Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing
Thread started 15 Feb 2007 (Thursday) 13:31
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Do you do your sharpening in RAW?

 
NorCalAl
Senior Member
966 posts
Joined Sep 2006
Paradise, CA, USA
Feb 15, 2007 13:31 |  #1

Or once it's converted? If you do sharpening in RAW, do you find differences in the different converters?
I wondered about conversion programs before and found that many, many folks asked the same questions and much like the 24-105 vs 24-70 debate, most folks had grown weary of answering yet another post on conversion apps.
But what I'm really wondering - and was then, too, just worded it poorly - is if you do your sharpening in RAW, do you find that you like one converter app over another? Or perhaps more importantly, is there an app you feel does a poor job of RAW sharpening?
I like the sharpening options in DxO, but find the app is very slow. Bibble is really fast, but the sharpening leaves much to be desired. And DPP is fast, has good (to me) sharpening, but lacks some of the flexibility of both Bibble and DxO. Then there's Lightroom...seems to sharpen well, pretty fast and has lots of flexibility.
I'd really love to just use one app, but it seems that different shots demand different processing. Or am I making too much of it?


Gear List

Nikon, the dark adventure begins...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
45,750 posts
Gallery: 69 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Feb 15, 2007 13:41 |  #2

I tend to do it only in PSCS after conversion.. but there are times I will do it in the raw converter.. particularly when I used to work with Captrue 1


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
drogos
Goldmember
drogos's Avatar
1,269 posts
Joined Jan 2007
CHICAGO
Feb 15, 2007 14:07 as a reply to CyberDyneSystems's post |  #3

i always do sharpening in Phase one capture to get a "usable " file and than if necessary i add some sharpnesss to eyes in ps ...it's tricky since what you see in phase one is not what you see afterwards in ps ...algorythm for sharpening is pretty strange and it almost looks like sharpening setting is override by some defaults ...so i tent to oversharpen in phase one (200%) to get just right on the spot in ps ..but well i guess there is never to late for sharpening but it can be defenetly to early at times


Lukasz Drogowski
Chicago Wedding Photographerexternal link
canon MARK III / 5D II / 5d / 24-70L, 50 1.4, 85 1.2 M2, 70-200 2.8 IS, Sigma 20mm 1.8 / 580ex / 580exII / 600ex

LOG IN TO REPLY
Bodog
Goldmember
Bodog's Avatar
1,306 posts
Joined Feb 2004
Peculiar, MO
Feb 15, 2007 14:23 as a reply to drogos's post |  #4

Something I read on some post processing guru's website (can't remember which) struck me as meaningful: Only sharpen enough at the conversion stage to offset any blurring caused by the de-mosaicing filter. I find that the default setting in C1 does a good job in that respect. Any further sharpening should be done after the conversion and depends on the individual image and it's intended use.


JimE
Color? It's all relative...

LOG IN TO REPLY
memorex88
Goldmember
memorex88's Avatar
1,472 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Montreal, Quebec Canada
Feb 15, 2007 14:40 as a reply to Bodog's post |  #5

I don't but I asked my wife if I could take a pic of her sharpening a knife in the nude, She refused :(


Marco
My Gear

LOG IN TO REPLY
cosworth
I'm comfortable with my masculinity
cosworth's Avatar
10,930 posts
Joined Jul 2005
Duncan, BC, Canada
Feb 15, 2007 14:42 |  #6

Hell no.

My sharpening is the last step in PP and involves an action with about 40 steps. RAW sharpening is not that precise.


people will always try to stop you doing the right thing if it is unconventional
Full frame and some primes.

LOG IN TO REPLY
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
ssim's Avatar
10,884 posts
Joined Apr 2003
southern Alberta, Canada
Feb 15, 2007 16:58 as a reply to cosworth's post |  #7

Depends on the image. I will sometimes give a very slight amount of sharpening in C1 Pro at the time I do my conversion.

It has long been the standard that sharpening should be your very last step in your post processing workflow. In the past year though, I have seen some of those same people say that they have started to do some very light sharpening at the time of conversion. Things do change and the software applications that support this sharpening have made progress as well.

This really boils down to a personal preference and how good your final product is. If doing an initial amount of sharpening works for you and the image benefits from it, I don't see an issue with doing it.


My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.
Sheldon Simpson | My Galleryexternal link | My Gear updated: 20JUL12

LOG IN TO REPLY
bsmotril
Goldmember
bsmotril's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
Austin TX
Feb 15, 2007 17:03 |  #8

Sharpening is one of the areas where Photoshop is superior to RAW. Most of the operations you do in RAW don't change the actual raw data, they just affect the metadata putting markers there that tells Photoshop how to do the Gamma correction, and present the image by way of setting the dark and highlight points in the data set. When you sharpen, you are actually changing pixel data, which is what PS does. When you sharpen in raw, all you do is change the way the thumbnail and JPEG image are presented on your screen, no pixel data is changed (or lost, which is the real benefit of adjusting all your levels, color, contrast, exposure, etc in RAW vs PS). Do your sharpening as your last processing step.


Gear List
Galleries: http://www.flickr.com/​photos/smopho/external link --- http://billsmotrilla.z​enfolio.com/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Beau ­ Hudspeth
-Cool Title-
Beau Hudspeth's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
On the "Highway to 'L' " with a cardboard sign reading - "Will photoshop for food" - Beaverton, Or.
Feb 15, 2007 21:20 |  #9

cosworth wrote in post #2714171external link
My sharpening is the last step in PP and involves an action with about 40 steps.

I'm curious to see that action please! :eek:


_______________
My FAVORITE ImageGear List

Photoshop Action SetMy Flickrexternal link
_______________

LOG IN TO REPLY
cgratti
Lord_Malone, your still a newb...
cgratti's Avatar
3,315 posts
Joined Feb 2004
E-A-G-L-E-S - EAGLES
Feb 15, 2007 22:04 |  #10

Dont sharpen in RAW, there is a better way to sharpen in PS.

Duplicate the layer.
Click FILTER>OTHER>HIGH PASS and at 7.0
The picture will now look Chrome and ugly.
Set the BLENDING MODE in the layers palette to SOFT OVERLAY and viola!



Canon 30D

Canon 10D
Canon 28-105 f/3.5-4.5 II USM
Apple iMac G5



LOG IN TO REPLY
Pete
Cream of the Crop
Pete's Avatar
38,607 posts
Joined Jul 2006
Feb 16, 2007 06:17 |  #11

No, Sharpening in ACR won't be much good at all. Although it's useful to start your noise reduction there.

I've found that actions and recipies for sharpening will give you acceptable, but not good results. The best sharpening is when it's tailored for the image itself (and even then targeted for parts of the image that actually need it). Multi-pass sharpening is the way to go, if you can spend the time doing it.


Pete
UK SE Catch of the Day

LOG IN TO REPLY
peber
Senior Member
peber's Avatar
250 posts
Joined Oct 2006
Sweden
Feb 16, 2007 06:25 |  #12

Pete wrote in post #2717723external link
No, Sharpening in ACR won't be much good at all. Although it's useful to start your noise reduction there.

I've found that actions and recipies for sharpening will give you acceptable, but not good results. The best sharpening is when it's tailored for the image itself (and even then targeted for parts of the image that actually need it). Multi-pass sharpening is the way to go, if you can spend the time doing it.

Slightly OT, is there a tutorial somewhere how to do multi-pass sharpening?

/Per


IT Consultant by trade, photographer by heart

LOG IN TO REPLY
tim
Light Bringer
tim's Avatar
50,645 posts
Joined Nov 2004
Wellington, New Zealand
Feb 16, 2007 06:55 |  #13

I'm a wedding photographer, I only occasionally sharpen. I've done my experiments, in print, not at the almost useless 100% view in photoshop. Take a look at the prints if you do and don't sharpen, after that you'll worry less. That's a good general rule: try it every way you can think of, print it, if your wife/girlfriend/whatev​er can't tell them apart then miss the step out, it's not important.


Professional wedding photographer, solution architect and general technical guy with multiple Amazon Web Services certifications.
Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc)

LOG IN TO REPLY
mace0002
Member
mace0002's Avatar
156 posts
Joined Dec 2006
Maine
Feb 16, 2007 07:21 |  #14

Beau Hudspeth wrote in post #2715966external link
I'm curious to see that action please! :eek:

I would too!!


be well,
Stace
www.staceydamonphotogr​aphy.comexternal link
www.myspace.com/stacey​damonexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
SuzyView
Cream of the Crop
SuzyView's Avatar
32,065 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Joined Oct 2005
Northern VA
Feb 16, 2007 07:23 |  #15

Never sharpen in RAW, only in PS.


Suzie - Still Speaking Canonese!
5DIV, 7D2, SL1, G12, iPad Pro, iPhone 6P, 5 L's & 2 Primes, 25 bags.
My children are the reason, but it's the passion that drives me to get the perfect image of everything.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

6,470 views & 0 likes for this thread
Do you do your sharpening in RAW?
FORUMS Post Processing, Marketing & Presenting Photos RAW, Post Processing & Printing


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00214 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.05s
Latest registered member is frankjackson1982
628 guests, 470 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016