![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
|
If I add key words or add a collection and the metadeta is eddited on a jpg picture. Does the quality degrade. I know everytime you open a jpg file and then resave it (if eddited) then there is a slight degredation as it is a lossless file format. If i add a key word to a jpg, does that then "resave that file" and compress even more.
Can i convert a jpg to .dng format and then it does not become lossless or is .dng only for raw files?
__________________
Body : 50D and 400/xti + grip Lenses: 50mm 1.8 II / Tamron 17-50 f 2.8 / kit len / 70-200 f2.8L IS!!!! / Canon 1.4 TC II / Sigma 70-300mm dl Macro super Flash: 580 exII A whole bunch of other goodies. |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#2 |
|
Moderator, Archive Keeper
|
It does not degrade the quality.
Yes you can convert the jpegs to DNG, but since LR does non-destructive edits it really doen't matter, especially since both file formats are handled the same way with regards to edits. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009 |
No, the keywording will either be saved in Lightrooms database or an external XML file depending on how you've set LR up.
__________________
Anke 1D Mark IV | 16-35L II | 24-70 f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 100L Macro | 50 f/1.4 | 580EX II Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter | Tunbridge Wells | Flickr |
|
|
|
| sponsored links |
|
|
#5 |
|
Goldmember
|
Either way, as In2Photos said, it does not degrade quality... that metadata is put before or after image data ( I can't remember which) and the pixel data is shifted (unchanged) accordingly... no recompression of the image data.
__________________
David C. Equipment: Canon Dig. Rebel XT; 18-55mm EF-S; 28-105mm EF; 50mm 1.8 EF Sigma ef-500 DG ST, Elements, Gimp, Lightroom http://www.flickr.com/photos/dcrebelxt |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
"that rump shot is just adorable"
UK SE Photographer of the Year 2009 |
Blimey, I stand corrected, I thought it was for all
__________________
Anke 1D Mark IV | 16-35L II | 24-70 f/2.8 II | 70-200L f/2.8 II | 100L Macro | 50 f/1.4 | 580EX II Join the Official POTN UK South-East Thread | Follow me on Twitter | Tunbridge Wells | Flickr |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 62
|
Quote:
Anyway, provided you're editting the EXIF information and not image data, there will be no loss in image quality. Quote:
__________________
Canon 30D | 70-200mm f/2.8L IS | 100mm f/2.8 macro | 50mm f/1.4 | 16-35mm f/2.8L | 17-55mm f/2.8 IS | 580EX |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| JPG Quality tests - Q4 - Q12 | tim | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 13 | 26th of January 2009 (Mon) 15:54 |
| Lightroom and JPG | Yella Fella | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 3 | 13th of July 2007 (Fri) 05:46 |
| converting raw to jpg in lightroom???? | bphillips330 | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 9 | 1st of June 2007 (Fri) 07:59 |
| Lightroom HELP!!! raw to jpg | scooter | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 2 | 25th of February 2007 (Sun) 20:10 |
| Really - how much quality will I lose with 1 jpg save? | gwc1023 | RAW, Post Processing and Printing | 4 | 19th of February 2007 (Mon) 08:00 |