Change in photo gallery software

alanuk · 12th of April 2004 (Mon)

Hi

I'm experimenting with Coppermine Photo Gallery php software to replace the present software from 4images. Have a look at http://www.ardpix.co.uk/pics/index.php and see what you think. 2 of the galleries on the page are with Canon EOS 10D.

I'm still using the Gallery software from http://gallery.menalto.com/ - see http://www.ardpix.co.uk/gallery/albums.php.

Not sure which one I prefer!

Best wishes.

ingouk · 21st of July 2004 (Wed)

i use both version.
Gallery is used for a scouting website. It was easier to integrate with the existing design. its easy to use and easy to customise.

Coppermine i use for my own gallery. I quiet like the batch upload function. The server is hosted inhouse (livingroom). SO i can dump complete directories with photos into coppermine via "My Network Places" and then add them via batch upload. no ftp, etc.

alanuk · 22nd of July 2004 (Thu)

I've now integrated Gallery with my main site at www.alanrolfe.co.uk which is managed through Mambo, a content managment system. The version I'm using does have a batch upload facility through a Java applet.

12th of April 2004 (Mon)	#1
alanuk Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Southampton, UK Posts: 128	Change in photo gallery software Hi I'm experimenting with Coppermine Photo Gallery php software to replace the present software from 4images. Have a look at http://www.ardpix.co.uk/pics/index.php and see what you think. 2 of the galleries on the page are with Canon EOS 10D. I'm still using the Gallery software from http://gallery.menalto.com/ - see http://www.ardpix.co.uk/gallery/albums.php. Not sure which one I prefer! Best wishes.

22nd of July 2004 (Thu)	#3
alanuk Member Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Southampton, UK Posts: 128	I've now integrated Gallery with my main site at www.alanrolfe.co.uk which is managed through Mambo, a content managment system. The version I'm using does have a batch upload facility through a Java applet. __________________ Alan http://www.alanrolfe.net/portal/gallery2/main.php http://www.alanrolfe.com

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Huego Gallery - user friendly and elegant photo gallery software	huegostudio	Presentation	0	22nd of May 2006 (Mon) 21:23
Photo Gallery Software for the Apple	Stooge_UK	Presentation	3	30th of November 2005 (Wed) 23:26
Photo Gallery Software	trevor51590	General Photography Talk	6	25th of May 2005 (Wed) 07:37
Photo gallery software	A20 user	RAW, Post Processing and Printing	3	16th of November 2003 (Sun) 13:22
Photo Gallery Software	Sheddtech	Presentation	1	25th of April 2002 (Thu) 14:01

21st of July 2004 (Wed)	#2
ingouk Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Posts: 54	i use both version. Gallery is used for a scouting website. It was easier to integrate with the existing design. its easy to use and easy to customise. Coppermine i use for my own gallery. I quiet like the batch upload function. The server is hosted inhouse (livingroom). SO i can dump complete directories with photos into coppermine via "My Network Places" and then add them via batch upload. no ftp, etc.