Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Sharing Knowhow' section > Talk About Photography > General Photography Talk
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10th of February 2007 (Sat)   #1
AussieCat
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 522
Default External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

i know this question might seem really naive...

i have yet to buy an external flash for my 400d.

i'll need it for night club / social events photography i'll be doing soon.

but, is it normal that when i use my built in flash on my 400d that often

there is like a buffer / waiting periois before i can take the next shot with the flash again?

is this normal to have a waiting period sometime of 1-6 seconds?

if so

does this mean i need to just get an external flash to eliminate thi issue?

of do u ofetn have to wait even with external flashes before the batter will reload again / recharge the falsh? if u know what i mean
AussieCat is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 10th of February 2007 (Sat)   #2
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 32,715
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

Flash needs to recycle. It's as simple as that. Some are faster than others, often depending how much of the total capacity has been used. In other words if a flash is rated to recycle in 6 seconds, if you only use half of it's power for a given shot, you can expect a 3 second recycle time.

Onboard flash isn't known for it's range or speed.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th of February 2007 (Sat)   #3
AussieCat
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 522
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

does this mean

if its a worry

i need to get a good external flash?
AussieCat is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 10th of February 2007 (Sat)   #4
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
 
cdifoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 32,715
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

The best way I can sum it up is if you need a flash, external is the best way to go. There are still "delays" with recycling but they won't be as bad as with the onboard.
__________________
Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it here. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!
cdifoto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th of February 2007 (Sat)   #5
AussieCat
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 522
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

sweet

makes sense



Quote:
Originally Posted by cdi-ink.com View Post
The best way I can sum it up is if you need a flash, external is the best way to go. There are still "delays" with recycling but they won't be as bad as with the onboard.
AussieCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th of February 2007 (Sat)   #6
Bodog
Senior Member
 
Bodog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Peculiar, MO
Posts: 1,306
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

The built in is great for fill-in in a pinch, but if you intend to shot in an environment where you know you will need flash, then you gotta have a good external, no way around it.
__________________
JimE
Color? It's all relative...
Bodog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th of February 2007 (Sun)   #7
Jon, The Elder
teaching fish to ride a bicycle
 
Jon, The Elder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Warren, Michigan
Posts: 2,487
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

Aside from making a 'hot spot' in your image, the built in is only reaching out about 12' or so. An external will extend that quite a bit and, if diffused, will give you much better control of the light pattern.
__________________
A 40D, a 30D, some nice glass and a great Shooting Partner.
"...As in music, so in life."
Jon, The Elder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th of February 2007 (Sun)   #8
chris clements
Senior Member
 
chris clements's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: this scepter'd isle (bottom right corner)
Posts: 1,644
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

The pop-up flash is just for fill or emergency. Range, even coverage and recycling are poor; you sholdn't be relying on it.
Go get a 430 now.
chris clements is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th of February 2007 (Sun)   #9
rowdyred94
Senior Member
 
rowdyred94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: St. Cloud, MN, USA
Posts: 1,917
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

I have a 430 and just switched from alkalines to Energizer 2500 mAh rechargeables. I was shocked to find that there was no recharge delay. The red light never even flickered. I could cycle my G3 as fast as I wanted. Sweet!
__________________
-Clint

..:: Canon EOS 30D :: Canon 18-135 IS & 50 f/1.4 & 70-200 f/4L :: SPEEDLITE 580EX & 430EX :: Kenko tubes :: PowerShot G3 ::..
rowdyred94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th of February 2007 (Sun)   #10
Wilt
Cream of the Crop
 
Wilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: California
Posts: 30,885
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

All flashes have to recycle. An external unit might NOT be faster on recycle than the on-board flash! The way to get fast recycle is to combine an external flash with an additional auxiliary battery pack which is designed to recycle the flash unit very quickly; an auxiliary battery pack might only offer more shots, without faster recycle (it depends on the auxiliary battery unit).
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention
Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
Wilt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th of February 2007 (Mon)   #11
AussieCat
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 522
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

i have the 400d

whats the full oficial tittle of this flahs

i have to get it

Quote:
Originally Posted by rowdyred94 View Post
I have a 430 and just switched from alkalines to Energizer 2500 mAh rechargeables. I was shocked to find that there was no recharge delay. The red light never even flickered. I could cycle my G3 as fast as I wanted. Sweet!
AussieCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th of February 2007 (Mon)   #12
AussieCat
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 522
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

u mean a batter grip yeah?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilt View Post
All flashes have to recycle. An external unit might NOT be faster on recycle than the on-board flash! The way to get fast recycle is to combine an external flash with an additional auxiliary battery pack which is designed to recycle the flash unit very quickly; an auxiliary battery pack might only offer more shots, without faster recycle (it depends on the auxiliary battery unit).
AussieCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th of February 2007 (Mon)   #13
Wilt
Cream of the Crop
 
Wilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: California
Posts: 30,885
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AussieCat View Post
u mean a batter grip yeah?
No, a battery grip powers the camera...I don't know if it affects the recycle time of the built-in flash or not.

I as referring to external battery packs, like the Quantum Turbo, which provide very fast charge times for flash units that are separate from the camera.
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention
Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
Wilt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of February 2007 (Thu)   #14
AussieCat
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 522
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

question to anyone


if i get an external flash

will this help with the recyle time of my external big flash??


Quote:
Originally Posted by Wilt View Post
No, a battery grip powers the camera...I don't know if it affects the recycle time of the built-in flash or not.

I as referring to external battery packs, like the Quantum Turbo, which provide very fast charge times for flash units that are separate from the camera.
AussieCat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th of February 2007 (Thu)   #15
Wilt
Cream of the Crop
 
Wilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: California
Posts: 30,885
Default Re: External flash compared to internal. 400D. XTI.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AussiCat
if i get an external flash. will this help with the recyle time of my external big flash??

AussieCat,

Your question is confusing. You have a camera, you do not have an external flash (yet). I have already replied that an external flash unit may not necessarily be any better than the in-camera flash for the recycle time, unless you have an external battery like a Quantum Turbo. and I have already replied that a battery grip does not help with recycle, it simply provides more shots.

Please state what you are considering adding to your kit. And what is 'will this help'...what is the antecedent of 'this'...what are you referring to
__________________
Canon dSLR system, Olympus OM 35mm system, Bronica ETRSi 645 system, Horseman LS 4x5 system, Metz flashes, Dynalite studio lighting, and too many accessories to mention
Keep POTN alive and well with member support http://photography-on-the.net/forum/donate.php
Wilt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LCD on 30D compared to 400D TMR Design Canon EOS Digital Cameras 5 7th of October 2006 (Sat) 15:27
350D-400D compared (What parameters can do) evandavies Canon EOS Digital Cameras 13 21st of September 2006 (Thu) 18:08
Q: Will the 20D internal flash trigger an external 420EX? JohnnyG Small Flash and Studio Lighting 3 17th of October 2005 (Mon) 03:41
Cascading Style Sheets - external vs internal Epicurean Version 1.0-1.5 discussion 4 13th of October 2005 (Thu) 12:35
External/Internal Flash Question ThomasL Canon G-series Digital Cameras 11 12th of May 2003 (Mon) 15:47


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 16:25.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.