![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
|
Should I. This will be my third wedding and I love to bounce flash.
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
|
Yeah do it! If you have a slave flash, might even add to the mood.
__________________
SAM |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 781
|
If you are able, try it out before the real wedding. Test different solutions. Pick the one that works for you. I've not done such a venue, but that's what I'd do. Test it.
|
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#4 |
|
"I like pictures of myself!"
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,244
|
This is when I use my lightsphere if I must bounce the flash, usually for the processional I just go direct flash, it sucks, but it gets the job done, and for the rest of the ceremony just use available light.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Light Bringer
|
I don't use flash in churches, even bounced (if that's possible) it will leave parts of the church bright and some very dark, but let us know how you get on after you do some test shots.
__________________
NZIPP Qualified Professional wedding photographer.
Camera and Lens Reviews ~ Wellington Wedding Photographer Wellington Wedding Photographer (site2) ~ Wellington Wedding Photographer (site3) Read all my FAQs (wedding, printing, lighting, books, etc) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
|
I am going to test it out later this week. I will let you know what I get. Tim, how can you not use flash at all. My pictures would turn out very blurry and dark.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeastern USA
Posts: 781
|
Perhaps high ISO, low shutter speed with IS lenses, and hope that the B&G stay still, which is usually the case during the ceremony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
User is banned from forums
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cross Lanes, WV
Posts: 47
|
Use flash for processional, available light for ceremony and maybe bounce for reception if it is not too dark and ceilings not too high.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
|
In big churches I've found that bouncing a flash is almost counter-productive. No matter how I do it it seems like light falloff is a problem.
E.g. if the bride is 22 feet in front of the back wall, and the right wall you're bouncing off of is 32 feet away, then the light bounced back will have to go past 12 f-stops of light falloff due to bouncing to the wall and back (sqrt2)^12=64. At the same time, because the bride is 22 feet in front of the back wall then the difference in light from the bride and the back wall will be ~9 f-stops different )sqrt2)^9=22.6. Don't believe me? Try it. The best results I've had were when I tried direct flash (or bounced 45*) with the subject to background distance being very small. Hopefully someone understands what I'm saying.
__________________
Tom XTi/BG-E3 Grip | 40Dx2 | Canon 17-55 f/2.8 IS |Canon 50 f/1.8 | 580EX |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| G7 bounce flash | Alva | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 8 | 23rd of June 2007 (Sat) 15:22 |
| Bounce flash | celter | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 16 | 28th of December 2006 (Thu) 13:08 |
| Ceiling limit for bounce? | queenbee288 | Weddings and Other Family Events | 15 | 3rd of May 2006 (Wed) 11:58 |
| FLASH: "To bounce, not bounce or sto-fen" | Bohlen Photo | Weddings and Other Family Events | 7 | 8th of April 2006 (Sat) 01:28 |
| Bounce Flash/Product Flash Problems | historybuff | Small Flash and Studio Lighting | 5 | 28th of March 2006 (Tue) 20:03 |