![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
I am immune
|
I was having a thought this morning in the traffic on the way in to work (uh oh).
My wife has a 2GB MicroSD card in her phone, an insane amount of storage in a small space. This got me thinking, how many of these could I squeeze into the same space as a CF card? Here is the maths: A MicroSD card is 11x15x1mm, so that is 165 cubic mm's. The current maximum capacity is 2GG, so that is 82.5 cubic mm per GB (CMMGB - my new storage density measurement A Type 1 CF card is 36.4x42.8x3.3mm which is 5141.136 cubic mm's. So based on a storage density of 82.5 CMMGB a CF1 card should be able to store 62.3GB! Do the same calc on CF2 and you get a massive 94.4GB OK I know I haven't taken into account area loss in connectors and controllers, or the fact CF and SD have different memory technologies but surely even if we half the CMMGB we still end up with 30GB CFs. Enough early morning rambling... |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009 |
I think you should hence forth be known as Mr Thinkstoomuch
__________________
Anke 1D Mark IV | 16-35L II | 24-70 f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 100L Macro | 50 f/1.4 | 580EX II Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter | Tunbridge Wells | Flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,019
|
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: from Yorkshire, England now living in Spain
Posts: 295
|
oh! my head hurts now!
__________________
Silence is Golden.....Duck Tape is Silver! |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
|
now the question is what is the maximum supported size by the cameras
__________________
--------------------------------- 50D, Rebel XT, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8 IS, 28-135 IS,430EX, AT858 Everything you wanted to know about aftermarket batteries |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
I am immune
|
Hmmm probably better than 'I'm Imune'
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
|
lol thats crazy Mr Thinkstoomuch
i would be scared of using one of those though...... 60gb of images lost when i do something stupid lol
__________________
-Eric -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- "Imagination is more important than knowledge." -Einstein |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
...the definition of a noob
|
Holy Crap, I think that's more memory in one card than all of NASA's computers had on the Moon Launching, and those filled a warehouse or two.
I've gone as far as 8gb. On my 1DsMKII, shooting RAW, that's a minimum of 400 and a max of 430 shots depending on ISO setting. Even that is an awful lot of eggs to place in one basket. me |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Essex & Gower UK
Posts: 1,329
|
I'm currently using multiple 2G cards (200 shots per card RAW and small jpg on a 30D). This is enough for me. As said previously, "Eggs in baskets". Cards fail and when they do it is without warning.
Download speeds will suffer with large amounts of data stored and why would you want any more than a couple of hundred shots on the camera at one time? - in the old days we had to change film every 36 shots. Phone memory is different as phones have a multitude of functions (phone, camera, MP3 player, video camera, sat nav, games console etc. etc. so they need lots of memory. A camera only has one function - to take pictures and eat disposable income. Sorry, two functions - to take pictures, eat disposable income and weigh you down when your are out. Sorry three functions...............nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
__________________
John Sims Canon 60D, 30D, 10D, AE1 & some other stuff |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Boosting Ruler Sales
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 4,165
|
Quote:
Personally, I don't want a card that big for current-day DSLR photography. For one thing, I would wig out if my 'estimated shots left' never got below '999.' Maybe in a few years the MPs will go up, or the shot counters will go to 4 digits and I'll be tempted. Have Fun, |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|