LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


What makes an L an L?

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 15 Apr 2007 (Sunday) 18:14   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
Schipperke
Senior Member
Joined Sep 2006
159 posts
Seattle
[MORE/SHARE]

If this is somewhere else please point it out.

What makes an L an L?

Thanks

Post #1, Apr 15, 2007 18:14:18


EOS 7D, 40D, Ef 24-70mm 2.8 L, Tamron SP AF 17-50MM f/2.8, EF100 f/2.8 USM, Tokina AT-X 535 PRO DX(50-135), multiple Speedlites, multiple AlienBee's, & CS3, and other stuff...

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ghms421
Senior Member
ghms421's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
471 posts
Bethesda,MD
[MORE/SHARE]

They all have a red ring, which is why everyone writes the L in red, just like you have.

Post #2, Apr 15, 2007 18:29:52




LOG IN TO REPLY
ct ­ dub12
Member
Joined Jul 2006
99 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

they have better glass most of the time, larger apertures most of the time, constant apertures most of the time. red rings.

Post #3, Apr 15, 2007 18:40:39 as a reply to ghms421's post 10 minutes earlier.




LOG IN TO REPLY
AirBrontosaurus
Goldmember
AirBrontosaurus's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
3,813 posts
Indianapolis, Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

Canon's highest build quality, they each have at least one special fluoride glass element, Canon's best color reproduction and saturation, best flare control, and all around Canon's "best" lenses. They cost a lot though. To some they're worth it, to others they aren't.

Post #4, Apr 15, 2007 19:01:34


Chris | My Flickrexternal link | AirBrontosaurus.comexternal link | Peleng 8mm Fisheye writeupexternal link
Body
: Canon 5D
Lenses: Canon 24-105mm f/4 L | Canon MP-E 65mm Macro | Canon 85mm f/1.8 |

LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
_aravena's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
12,401 posts
Back in the 757
[MORE/SHARE]

It's mainly the glass. They use different glass in the L's just as Sigma does with APO, Nikon with ED, etc.

Better overall build as well cause they do take their time on these beauties, but it's glass and build.

Post #5, Apr 15, 2007 19:28:24


Last Shot Photography
My Siteexternal link ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
StealthLude
Goldmember
StealthLude's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
3,680 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Dont forget AF peformance as well. Their USM lenses like the 300mm 2.8 IS L has the fastest AF in the world when paired with a 1 series camera.

The camera has a lot to do with it, but lenses like the 70-200 are also very fast on a standard body like a 20D.

But yes, it comes back to build and glass are the main reasons. Id say they are pretty durable. I baby my gear so I have no idea HOW durable, but they are built for profesional use.

Post #6, Apr 15, 2007 19:33:53


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

LOG IN TO REPLY
StealthLude
Goldmember
StealthLude's Avatar
Joined Dec 2005
3,680 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

To add to what I had to say, just because its got a red L, doesnt mean its the best either.

Ive seen and used plenty of non L lenses that preform amazing with L type optics. 100mm Macro is one that I hold in very high regards as a non L lens.

Post #7, Apr 15, 2007 19:35:56


[[Gear List]]

Skype: Stealthlude

LOG IN TO REPLY
godzakka
Senior Member
Joined Mar 2007
348 posts
Jacksonville, FL
[MORE/SHARE]

I'm suprised no one said it: because Canon said so.

As others have said, it (to my knowledge) always has special glass (such as aspherical or flouride elements) and better build quality, among other things.

Post #8, Apr 15, 2007 20:07:20




LOG IN TO REPLY
AirBrontosaurus
Goldmember
AirBrontosaurus's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
3,813 posts
Indianapolis, Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

L's must also be compatible with FF bodies, so no EF-S lens can be an L.

Post #9, Apr 15, 2007 20:46:32


Chris | My Flickrexternal link | AirBrontosaurus.comexternal link | Peleng 8mm Fisheye writeupexternal link
Body
: Canon 5D
Lenses: Canon 24-105mm f/4 L | Canon MP-E 65mm Macro | Canon 85mm f/1.8 |

LOG IN TO REPLY
august23
Sensitive + Shopoholic = chick?
august23's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
3,123 posts
Bergen County, New Jersey
[MORE/SHARE]

L's also make you a better photographer. If you don't become a better photographer from the glass you use, you're not using an L.

Post #10, Apr 15, 2007 20:49:08



LOG IN TO REPLY
Sir ­ Tony
Senior Member
Sir Tony's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
265 posts
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
[MORE/SHARE]

http://www.the-digital-picture.com .../Canon-L-Lens-Series.aspxexternal link

Post #11, Apr 15, 2007 21:12:25


Canon EOS 30D and EOS 3 (35mm Film)
Canon 24-70mm f/2.8L
Cambo SC w/ 150mm Caltar II-N f/5.6 (4x5)
My Gear
http://www.flickr.com/​photos/61776846@N00/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Eagle
Goldmember
Eagle's Avatar
Joined May 2005
4,300 posts
Akron, Ohio
[MORE/SHARE]

AirBrontosaurus wrote in post #3047735external link
L's must also be compatible with FF bodies, so no EF-S lens can be an L.

Is that stated somewhere by Canon. I know there are no EF-S currently that are L but who's to say they don't make one in the future.

Post #12, Apr 15, 2007 21:25:37 as a reply to Sir Tony's post 13 minutes earlier.


7D ■ 10-22 ■ 15-85 ■ 28-135 ■ Σ 50-150 ■ 70-200 f4L ■ 100-400L ■ 580EX II
Gear-PCSmugMugexternal link ShutterStockexternal link Alamyexternal link Eagle's Nest Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
AirBrontosaurus
Goldmember
AirBrontosaurus's Avatar
Joined Sep 2005
3,813 posts
Indianapolis, Indiana
[MORE/SHARE]

Eagle wrote in post #3047912external link
Is that stated somewhere by Canon. I know there are no EF-S currently that are L but who's to say they don't make one in the future.

I think that's just built into the L definition. But, I suppose I could be wrong.

Post #13, Apr 15, 2007 21:55:36


Chris | My Flickrexternal link | AirBrontosaurus.comexternal link | Peleng 8mm Fisheye writeupexternal link
Body
: Canon 5D
Lenses: Canon 24-105mm f/4 L | Canon MP-E 65mm Macro | Canon 85mm f/1.8 |

LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
_aravena's Avatar
Joined Feb 2007
12,401 posts
Back in the 757
[MORE/SHARE]

Yeah, I don't see it. I think the EF-S thing was a failed experiment. Maybe not, but who knows.

Post #14, Apr 15, 2007 21:58:05


Last Shot Photography
My Siteexternal link ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

LOG IN TO REPLY
Richard7481
Member
Joined May 2006
79 posts
Kawasaki, Japan
[MORE/SHARE]

I think the EF-S line already has an "L" in the form of the 17-55.

Post #15, Apr 15, 2007 21:59:01


Canon EOS 30D
Canon EF 17-40 mm f/4L USM
Canon EF 70-200 mm f/4L IS USM
Canon EF 50 mm f/1.8 II
Canon EF 85 mm f/1.8 USM

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,301 views & 0 likes for this thread
What makes an L an L?
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00115 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
775 guests, 595 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is N4Ld3

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.