LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Are IBM Microdrives that fragile

FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras
Thread started 22 May 2001 (Tuesday) 04:34   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
BobP
Hatchling
Joined May 2001
5 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

The last few days I have checked a lot of digital photography forums looking for IBM Microdrive reviews.
I have read some reviews where people are telling that the Microdives are to fragile.

Are they really that fragile? Isn't it to risky buying one?

Post #1, May 22, 2001 04:34:21




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
Don ­ Cohen
Mostly Lurking
Joined May 2001
17 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Hi Bob,

In my experience with a 1 gb MicroDrive, and from the posts I've read over the past 6 months, I do not believe they are at all fragile.

That said, relative to Compact Flash Type I, which has no moving parts at all, they will be more susceptible to mechanical damage should any significant jarring occur (for example dropping on a hard floor from a significant height). I don't believe normal handling is likely to result in any damage. They are little tiny hard drives, with moving parts, so there is some potential - but I personally believe this is minimal (again, with reasonably careful handling).

Hope this helps.

Post #2, May 22, 2001 08:19:30




LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ K
Goldmember
Mike K's Avatar
Joined Apr 2001
1,637 posts
San Francisco area
[MORE/SHARE]

On these forums, the most vocal are those that have something to say, and when one of these microdrives crashes and takes some images with it one would be upset enough to say pleanty. Some very informal polls on the Canon DPReview fourm seem to place the total number of actual lifetime hardware crashes at about 6-10%. Maybe it is like your chances of getting hot pixels on a new digicam? I think if you keep the microdrive in the camera as much as possible it is far safer than handling the minature disc drive. Another thread asked to see how many (previously silent) happy users there were and the thread quickly grew to about 100 responses. But this story takes the cake:
http://www.dpreview.co​m ...23&page=2&message=1​052922external link
Regards, Mike K

Post #3, May 23, 2001 01:37:09


Canon 6D, 1DmkII, IR modified 5DII with lots of Canon L, TSE and Zeiss ZE lenses

LOG IN TO REPLY
pradeep1
Goldmember
pradeep1's Avatar
Joined Sep 2003
2,320 posts
Georgia, USA
[MORE/SHARE]

This was an old thread. Now that microdrives are being replaced by huge CF cards, does anyone care to comment on this?

Post #4, Apr 19, 2004 16:12:03


Please view my portfolioexternal link.

LOG IN TO REPLY
nomel
Senior Member
Joined Aug 2003
200 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

With the drive in the camera, the camera probably has a higher chance of breaking.

You might corrupt data if you bang the camera while the drive is writting. But, if it's not writting, I would think the camera would break before the drive :)

Post #5, Apr 19, 2004 22:46:31




LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
dicky109
Senior Member
dicky109's Avatar
Joined Feb 2003
697 posts
SC & NJ USA
[MORE/SHARE]

I've had my IBM 1G Microdrive for 3 years without any problem whatsoever. Its been used in my camera and Ipaq and has always performed.
That said, theoretically, having mechanical parts it should fail more readily than a CF card. Therefore since the price of large CF cards has come down, if I need more storage, I'd probably go that route.
Bottom line, IMO if you want to save a few bucks and still have reliable storage, you can't go wrong with the IBM/Hitachi Microdrive. From what I've read other brands are not as reliable. On the other hand, if you tend to obsess about the possible problems, go with a CF card.

Post #6, Apr 19, 2004 23:01:29


Rich B
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt"--Bertrand Russell

LOG IN TO REPLY
mookiemeister
Senior Member
Joined Jan 2004
109 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Someone told me once that IBM Microdrive is faster than the typical compact flash card. Is this true? If so, how much faster is the Microdrive?

Post #7, Apr 19, 2004 23:24:02




LOG IN TO REPLY
LittleG.
Senior Member
LittleG.'s Avatar
Joined Nov 2002
104 posts
UK
[MORE/SHARE]

Same as Rich. I've had my 1 gig Microdrive for a long time and I haven't had a single problem with it yet [ooooh touch wood quickly]. As for writing speed, I haven't noticed a difference between the Microdrive and CF cards. I'm not sure what the techies would say on that one but I would be interested.

Post #8, Apr 20, 2004 01:11:02


Happy Daze! :D
http://www.photo-art-gallery.comexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnS
Hatchling
Joined Apr 2002
5 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Having a ~3yr old 1GB MD card, it's always worked perfectly in the D30 and now the Pro1. Its used for transferring files across PC/MACs (old skool sneakernet) and though it looks a bit battered, has never failed. It's been in iPaqs as well, though now it goes into the iPod Media Reader :)

Highly recommended if storage capacity is the main concern.

Post #9, Apr 21, 2004 13:40:58




LOG IN TO REPLY
nikee
Member
Joined Jun 2003
49 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

mookiemeister wrote:
Someone told me once that IBM Microdrive is faster than the typical compact flash card. Is this true? If so, how much faster is the Microdrive?

no, that's not true. even if the microdrive is not that slow, there are cards like the sandisk extreme and ultra (1gb and 2gb) that outperform a microdrive easily (40% faster).

have a look at this database, its data differs for each tested camera as well:
http://www.robgalbrait​h.com/bins/multi_page.​asp?cid=6007external link

regards
nicola

Post #10, Apr 26, 2004 12:35:50




LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
2,581 views & 0 likes for this thread
Are IBM Microdrives that fragile
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00127 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.01s
1111 guests, 849 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is sbeecher

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.