Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 19 Mar 2007 (Monday) 10:20
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC

 
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
9,847 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Mar 19, 2007 10:20 |  #1

I bought this lens as a result of seeing images posted on the forum as a travel lens. I had a chance to try it out over the weekend on a drive through the San Jaun mountains of southwest Colorado. It needs to be stopped down to at least f/5.6 to 8 and at the long end it needs f/11 or more. I avoid using it past 180mm as it becomes unacceptably soft for me. It's really an outdoor lens (or flash), but does provide very nice images if used within these limits.

Here's a shot from Durango, CO and a 100% crop at 33mm and f/8. (Compression for the forum is causing some pixelation issues.)

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Tony-S
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
9,847 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Mar 19, 2007 10:25 |  #2

A couple more. First at f/8, 160mm, second at f/8, 21mm.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

LOG IN TO REPLY
AginKajun
Goldmember
AginKajun's Avatar
1,471 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Rehab center for Photoshop Addiction
Mar 21, 2007 09:00 |  #3

Great lens for what it is. Mine is just a tad soft at 200MM but from 175 down it is real sharp.

Heres one for the macro crowd. Shot at 1/320 F 6.3 at 105MM

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Kajun Rule #1-Never try to teach a pig to sing.....It wastes your time and it annoys the pig.
More gear than talent.
http://photography-on-the.net ...?p=4871293&postcoun​t=1014

LOG IN TO REPLY
AginKajun
Goldmember
AginKajun's Avatar
1,471 posts
Joined Mar 2006
Rehab center for Photoshop Addiction
Mar 21, 2007 09:03 |  #4

Another for the landscape crowd. 18 MM f6.3 1/320

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

Kajun Rule #1-Never try to teach a pig to sing.....It wastes your time and it annoys the pig.
More gear than talent.
http://photography-on-the.net ...?p=4871293&postcoun​t=1014

LOG IN TO REPLY
DerekI
Senior Member
DerekI's Avatar
752 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Chiang Mai .
Mar 21, 2007 13:50 |  #5

This one at least focuses better than my EF50F1.8 and it is ok for what it is designed to do .

I shot some flowers with it several days back and I like it more than I thought I would.


Canon EOS40D(2).
EF-S17-55IS,EF70-300DOISUSM,EF-S60f2.8USM, EF-S55-250IS,EF-85f1.8USM.
Nikon D300, AFS12-24, AF-S16-85VR,AF-S18-200VR, AF-S70-300VR,AF35f2D.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/izumiflowers/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
DerekI
Senior Member
DerekI's Avatar
752 posts
Joined Feb 2007
Chiang Mai .
Mar 21, 2007 13:53 |  #6

Oh link to my stupid shots here.

http://www.flickr.com ...s/izumiflowers/4225​18518/external link


Canon EOS40D(2).
EF-S17-55IS,EF70-300DOISUSM,EF-S60f2.8USM, EF-S55-250IS,EF-85f1.8USM.
Nikon D300, AFS12-24, AF-S16-85VR,AF-S18-200VR, AF-S70-300VR,AF35f2D.

http://www.flickr.com/​photos/izumiflowers/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
THREAD ­ STARTER
Cream of the Crop
Tony-S's Avatar
9,847 posts
Joined Jan 2006
Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
Mar 22, 2007 23:22 as a reply to DerekI's post |  #7

OK, I've changed my opinion about its softness at 200mm. I think the softness in previous shots was because it was slightly out of focus. It appears my copy of this lens has a bit of trouble locking on focus at 200mm, perhaps because of the f/6.3 aperture. By focussing and then refocussing, it does a much better job of locking on the target. Of course, this means it's not going to be much good as a sports lens (or even for chasing kids around), but it does make it suitable as a travel lens, which is why I bought the thing in the first place.

I'm off to Chile Saturday for a week; I feel a lot better about taking this and leaving the 17-70 at home.

Here's a full-frame shot at f/8 and a 100% crop.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

HOSTED PHOTO
please log in to view hosted photos in full size.

"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

LOG IN TO REPLY
gorby
Senior Member
531 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Mar 23, 2007 02:01 |  #8

JEEZ that's looking good to me!


See I'm keen on this lens, but then all the 'bad press' scares me off, and then great pics like the ones in this thread bring me right back!

It's going to be between this or the sigma 70-300 DG APO


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My workexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
darktiger
Goldmember
1,944 posts
Joined Oct 2005
Mar 23, 2007 08:50 |  #9

I like the lens, but I grew out if it real fast. For the money it is great. Then I went to the 24-105 and cannot believe the different....


My Flickrexternal link
My Gear
My Zenfolioexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
ahh
Member
61 posts
Joined May 2006
London
Mar 24, 2007 11:25 |  #10

I bought this lens about a year and a half ago to replace my kit lens. I have been reasonably happy with the results. When used correctly, this lens can really produce.

Here are some pictures of St. Basil's Cathedral in the Red Square in Moscow.

None of the images have been processed other than being resized. They are straight out of the camera.

48mm f/9.0 1/250 ISO 200

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


106mm f/9.0 1/250 ISO 200
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE


200mm f/11.0 1/125 ISO 200
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE



And one of a man blowing his own trumpet! :D

200mm f/16 1/100 ISO 200
IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
Byte size: ZERO | Content warning: NOT AN IMAGE

Canon 350D, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5, Sigma 18-200 f/3.5-6.3 OS, Canon 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM, Sigma 105 f/2.8 Macro, Canon 18-55 f/3.5-5.6 II

LOG IN TO REPLY
gorby
Senior Member
531 posts
Joined Mar 2007
Mar 24, 2007 12:58 |  #11

Goodness, really great pics man!


Ok, it is between this and the sigma 55-200 for me. Of course the 18-200 has that killer range--- but is it worth it to pay twice as much for it!!?


5D MKII | 650D [SIZE=2][SIZE=2][SIZE=​1]| 350D (RIP)
17-40 f/4L | 70-200 f/4L | 50mm 1.8 | 18-135 STM IS
My workexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
rooeey
-Shorty-
rooeey's Avatar
2,512 posts
Joined May 2007
Sydney Australia
Jun 24, 2007 23:30 |  #12

What to buy???
I have a 11-18 tamron a 90mm 1:1 Tamron macro a 75-300 canon and nifty fifty canon but i feel i lack a good walk around lens with indoor capabilities...
Am i looking for the 18-200 f3.5-6.3 or the 17-70 f2.8 ?


1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...:cool:
http://s229.photobucke​t.com/albums/ee124/roo​eey/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
unix04
a title too
584 posts
Joined Oct 2006
City of Angels
Jun 25, 2007 01:09 |  #13

the 1770 is not a constant 2.8. i believe it is 2.8~4.5.
i think the 1770 will give you better images, but cant beat the convenience of the 18-200.
what is it that you really need?


Currently:
Canon EOS 30D | 5D | EF 85mm f/1.8 USM | EF 24-105/4L IS USM | EF 70-200/2.8 IS USM | Speedlite 430EX

LOG IN TO REPLY
rooeey
-Shorty-
rooeey's Avatar
2,512 posts
Joined May 2007
Sydney Australia
Jun 25, 2007 03:47 |  #14

Well thats my dilemma...
I don't know i must research more but i think i will go the 17-70.


1D MK111 , 5D Classic,24-70F2.8, 16-35F2.8, 70-200F2.8 IS a 430EXII 2x 580EXII and a Mac...:cool:
http://s229.photobucke​t.com/albums/ee124/roo​eey/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
cdifoto
Don't get pissy with me
cdifoto's Avatar
34,039 posts
Joined Dec 2005
Jun 25, 2007 04:13 |  #15

Looks good to me. I'm considering the OS version because I moronically lugged everything I owned around at Disney (2 XTs & Grips, Bigma, Kit lens, 24-70L, 2 flashes, etc) just to "get everything" when I coulda done just fine with an all in one lens. Nothing was printed bigger than 4x6 anyway. :rolleyes:

Sometimes a simple 10D + 18-200 OS kit would be a lovely thing. :)


Did you lose Digital Photo Professional (DPP)? Get it hereexternal link. Cursing at your worse-than-a-map reflector? Check out this vid!external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

13,305 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 DC
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00112 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.04s
Latest registered member is GrantB
1006 guests, 564 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016