![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
|
Just out of curiosity, now that there is a firmware hack for the 300D which gives a lot more features (See http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/re...essage=7500111) how do you see the 300D vs. the D70 debate?
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 832
|
Well, From what I have read on the net and some photo magazines the D70 has more in common with the 10D than the 300D. Now if Canon actually releases a firmware update enabling some of the most requested features that should help bring things back in line.
Just my two cents. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gig Harbor, WA
Posts: 832
|
Well, From what I have read on the net and some photo magazines the D70 has more in common with the 10D than the 300D. Now if Canon actually releases a firmware update enabling some of the most requested features that should help bring things back in line.
Just my two cents. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 | |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Outside of Chicago
Posts: 4,246
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
|
I've heard from some D70 owners and the only things that differ now are the colors between the bodies, the dial being in the back (much like on the 10D) and a dynamic buffer.
Canon hasn't released a software update yet but you can download a hack and put that firmware on your 300D. You can always put back the normal firmware if you have warrenty work that needs to be done. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator |
No doubt the D70 is a winner.If i was buying again i might consider one but then there are the issues of having to buy expensive new nikkor lenses -allways more $ than equivilant eos and very rare and overpriced 2nd hand.
Also not sure yet of the image 'character'.I really like the gentle realistic colour of canons |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Cream of the Crop
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 5,466
|
Quote:
Regards, Scott
__________________
One World, One Voice Against Terror, Best Regards, Scott We're Not Afraid ScottBergerPhotography |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: S. E. Michigan
Posts: 44,022
|
Quote:
__________________
FrankC - 20D, RAW, Manual everything... Classic Carz, Racing, Air Show, Flowers. www.FrankCizek.com Find the light... A few Car Lighting Tips, and MOVE YOUR FEET! Have you thought about making your own book? / The new default version of FireFox is color managed! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Compensating for his small ... sensor
|
What I find most astonishing about the D70 is its (top) CF write speed according to Rob Galbraith's database ... http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...?cid=6007-6425
Top speed is 4600 kb/sec vs. 3200 kb/sec on the 1D or the very meager 1305 kb/sec on the 10D/300D. That means it's exactly 3 times faster than the 10D at writing the pictures to the CF card. That seems considerable to me. Best regards, Andy |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Admin - MOD OF STEEL...
|
It is considerable andy!
I can't fathom Canon's adherence to such slow write speeds.. granted the 1D was the fastest for years.. no shame there with a 3 plus year old design.. But the 10D-Drebel... slow as molasses at card write.. I wonder how much faster the MkII will be? I am truly doubting that it will be as fast as the D2H which is the current speed champion for card writing.
__________________
-DRY SEASON- 21 days across Namibia and Botswana Main Gallery GEAR LIST CDS' HOT LINKS My POTN Share Threads Are you shooting HAMSTTR©? ".. It's the customer support Stupid... ... |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 198
|
The D70 wins hands down in terms of responsiveness, card writing and feature set..BUT, it's two different systems.
You buy into Nikon or Canon or Leica or Contax, etc. because of the lenses. It's up to you to figure out what you want from each companies range of lenses. -hza |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
__________________
Ken www.motorpix.co.uk Professional Motorsport Photographer 1D & 1D MK-II, 17-40L, 24-70L, 70-200 2.8L IS, 100-400L, 300 2.8L IS, 500 4.0L IS, 85 1.8, 50 1.4, 1.4 & 2.0 MK-II TC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: South Florida, USA
Posts: 805
|
I am not sure that you can really compare the D70 with the Digital Rebel. It seems the only way you can compare the two is by price only that is it. The Nikon blows away the digital Rebel in performance and it should, as it is a new model. If you want to compare Nikon and Canon then the match will be Canon 10D VS the D70 Nikon and the Nikon wins with it's low price and larger buffer over the 10D and faster A/F performance and great flash system which to me looks like a version of Canon ETTL II in Canon terms. I would also like to say I have never ever owned a Nikon camera in my life and am canon all the way! I how ever did play with my friends D70 this week and was very impressed and in the same time disappointed with my 10D. The Nikon is very very fast in A/F and the White balance was much better out of the camera VS the 10D. It seems to me that the 10D needs replacing soon. It needs ETTL II and the new DIGIC chip and a faster A/F and better out of camera white balance with less processing. Also the Nikon soft ware is much better.
Angelo |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 3,786
|
All the reviews I've been reading about the Nikon D70 have been VERY VERY GOOD. In terms of features, performance, build, image quality and value, Nikon hit it right on the bullseye. And its black!!! It definitely has a big advantage over the Rebel and is almost on par with the Canon 10D.
For me though, it's just "L"acking something......... I wonder what it is.............. Ro1 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Goldmember
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,034
|
Frankly, I'm quite surprised to see statements like "no doubt D70 is a better camera" or "The Nikon blows away the digital Rebel in performance and it should, as it is a new model", or "I'm Canon all the way". ( I don't mean any disrespect here, I know that some people have very strong opinions)
Also, I doubt that some of the facts in previous posts are correct, for example D70 has faster A/F. I always thought that with a DSLR A/F depends on the lens. No doubt D70 has more features, but does it mean it's a better camera? For some people yes, for others not. Does it take better pictures? I don't think so. The Drebel has an advantage of ISO 100 extremely low noise pictures. The Drebel produces cleaner pcitures at high ISO setting too. For an average user, probably, the difference in image quality is not very significant. But an average user is not going to use advanced features of a D70 like spot meter. And I believe that with right post-processing one gets better quality pictures from a low noise censor like the DRebel has. The bottom line is, if you are looking for a new DSLR, don't let strong, one dimensional opinions like above influence your decision. It's all relative and a D70 may be or may be not the right camera for you. Of course, D70 is a great camera, but it does not make DRebel a bad one. They all have their strong and weak sides. Study all the details and see what's right for you. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sorry, another 300D vs D70 thread | Aylwin | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 10 | 13th of July 2004 (Tue) 05:47 |
| The worst thing on 300D compared with D70 | mariusnagy | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 16 | 16th of April 2004 (Fri) 16:47 |
| a D70 rebel debate | timmyquest | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 11 | 2nd of April 2004 (Fri) 15:42 |
| D70 the 300D Killer? | pradeep1 | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 74 | 6th of February 2004 (Fri) 21:46 |
| A new competitor to 300D: Nikon D70 is out of the bag | Cadenza | Canon EOS Digital Cameras | 25 | 29th of January 2004 (Thu) 09:15 |