Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 30 Mar 2007 (Friday) 18:21
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

"Bigma" versus "Dust Trombone" - Comparison

 
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Mar 30, 2007 18:21 |  #1

Well, after a few days of love and labor, I've posted my findings between the Sigma 50-500 F4-6.3 EX DG HSM and the Canon 100-400 F4.5-5.6 L IS USM.

You can find the link here and feel free to comment at any of the particular test pages http://www.pbase.com/l​ightrules/bigmapumpexternal link

Don't strain your eyes... :lol:




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
47,703 posts
Gallery: 78 photos
Joined Apr 2003
Rhode Island USA
Mar 30, 2007 18:33 |  #2

Great review/comparison.
I must say that we agree on these lenses to a frightening degree, though I never had them side by side.. (by the time I got the 100-400mm, my Bigma was long gone) my recollections are very similar.


GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photography (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
turbodude
Goldmember
turbodude's Avatar
2,707 posts
Joined Nov 2006
Las Vegas BABY!!!
Mar 30, 2007 18:34 |  #3

Awesome thanks again for teh review and comparison!


My Twitter: http://twitter.com/pow​ersimageryexternal link
My Blog:
http://powersimagery.c​om/blogexternal link

My Website: www.powersimagery.comexternal link
My Job: Vegas Magazineexternal link | Retna LTDexternal link | Tao/Lavo Las Vegasexternal link | Espn.comexternal link | UFCexternal link
My Gear:Gear List

LOG IN TO REPLY
David ­ S
Senior Member
David S's Avatar
559 posts
Joined Jul 2006
La Jolla, CA
Mar 30, 2007 18:40 |  #4

Great review. Good to see some real world shooting examples.


Leica M | Sony a7R | Fujfilm X-Pro 1
flickrexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
T ­ Kubik
Goldmember
T Kubik's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
San Francisco, CA
Mar 30, 2007 18:55 |  #5

looks like the L wins! The colors from the L are much nicer!

Though, for the price, the sigma is probably worth it!


-Tom
C&C always appreciated!
Gear list: 5D MKII + 24-70 2.8L II + 100mm 2.8L + 50mm 1.2L

http://WWW.TOMKUBIKPHO​TO.COM (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
CountryBoy's Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Okie
Mar 30, 2007 19:53 |  #6

I think they are really close. Except, as you noted. on the "edge" .Where the Canon, is better.

Very well done,as usual .

Any chance to see a Tamron 200-500 and Bigma showdown ? :D


Hi

LOG IN TO REPLY
cjm
Goldmember
cjm's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
Edmonton, Alberta
Mar 30, 2007 20:02 |  #7

"Dust trombone" :lol: That is so funny


Christopher John Martin
Gear: 5D MKIII - 1D MKIV - 24mm f1.4 L - 16-35mm f2.8 L - 24-70mm F2.8 L - 70-200mm IS f2.8 L - 50mm f1.2 L - 100mm MACRO f2.8 L - 300mm f4 IS L and more...
Join me at instagram.com/christop​herjohnmartin (external link)

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Tee Why's Avatar
10,596 posts
Joined Feb 2006
Pasadena, CA
Mar 30, 2007 21:48 |  #8

I think the dust pumper is slightly sharper at 200mm and 400mm which is interesting since it's at the end of it's focal length range. I noticed that the bokeh at 400mm is nicer on the bigma though.

I agree with you. I don't think the difference is big enough to show up on processed shots but the old pumper seems a tad sharper. I really didn't see much CA with either one of the zooms, so that 's a good thing.

Thanks for another good comparison. Now we can see that the difference is pretty small between the two.

Personally I'm a fan of the Bigma for the range and the price. I've used the dust pumper a few times and never liked the old style zoom, but I agree that this is a personal thing and you can easily learn to use either zoom with a little practice.

Now if Tokina only releases the 16-50, you can get some rest after testing that.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
grinchy
Senior Member
grinchy's Avatar
942 posts
Joined Jan 2007
Central Florida
Mar 30, 2007 22:07 |  #9

I keep hearing that the 100-400 is a "dust trombone" but have yet to see a claim that backs this up.....*-)


Body:
40D
Lenses:
Canon 50mm f/1.4
Canon 85mm f/1.8
Canon EF 24-105mm f/4
Misc:
580EX..Better Beamer..4 & 8gb Ridata 150X CF..Opteka Battery Grips..Kenko 1.4 TC..UV Filters..Lowepro Slingshot..Tripod

LOG IN TO REPLY
Hellashot
Goldmember
4,617 posts
Joined Sep 2004
USA
Mar 30, 2007 22:22 |  #10
banned

LightRules wrote in post #2957709external link
Well, after a few days of love and labor, I've posted my findings between the Sigma 50-500 F4-6.3 EX DG HSM and the Canon 100-400 F4.5-5.6 L IS USM.

You can find the link here and feel free to comment at any of the particular test pages http://www.pbase.com/l​ightrules/bigmapumpexternal link

Don't strain your eyes... :lol:

The only thing about your test is that the Bigma is very likely already at f6.3 at 200, 300, and 400mm because it never reports a minimum appeture of f6.3 so that your camera will be able to autofocus with it since the camera will "think" the appeture is f5.6 when it is really f6.3. Given that, the 100-400 is a bit sharper of a lens to get as good if not better sharpness than the Bigma when the Bigma is using smaller appetures.

I have the Bigma and it's a great value for the focal range. It's a great lens, but there are sharper lenses and much faster lenses too. :)


5D, Drebel, EOS-3, K1000
lenses from 12mm-500mm

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Mar 30, 2007 22:31 |  #11

Hellashot wrote in post #2958772external link
The only thing about your test is that the Bigma is very likely already at f6.3 at 200, 300, and 400mm because it never reports a minimum appeture of f6.3 so that your camera will be able to autofocus with it since the camera will "think" the appeture is f5.6 when it is really f6.3

Incorrect. The Bigma DG on my 20D test body reports (in Av mode) exactly what I posted at my main test page [max apertures of]: 100mm f5, 200mm f5.6, 300mm f5.6, 400mm f5.6, and 500mm f6.3. Again, only at around 460mm and on does it report f6.3.

Also, the 1-4 and Bigma, in Av mode, report identical shutter speeds when set to corresponding apertures, under identical lighting conditions. It isn't at f6.3 until around 450mm-460mm +.




LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Mar 30, 2007 22:35 |  #12

CountryBoy wrote in post #2958104external link
Any chance to see a Tamron 200-500 and Bigma showdown ? :D

Sorry, CB, no plans in the making. You can feel free to pick one up though and send it my way. :lol:




LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Mar 30, 2007 22:39 |  #13

grinchy wrote in post #2958692external link
I keep hearing that the 100-400 is a "dust trombone" but have yet to see a claim that backs this up.....*-)

I personally haven't seen much dust problem, but others seem to say otherwise. But it must have gotten its nick for some good reason :rolleyes:




LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
THREAD ­ STARTER
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
9,909 posts
Joined Jun 2005
Mar 30, 2007 22:42 |  #14

Tee Why wrote in post #2958583external link
Now if Tokina only releases the 16-50, you can get some rest after testing that

You're still loaning me your "good copy" of the Tamron 1750 for the comparo, right?! :cool:




LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
CountryBoy's Avatar
5,168 posts
Joined May 2006
Okie
Mar 30, 2007 22:58 |  #15

LightRules wrote in post #2958831external link
Sorry, CB, no plans in the making. You can feel free to pick one up though and send it my way. :lol:

I'll have to pass. :D

Think i'll just stick with my 100-300 for awhile longer. It does a decent job .:wink:


Hi

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

13,053 views & 0 likes for this thread
"Bigma" versus "Dust Trombone" - Comparison
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses


Not a member yet? Click here to register to the forums.
Registered members get all the features: search, following threads, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, settings, view hosted photos, own reviews and more...


AAA

Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Privacy policy and cookie usage info.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.4version 1.4
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.00141 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is susanac
917 guests, 483 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6106, that happened on Jun 09, 2016