Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
Thread started 22 May 2001 (Tuesday) 04:34
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Are IBM Microdrives that fragile

 
BobP
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined May 2001
     
May 22, 2001 04:34 |  #1

The last few days I have checked a lot of digital photography forums looking for IBM Microdrive reviews.
I have read some reviews where people are telling that the Microdives are to fragile.

Are they really that fragile? Isn't it to risky buying one?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Don ­ Cohen
Mostly Lurking
17 posts
Joined May 2001
     
May 22, 2001 08:19 |  #2

Hi Bob,

In my experience with a 1 gb MicroDrive, and from the posts I've read over the past 6 months, I do not believe they are at all fragile.

That said, relative to Compact Flash Type I, which has no moving parts at all, they will be more susceptible to mechanical damage should any significant jarring occur (for example dropping on a hard floor from a significant height). I don't believe normal handling is likely to result in any damage. They are little tiny hard drives, with moving parts, so there is some potential - but I personally believe this is minimal (again, with reasonably careful handling).

Hope this helps.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Mike ­ K
Goldmember
Avatar
1,637 posts
Joined Apr 2001
Location: San Francisco area
     
May 23, 2001 01:37 |  #3

On these forums, the most vocal are those that have something to say, and when one of these microdrives crashes and takes some images with it one would be upset enough to say pleanty. Some very informal polls on the Canon DPReview fourm seem to place the total number of actual lifetime hardware crashes at about 6-10%. Maybe it is like your chances of getting hot pixels on a new digicam? I think if you keep the microdrive in the camera as much as possible it is far safer than handling the minature disc drive. Another thread asked to see how many (previously silent) happy users there were and the thread quickly grew to about 100 responses. But this story takes the cake:
http://www.dpreview.co​m …23&page=2&messa​ge=1052922 (external link)
Regards, Mike K


Canon 6D, 1DmkII, IR modified 5DII with lots of Canon L, TSE and Zeiss ZE lenses

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
pradeep1
Goldmember
Avatar
2,320 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Sep 2003
Location: Georgia, USA
     
Apr 19, 2004 16:12 |  #4

This was an old thread. Now that microdrives are being replaced by huge CF cards, does anyone care to comment on this?


Please view my portfolio (external link).

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nomel
Member
200 posts
Joined Aug 2003
     
Apr 19, 2004 22:46 |  #5

With the drive in the camera, the camera probably has a higher chance of breaking.

You might corrupt data if you bang the camera while the drive is writting. But, if it's not writting, I would think the camera would break before the drive :)




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
dicky109
Senior Member
Avatar
698 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Feb 2003
Location: SC & NJ USA
     
Apr 19, 2004 23:01 |  #6

I've had my IBM 1G Microdrive for 3 years without any problem whatsoever. Its been used in my camera and Ipaq and has always performed.
That said, theoretically, having mechanical parts it should fail more readily than a CF card. Therefore since the price of large CF cards has come down, if I need more storage, I'd probably go that route.
Bottom line, IMO if you want to save a few bucks and still have reliable storage, you can't go wrong with the IBM/Hitachi Microdrive. From what I've read other brands are not as reliable. On the other hand, if you tend to obsess about the possible problems, go with a CF card.


Rich B
"The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt"--Bertrand Russell

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
mookiemeister
Member
109 posts
Joined Jan 2004
     
Apr 19, 2004 23:24 |  #7

Someone told me once that IBM Microdrive is faster than the typical compact flash card. Is this true? If so, how much faster is the Microdrive?




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
LittleG.
Member
Avatar
104 posts
Joined Nov 2002
Location: UK
     
Apr 20, 2004 01:11 |  #8

Same as Rich. I've had my 1 gig Microdrive for a long time and I haven't had a single problem with it yet [ooooh touch wood quickly]. As for writing speed, I haven't noticed a difference between the Microdrive and CF cards. I'm not sure what the techies would say on that one but I would be interested.


Happy Daze! :D
http://www.photo-art-gallery.com (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
JohnS
Hatchling
5 posts
Joined Apr 2002
     
Apr 21, 2004 13:40 |  #9

Having a ~3yr old 1GB MD card, it's always worked perfectly in the D30 and now the Pro1. Its used for transferring files across PC/MACs (old skool sneakernet) and though it looks a bit battered, has never failed. It's been in iPaqs as well, though now it goes into the iPod Media Reader :)

Highly recommended if storage capacity is the main concern.




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
nikee
Member
49 posts
Joined Jun 2003
     
Apr 26, 2004 12:35 |  #10

mookiemeister wrote:
Someone told me once that IBM Microdrive is faster than the typical compact flash card. Is this true? If so, how much faster is the Microdrive?

no, that's not true. even if the microdrive is not that slow, there are cards like the sandisk extreme and ultra (1gb and 2gb) that outperform a microdrive easily (40% faster).

have a look at this database, its data differs for each tested camera as well:
http://www.robgalbrait​h.com/bins/multi_page.​asp?cid=6007 (external link)

regards
nicola




  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

3,179 views & 0 likes for this thread
Are IBM Microdrives that fragile
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon G-series Digital Cameras 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.1forum software
version 2.1 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is thisisntme
748 guests, 394 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.