LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


HDR - San Francisco at sunset

FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Nature & Landscapes
Thread started 24 Mar 2007 (Saturday) 16:13   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
sirsloop
BigFoot
Joined Oct 2006
940 posts
South River, NJ
[MORE/SHARE]

I was out in SF on business this past week... I didn't get any time to sight see or anything, but I did manage to snap a couple HDR stacks from my room on the 15th floor of the JW Marriot in San Francisco...

This is an HDR shot from 17 images...


IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.jdhaesloop.​com/SF3.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #1, Mar 24, 2007 16:13:08


no gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
macroshooter1970
Cream of the Crop
macroshooter1970's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
7,491 posts
Arizona
[MORE/SHARE]

wow 17 images. did you really need that many?

Post #2, Mar 24, 2007 19:20:40




LOG IN TO REPLY
sirsloop
THREAD ­ STARTER
BigFoot
Joined Oct 2006
940 posts
South River, NJ
[MORE/SHARE]

lol... why not...

probably could have done it with 4 or 5 :)

Post #3, Mar 24, 2007 20:11:37


no gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
folville's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
1,022 posts
MN
[MORE/SHARE]

I think that the massive number of images may have contributed to the softness visible in the buildings, especially those in the lower left hand side of the image.

It's a nice idea, but I'd say that ambition was detrimental here.

Post #4, Mar 24, 2007 21:01:15


135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

LOG IN TO REPLY
JaertX
Goldmember
JaertX's Avatar
Joined Feb 2005
2,018 posts
Amarillo, Texas
[MORE/SHARE]

folville wrote in post #2925263external link
I think that the massive number of images may have contributed to the softness visible in the buildings, especially those in the lower left hand side of the image.

It's a nice idea, but I'd say that ambition was detrimental here.

2nd that. Although maybe it helped add some motion to the sky...that many stacked hurt the buildings more.

Post #5, Mar 24, 2007 21:07:35


Jason - I use Canon and stuff

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
macroshooter1970
Cream of the Crop
macroshooter1970's Avatar
Joined Jan 2007
7,491 posts
Arizona
[MORE/SHARE]

sirsloop wrote in post #2925073external link
lol... why not...

probably could have done it with 4 or 5 :)

like the others, it hurt the image I think. 3-4 at the most should be more than enough.

Post #6, Mar 24, 2007 22:19:54




LOG IN TO REPLY
sirsloop
THREAD ­ STARTER
BigFoot
Joined Oct 2006
940 posts
South River, NJ
[MORE/SHARE]

I actually went back and limited this to 5 shots and recreated.... results were no better or worse than before. In fact, I think having so many images helped with editing. The tonal curve and histogram was much wider... holding more info. FYI, all 17 shots were hand held so that explains a lot about softness. I also never added any sharpening during post processing..

a quick usm and its a bit different...

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.jdhaesloop.​com/SF4.jpgexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #7, Mar 25, 2007 03:59:32


no gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
kenyc
Cream of the Crop
kenyc's Avatar
Joined May 2005
15,425 posts
Denver, CO
[MORE/SHARE]

The second one is definitely better. Look at the air conditioning unit in the center, much crisper, sharper.

Nice sunrise.

KAC

Post #8, Mar 25, 2007 05:13:30


Kenny A. Chaffin
Art Pageexternal link - Photo Galleryexternal link - Art Print Galleryexternal link - Writing&Poetryexternal link
"Strive on with Awareness" - Siddhartha Gautama

LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
folville's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
1,022 posts
MN
[MORE/SHARE]

Now i think it's been oversharpened, so you have both the softness caused by slight differences in camera placement as well as the appearance of jpeg compression.

For this sort of shot you'll definitely need a tripod, even just a cheap one to keep your camera in place. Then you'll be golden.

Post #9, Mar 25, 2007 10:22:18


135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

LOG IN TO REPLY
sirsloop
THREAD ­ STARTER
BigFoot
Joined Oct 2006
940 posts
South River, NJ
[MORE/SHARE]

fyi... here's one exposure from the middle of the stack...

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://www.jdhaesloop.​com/sfs.JPGexternal link
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO

Post #10, Mar 25, 2007 11:24:34


no gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sonnyc
Cream of the Crop
Joined Jun 2005
5,077 posts
san jose
[MORE/SHARE]

How did you do it? You bracketed 17 shots with different settings and use PS2 HDR Merge feature? Did you use different TV or AV values?

The second one with 4-5 shots seemns to have some kind of ghosting around the edge of the building (or is it my laptop screen :) ).

Post #11, Mar 25, 2007 12:42:12


Sonny
websiteexternal link|Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
sirsloop
THREAD ­ STARTER
BigFoot
Joined Oct 2006
940 posts
South River, NJ
[MORE/SHARE]

Yep... HDR Merge, then used the mode: 8bit feature to bring it back to a viewable jpeg.

Both full size images are from all 17 images... the cropped shot of the mountain range was just a single exposure.

These are all ISO 800, F11, 10mm and vary from something like 1/400 to 1/5th handheld out of a Rebel XTi and ef10-22

Post #12, Mar 25, 2007 16:39:59


no gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
folville
Goldmember
folville's Avatar
Joined Dec 2006
1,022 posts
MN
[MORE/SHARE]

Obviously you can't go back and shoot these, but if you were to try the same type of thing again, it'd be suggested that you lower the iso rating and keep the shutter at a tolerably high level so that you can hand-hold without so much trouble (1/5th is really pushing it, even with a wide lens). Seeing them now, i'd say that you should definitely have opened the aperture just to give you more working room for other settings.

Post #13, Mar 26, 2007 20:44:06


135mm f/2.8 SF for sale

LOG IN TO REPLY
Alec ­ Trevelyan
Senior Member
Alec Trevelyan's Avatar
Joined Sep 2006
679 posts
Providence, RI
[MORE/SHARE]

2nd one is much better, though now jpeg compression is killing it ;)

Post #14, Mar 26, 2007 22:25:13


5D, 17-40mm f/4 L, 24-105 f/4 L IS

www.nhowephotography.c​om/Urbanexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
1,660 views & 0 likes for this thread
HDR - San Francisco at sunset
FORUMS Photo Sharing & Visual Enjoyment Nature & Landscapes



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.0014 for 5 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
775 guests, 595 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is N4Ld3

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.