LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Sigma APO 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG MACRO

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 22 Jan 2007 (Monday) 11:47   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
blam
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2006
1,895 posts
Edmonton, AB, CAN
[MORE/SHARE]

hello,

I am looking for a budget zoom I can possibly lug around for a year to see how useful the range is to me before jumping on a Canon 70-200 F4 IS or 2.8IS (depending how useful I find it & cash constraints!)

I read in a couple threads that this is a great budget telephoto,

for anyone that has this, could you please post some shots you took with this lens? both good and bad.

Thanks

Post #1, Jan 22, 2007 11:47:26


Canon 5D MKII
EF 16-35 F2.8L II | EF 70-200 F2.8L IS | EF 50mm F1.2L | EF 100mm F2.8 Macro
430EX II | 580EX II
http://www.onthelam.caexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
angryhampster
"Got a thick monopod?"
angryhampster's Avatar
Joined May 2006
3,850 posts
Iowa
[MORE/SHARE]

The Sigma 70-300 is quite a step down from Canon IS 70-200 zooms. I don't own any of these, but I can tell you that they're a world apart.

Post #2, Jan 22, 2007 11:50:46


Steve Lexa
http://photography-on-the.net ...p?t=597688&highligh​t=mintIowa City Wedding Photographyexternal link
Lights, Cameras, Lenses, Empty pockets.

LOG IN TO REPLY
Borderfox
Goldmember
Borderfox's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
1,367 posts
Dunshaughlin, Ireland
[MORE/SHARE]

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/Borderfox/IMG_3480.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/Borderfox/Zoo413.jpg

IMAGE: http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y213/Borderfox/IMG_3132.jpg

All shot with the Sigma 70-300 APO. Great lens and was very handy for what I wanted...

Post #3, Jan 22, 2007 12:01:04 as a reply to angryhampster's post 10 minutes earlier.


Click Here and Join the POTN flickr Group Today!external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
shaneotool
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2006
211 posts
arkansas
[MORE/SHARE]

I shot the following with the sigma 70-300mm APO DG MACRO:

http://picasaweb.googl​e.com ...hoto#s4994015130095​779858external link

I like it. I think it is the best of the budget zooms. To get better, you would need to get the 70-300mm IS or the 70-200L. They are more than double the price.

Post #4, Jan 22, 2007 12:13:58




LOG IN TO REPLY
odvdveer
Senior Member
odvdveer's Avatar
Joined Apr 2006
383 posts
Netherlands
[MORE/SHARE]

I like it, it is sharp and light and good for semi macro. Images are lot sharper at full size, but downsampled for the web.

Olga

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://odvdveer.nl ...IMAGES-NOT-ALLOWED-e5a9)-

IMG NOTICE: [NOT AN IMAGE URL, NOT RENDERED INLINE]
http://odvdveer.nl ...IMAGES-NOT-ALLOWED-e5a9)-

Post #5, Jan 22, 2007 12:30:08


40D,
Sigma 70-300 F4-5.6 DG macro/ Sigma 28-70 F2.8 ex dg/ Tamron di 17-35 F2.8-4 / Tamron sp 90 macro F2.8 / Canon 50 F1.4 / Sigma 70-200 F2.8 ex

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
superdiver
Cream of the Crop
superdiver's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
9,834 posts
Ketchikan Alaska
[MORE/SHARE]

The motion ones seem a little soft....whereas the still animals are much more sharp...

I have seen other GREAT results with this lens so it may be handshake or maybe a bad copy...

Post #6, Jan 22, 2007 12:39:54


40D, davidalbertsonphotography.com
Newbie still learning

LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2006
1,895 posts
Edmonton, AB, CAN
[MORE/SHARE]

angryhampster wrote in post #2581141external link
The Sigma 70-300 is quite a step down from Canon IS 70-200 zooms. I don't own any of these, but I can tell you that they're a world apart.

I am well aware the difference is leaps and bounds. but If I am not going to find the use out of the 70-300 I don't need to drop the additional 1000$-1800 on the canon white lenses.

thanks for the samples everyone

keep them coming!

Post #7, Jan 22, 2007 12:42:21


Canon 5D MKII
EF 16-35 F2.8L II | EF 70-200 F2.8L IS | EF 50mm F1.2L | EF 100mm F2.8 Macro
430EX II | 580EX II
http://www.onthelam.caexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
PhotoFranz
Goldmember
PhotoFranz's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
1,626 posts
Chicago, Illinois
[MORE/SHARE]

Iagree that the Sigma is a world apart from the Canon IS 70-200, but with a choice between $1700 and sub $300 for the Sigma APO 70-300, the "budget" part of the question sure comes into play. I am also looking at the Sigma lens, also a Sigma 17-70. LOL, I wish I could ignore price, but I am retired and also must buy budget.

Post #8, Jan 22, 2007 12:43:49 as a reply to angryhampster's post 53 minutes earlier.


http://www.flickr.com/​photos/photofranz/external link
Camera: Fujifilm HS 50 EXR 42X zoom, Sigma Electronic Flash EF 500 DG ST, Vegas Movie Studio 9.0, Noiseware Standard Edition, Photoshop Elements-11, Photomatix Essentials. I am here to learn from the experts.

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

That is good logic and I followed it myself. If you do upgrade then you will lose little on a resale. Unless you buy SH then you will lose more buying an L if you find you don't use it much. A good lens. I had one.

Post #9, Jan 22, 2007 12:44:54


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
Mr. ­ Clean
Cream of the Crop
Mr. Clean's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
5,996 posts
Olympia, Washington
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm too lazy to bring up the other sample pics threads but I'll tell ya, I wa always impressed by my 70-300 APO's performance. Works great for still life or bright sunny says. It needs to be stopped down about 1 1/3 stops and it's good. Just slow...

Post #10, Jan 22, 2007 12:50:05


Mike
some shots @ Zenfolioexternal link
Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2006
1,895 posts
Edmonton, AB, CAN
[MORE/SHARE]

at this range, it will be used outside pretty much all the time.

the cost of this lens is about $320CDN

finding it SH in Canada would be a tough find.

some of the pics posted above I cant see (blocked at work) I will check em out when I get home.

how is the sharpness of this lens? i have a 50 1.4, I know the sigma will come nowhere near it, but will I be fairly dissappointed in the sharpness of this lens?

how does it compare to the canon 75-300 (for those with experience or knowledge of the 2)

Post #11, Jan 22, 2007 13:29:56


Canon 5D MKII
EF 16-35 F2.8L II | EF 70-200 F2.8L IS | EF 50mm F1.2L | EF 100mm F2.8 Macro
430EX II | 580EX II
http://www.onthelam.caexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
kcp1377
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2006
358 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I was very nervous getting the Siggy 70-300mm bu like you wanted to try a tele without dropping $1k+ on a lens that I wouldn't use. I love it. I wish it had IS, but I love it. I was surprised at the sharpness of it much better than I had expected - even at 300mm. It was one of those things that I researched thoroughly and kept coming up as the best option of the sub$500 category. And I got mine used so it didn't cost much at all! Very nice choice and will suit me well until I can get my 70-200mm f2.8 IS (not for a long time as I just don't use teles that often and can't justify that cost)...

Oh - and the 50mm 1.4 is rarely off my camera. So that's the sharpness I'm used to. Maybe I just got a great copy? Everything I read rated it much higher than the Canon 75-300... (as long as I'm thinking of the right lens...) :)

Post #12, Jan 22, 2007 13:53:43 as a reply to blam's post 23 minutes earlier.


Kim ~ Shooting with full frame digital, medium format and 35mm film paired with some of the best glass available.

LOG IN TO REPLY
slug
Senior Member
Joined Dec 2006
150 posts
Edmonton
[MORE/SHARE]

blam wrote in post #2581623external link
at this range, it will be used outside pretty much all the time.

Hey Blam. Fellow Edmontonian here! I just went through deciding between this lens and the Canon 70-200 f4/L non IS. I picked up the Canon for $765CAD so the lens is a bit more than 2x the cost of the Sigma.

As you said, you will be using this range for outside use... if it is daylight then I think you would do well in getting yourself the f4/L non IS as you would be able to get more than fast enough shutterspeeds, even handheld.
I ultimately went with the f4/L because if I got the Sigma I would have always had it in the back of my mind that my shots could have been just *that* much sharper with the Canon. Plus you say that you would eventually get the F2.8/L IS or F4/L IS so why not save yourself the trouble of reselling the Sigma at a loss and get a lens that is comparable in IQ to the IS lenses when used in proper lighting conditions?

All imho of course. Good luck!

Post #13, Jan 22, 2007 14:07:55


Neil - gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
blam
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Joined Sep 2006
1,895 posts
Edmonton, AB, CAN
[MORE/SHARE]

slug: cash flow is another argument....I want something long at the moment, but don't know if I can ever justify the F4 IS.

also wanting to buy a wide angle lens for travelling...as well as a walkaround (24-70)

maybe more time will help me decide. or finding a used sig 70-300.

Post #14, Jan 22, 2007 16:08:01


Canon 5D MKII
EF 16-35 F2.8L II | EF 70-200 F2.8L IS | EF 50mm F1.2L | EF 100mm F2.8 Macro
430EX II | 580EX II
http://www.onthelam.caexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Picklett
Member
Picklett's Avatar
Joined Aug 2004
45 posts
Cardiff, Wales, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Got a slip through the door today to say mine is at the post office, and will be picking it up first thing tomorrow. Hopefully get some pics up soon. :)

Post #15, Jan 22, 2007 16:23:17 as a reply to blam's post 15 minutes earlier.



Canon 50D | 430 EX
EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS | EF 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 70-300 APO DG

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
346,062 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma APO 70-300mm F/4-5.6 DG MACRO
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00087 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
1039 guests, 828 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Lidas

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.