the 17-70 if I had to do it again. More range and from what I've heard, just as sharp. All you're missing out on is the EX build quality.

Post #2, Jan 13, 2007 04:23:36


EOS 20D | 1d Mk II | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Canon 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 135 f/2L | Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX HSM | Sigma 1.4x EX TC | Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 DC OS | 580EX II
My Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Matt57
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Matt57's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
196 posts
Kentucky, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

EpHeSuS wrote in post #2533278external link
Whilst I do own the 24-70, I'd go for the 17-70 if I had to do it again. More range and from what I've heard, just as sharp. All you're missing out on is the EX build quality.

But thats alot to miss out on. I like build quality! Isnt it also something to do w/optical quality too??

Post #3, Jan 13, 2007 04:43:37


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

LOG IN TO REPLY
EpHeSuS
Senior Member
Joined Jul 2003
280 posts
Melbourne, Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Matt57 wrote in post #2533299external link
But thats alot to miss out on. I like build quality! Isnt it also something to do w/optical quality too??

To be honest, the pictures I've seen from the 17-70 don't look any worse than the 24-70. From what I've heard though, the build quality on the 17-70 is very good for a non-EX grade lens. You should ask someone who owns one though for a more detailed opinion :)

Post #4, Jan 13, 2007 05:58:55


EOS 20D | 1d Mk II | 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6 EX DC HSM | Canon 24-105 f/4L IS | Canon 135 f/2L | Sigma 100-300 f/4 EX HSM | Sigma 1.4x EX TC | Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 DC OS | 580EX II
My Galleryexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
whiteflyer
Goldmember
whiteflyer's Avatar
Joined Jun 2006
1,355 posts
Lancashire, England
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm interested on how this goes, as I too am look at new lenses.

You'd be losing some speed at 70 mm f2.8 / f4.5

There is also the Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di in this price group

Post #5, Jan 13, 2007 06:13:22 as a reply to EpHeSuS's post 14 minutes earlier.


Whiteflyer Photographyexternal link | Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
RikWriter
Goldmember
RikWriter's Avatar
Joined May 2004
3,545 posts
Lakeland, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

I've never tried the 17-70 but I really like my 24-70.

Post #6, Jan 13, 2007 06:51:02


My gear: 7D, 70D, Tamron 28-75 f2.8, Canon 100-400L IS, 500mm f4L IS, 1.4X II TC.
My pics:
www.pbase.com/rikwrite​r

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

I had the 24-70mm EX and it's a very good lens but I prefer the 17-70mm because the range is better for walkaround on a crop body and the IQ just as decent and possibly a tad better (tho' I would need to test both together to be certain - any difference is likely to be irrelevant to most). Build isn't an issue as both are fit for purpose too.

Post #7, Jan 13, 2007 06:58:43


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
Layston
Senior Member
Layston's Avatar
Joined Apr 2005
726 posts
Boston
[MORE/SHARE]

Simple decision for me.

17-70 CONS: not constant 2.8, only for crop bodies
24-70 PROS: EX build, constant 2.8, full frame compatible, better optics IMHO

However
17-70 PROS: wider, cheaper, closer focusing (20cm)
24-70 CONS: 82mm filter diameter, further focusing (40cm)

Post #8, Jan 13, 2007 07:16:40


GEAR LIST

LOG IN TO REPLY
grimreaper
Senior Member
grimreaper's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
555 posts
Midlands, England
[MORE/SHARE]

im interested in this as well as im ordering my stuf today and only thing i carnt decide on is between these to lenses baring in mind im getting the sigma 10-20 as well so i think i might be better of going for the 24-70

Post #9, Jan 13, 2007 09:48:32


:D Any Photo is better than none:D
All the best, James.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
9,752 posts
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I vote for the 17-70. Plus, it's only $350 at B&Hexternal link. EX is mostly about build-quality, not optics.

Post #10, Jan 13, 2007 09:56:47


Gear list
"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
Zeiss 35/2 for sale.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Mr. Clean's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
5,996 posts
Olympia, Washington
[MORE/SHARE]

I had the 17-70 and traded it in for the 24-70. That being said though if I could go back and do it again I'd keep the 17-70. It's just a great focal length and sharp. The quasi-macro is cool too! The build quality is still great. I went for my 24-70 because of constant 2.8 aperture and supposed better optics. But really the 17-70 is just as sharp and 2.8 to 4 doesn't matter a whole heck of a lot with this lens.

Post #11, Jan 13, 2007 10:14:12


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolioexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Matt57
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Matt57's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
196 posts
Kentucky, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Good info

Post #12, Jan 14, 2007 01:20:40


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

LOG IN TO REPLY
Matt57
THREAD ­ STARTER
Senior Member
Matt57's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
196 posts
Kentucky, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

Very close poll this is turning out to be.

Post #13, Jan 14, 2007 03:24:30


Future 40D owner!! Canon Digital Rebel XTI, 18-55 lens, Canon 50mm 1.8II, Canon 10-22mm
Real Estate & Development Property Photography

LOG IN TO REPLY
farrukh
Goldmember
farrukh's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
1,969 posts
Lahore, Pakistan
[MORE/SHARE]

My vote is for 24-70 because of following reason.

1- Its a full frame lens so its a safe future.
2- Constant aperture. not just for low light but also for more DOF control
3- EX build and optics.

If you don't mind its weight and filter size (82mm) then its best choice. Later you can add a wide-angle lens to your gear.

Post #14, Jan 14, 2007 09:26:57


5D Mark II + 40D | Lenses: Sigma 150-500mm BigmOS / Canon 24-105mm F4L IS / Canon 70-200 F4L IS / Canon 85mm 1.8 / Sigma Macro 70mm f/2.8 EX / Sigma 10-20mm EX / Canon 50mm f/1.8 II / Sigma 1.4x APO TC / Kenko 2x PRO300 DG. Lighting: Canon 580EX II + Metz 58 AF-1 + Sunpak 383...
Flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
MinisterStanley
Senior Member
MinisterStanley's Avatar
Joined Dec 2004
293 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

My vote is for the 24-70mm. I found out while on vacation, that your camera a lens can get bumped around, and I realized how comforting it was that my lens has good build quality and can take a bump. The constant 2.8 aperture is also a big plus

Post #15, Jan 14, 2007 10:02:38


-Prodigal Son

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
3,473 views & 0 likes for this thread
SIGMA 24-70 VS. SIGMA 17-70
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00117 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1052 guests, 757 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is modular747

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.