LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 19 Mar 2007 (Monday) 10:20   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
9,752 posts
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I bought this lens as a result of seeing images posted on the forum as a travel lens. I had a chance to try it out over the weekend on a drive through the San Jaun mountains of southwest Colorado. It needs to be stopped down to at least f/5.6 to 8 and at the long end it needs f/11 or more. I avoid using it past 180mm as it becomes unacceptably soft for me. It's really an outdoor lens (or flash), but does provide very nice images if used within these limits.

Here's a shot from Durango, CO and a 100% crop at 33mm and f/8. (Compression for the forum is causing some pixelation issues.)

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #1, Mar 19, 2007 10:20:49


Gear list
"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
Zeiss 35/2 for sale.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Tony-S
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
9,752 posts
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

A couple more. First at f/8, 160mm, second at f/8, 21mm.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #2, Mar 19, 2007 10:25:58


Gear list
"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
Zeiss 35/2 for sale.

LOG IN TO REPLY
AginKajun
Goldmember
AginKajun's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
1,459 posts
Rehab center for Photoshop Addiction
[MORE/SHARE]

Great lens for what it is. Mine is just a tad soft at 200MM but from 175 down it is real sharp.

Heres one for the macro crowd. Shot at 1/320 F 6.3 at 105MM

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #3, Mar 21, 2007 09:00:50


Kajun Rule #1-Never try to teach a pig to sing.....It wastes your time and it annoys the pig.
More gear than talent.
http://photography-on-the.net ...?p=4871293&postcoun​t=1014

LOG IN TO REPLY
AginKajun
Goldmember
AginKajun's Avatar
Joined Mar 2006
1,459 posts
Rehab center for Photoshop Addiction
[MORE/SHARE]

Another for the landscape crowd. 18 MM f6.3 1/320

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #4, Mar 21, 2007 09:03:06


Kajun Rule #1-Never try to teach a pig to sing.....It wastes your time and it annoys the pig.
More gear than talent.
http://photography-on-the.net ...?p=4871293&postcoun​t=1014

LOG IN TO REPLY
DerekI
Senior Member
DerekI's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
752 posts
Chiang Mai .
[MORE/SHARE]

This one at least focuses better than my EF50F1.8 and it is ok for what it is designed to do .

I shot some flowers with it several days back and I like it more than I thought I would.

Post #5, Mar 21, 2007 13:50:04


Canon EOS40D(2).
EF-S17-55IS,EF70-300DOISUSM,EF-S60f2.8USM, EF-S55-250IS,EF-85f1.8USM.
Nikon D300, AFS12-24, AF-S16-85VR,AF-S18-200VR, AF-S70-300VR,AF35f2D.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/izumiflowers/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
DerekI
Senior Member
DerekI's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
752 posts
Chiang Mai .
[MORE/SHARE]

Oh link to my stupid shots here.

http://www.flickr.com ...s/izumiflowers/4225​18518/external link

Post #6, Mar 21, 2007 13:53:41


Canon EOS40D(2).
EF-S17-55IS,EF70-300DOISUSM,EF-S60f2.8USM, EF-S55-250IS,EF-85f1.8USM.
Nikon D300, AFS12-24, AF-S16-85VR,AF-S18-200VR, AF-S70-300VR,AF35f2D.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/izumiflowers/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
Joined Jan 2006
9,752 posts
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

OK, I've changed my opinion about its softness at 200mm. I think the softness in previous shots was because it was slightly out of focus. It appears my copy of this lens has a bit of trouble locking on focus at 200mm, perhaps because of the f/6.3 aperture. By focussing and then refocussing, it does a much better job of locking on the target. Of course, this means it's not going to be much good as a sports lens (or even for chasing kids around), but it does make it suitable as a travel lens, which is why I bought the thing in the first place.

I'm off to Chile Saturday for a week; I feel a lot better about taking this and leaving the 17-70 at home.

Here's a full-frame shot at f/8 and a 100% crop.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos.

Post #7, Mar 22, 2007 23:22:31 as a reply to DerekI's post 1 day earlier.


Gear list
"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.
Zeiss 35/2 for sale.

LOG IN TO REPLY
gorby
Senior Member
Joined Mar 2007
531 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

JEEZ that's looking good to me!


See I'm keen on this lens, but then all the 'bad press' scares me off, and then great pics like the ones in this thread bring me right back!

It's going to be between this or the sigma 70-300 DG APO

Post #8, Mar 23, 2007 02:01:59


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My workexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
darktiger
Goldmember
Joined Oct 2005
1,943 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

I like the lens, but I grew out if it real fast. For the money it is great. Then I went to the 24-105 and cannot believe the different....

Post #9, Mar 23, 2007 08:50:58


My Flickrexternal link
My Gear
My Zenfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ahh
Member
Joined May 2006
61 posts
London
[MORE/SHARE]

I bought this lens about a year and a half ago to replace my kit lens. I have been reasonably happy with the results. When used correctly, this lens can really produce.

Here are some pictures of St. Basil's Cathedral in the Red Square in Moscow.

None of the images have been processed other than being resized. They are straight out of the camera.

48mm f/9.0 1/250 ISO 200

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


106mm f/9.0 1/250 ISO 200
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


200mm f/11.0 1/125 ISO 200
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



And one of a man blowing his own trumpet! :D

200mm f/16 1/100 ISO 200
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Post #10, Mar 24, 2007 11:25:05


Canon 350D, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 OS, Canon 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM, Sigma 105 f/2.8 Macro, Canon 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 II

LOG IN TO REPLY
gorby
Senior Member
Joined Mar 2007
531 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Goodness, really great pics man!


Ok, it is between this and the sigma 55-200 for me. Of course the 18-200 has that killer range--- but is it worth it to pay twice as much for it!!?

Post #11, Mar 24, 2007 12:58:45


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My workexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
rooeey
-Shorty-
rooeey's Avatar
Joined May 2007
2,492 posts
Sydney Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

What to buy???
I have a 11-18 tamron a 90mm 1:1 Tamron macro a 75-300 canon and nifty fifty canon but i feel i lack a good walk around lens with indoor capabilities...
Am i looking for the 18-200 f3.5-6.3 or the 17-70 f2.8 ?

Post #12, Jun 24, 2007 23:30:03


1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...:cool:
http://s229.photobucke​t.com/albums/ee124/roo​eey/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
unix04
a title too
Joined Oct 2006
584 posts
City of Angels
[MORE/SHARE]

the 1770 is not a constant 2.8. i believe it is 2.8~4.5.
i think the 1770 will give you better images, but cant beat the convenience of the 18-200.
what is it that you really need?

Post #13, Jun 25, 2007 01:09:32


Currently:
Canon EOS 30D | 5D | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-105/4L IS USM | EF 70-200/2.8 IS USM | Speedlite 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
rooeey
-Shorty-
rooeey's Avatar
Joined May 2007
2,492 posts
Sydney Australia
[MORE/SHARE]

Well thats my dilemma...
I don't know i must research more but i think i will go the 17-70.

Post #14, Jun 25, 2007 03:47:28


1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...:cool:
http://s229.photobucke​t.com/albums/ee124/roo​eey/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
34,036 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Looks good to me. I'm considering the OS version because I moronically lugged everything I owned around at Disney (2 XTs & Grips, Bigma, Kit lens, 24-70L, 2 flashes, etc) just to "get everything" when I coulda done just fine with an all in one lens. Nothing was printed bigger than 4x6 anyway. :rolleyes:

Sometimes a simple 10D + 18-200 OS kit would be a lovely thing. :)

Post #15, Jun 25, 2007 04:13:48


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
10,105 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00127 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.03s
956 guests, 710 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Predrag

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.