LOG IN    OR   REGISTER TO FORUMS


Tokina 16-50mm f/2.8

FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive
Thread started 06 Jun 2007 (Wednesday) 12:47   
LIST NEARBY THREADS
 
jcw122
Goldmember
jcw122's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
1,940 posts
West Chester, PA
[MORE/SHARE]

I really doubt anyone has it, but if you do, please post some sample shots. Thanks.

Post #1, Jun 06, 2007 12:47:43


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
AngryCorgi's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
11,534 posts
Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
[MORE/SHARE]

There are some shot samples (Nikon D200) and a review up now on Photozone. Obviously, there will be some differences between it and the copies for EF mount, but this at least gives a starting point.

Here's the link to the review:
http://www.photozone.d​e ...a_1650_28_nikon/ind​ex.htmexternal link

It seems by the review that the lens is a tad soft at 16mm @ f/2.8 on the edges, though it looks pretty decent by the time you get to f/4.

One thing to note, in looking at the samples, some of the shots look rather "muddy" all over. There is a comment in the review about a slight centering issue with the sample, so it might be playing into the odd results.

Enjoy!

Post #2, Jun 10, 2007 11:09:26


AngryCorgiexternal link (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
Joined Jun 2005
9,908 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

We need to see the Canon-mount/USA-release of this lens. That's where the money is for me.

Post #3, Jun 10, 2007 11:13:46




LOG IN TO REPLY
CountryBoy
"Tired of Goldmember label"
CountryBoy's Avatar
Joined May 2006
5,168 posts
Okie
[MORE/SHARE]

LightRules wrote in post #3353026external link
We need to see the Canon-mount/USA-release of this lens. That's where the money is for me.

I have a feeling you're going to make me regret getting the Tamron 17-50.

Post #4, Jun 10, 2007 11:20:42


Hi

LOG IN TO REPLY
jcw122
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
jcw122's Avatar
Joined Jul 2006
1,940 posts
West Chester, PA
[MORE/SHARE]

Looking at those Nikon sample photos from Photozone...the Tokina is wonderfully sharp in the center but it gets yucky on the outer parts.

Post #5, Jun 10, 2007 12:16:08


"Ill show you."-John Hammond
Gear List
:D "YES! I AM INVINSIBLE!"-Boris

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
ed rader's Avatar
Joined May 2005
22,032 posts
silicon valley
[MORE/SHARE]

jcw122 wrote in post #3353283external link
Looking at those Nikon sample photos from Photozone...the Tokina is wonderfully sharp in the center but it gets yucky on the outer parts.

it'll be a "cracker" in EF mount. i can almost guarantee it ;) !

ed rader

Post #6, Jun 10, 2007 12:18:49


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/external link
http://erader.zenfolio​.com/external link
5D3, SL1, 16-35L f4 IS, 24-70L II, 70-300L, 100-400L, 35f2 IS, 24mm f2.8 ef-s, 15mm FE (sigma), 270ex II, gitzo, markins, benro

LOG IN TO REPLY
condyk
Africa's #1 Tour Guide
condyk's Avatar
Joined Mar 2005
20,848 posts
Birmingham, UK
[MORE/SHARE]

I can see ya upgrading Ed lad ... you know you want to and you're willing to hammer and nail it to the front of that 5Drool to make it work for ya ;-)a

Post #7, Jun 10, 2007 12:39:26


http://photography-on-the.net .../showthread.php?t=1​203740

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tsmith
Formerly known as Bluedog_XT
Tsmith's Avatar
Joined Jul 2005
10,420 posts
South_the 601
[MORE/SHARE]

Not looking that smurffy handling the CA on the wide end, at least with the Nikon mount.

Post #8, Jun 10, 2007 15:55:12



Canon EOS 7D | Canon EF-S 10-22mm | Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS
Canon PowerShot S95
MY PBASE GALLERYexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Tee Why's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
10,595 posts
Pasadena, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

Look at the barrel distortion at the 16mm and CA.
I hate CA!
I would not sacrifice optics for a better build and pay extra for it over the tammy.

Post #9, Jun 10, 2007 23:35:40


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/external link

http://groups.yahoo.co​m/group/LAShooters/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
Joined Jun 2005
9,908 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Tee Why wrote in post #3356371external link
Look at the barrel distortion at the 16mm and CA.
I hate CA!
I would not sacrifice optics for a better build and pay extra for it over the tammy.

Too early, Tom. Too early to tell. Besides, some fine glass (e.g., 35L, 85f1.8, 100f2) have some pretty harsh CA and they are quite beloved nonetheless. But I still say the jury hasn't even convened.

Post #10, Jun 10, 2007 23:39:45




LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Tee Why's Avatar
Joined Feb 2006
10,595 posts
Pasadena, CA
[MORE/SHARE]

CA is not an absolute deal breaker, but not when cheaper alternatives exist that are better optically with less distortion and less CA.

I think it's a good idea about waiting for the sharpness issue, but I think tokes have been consistent between nikon/canon mounts in terms of CA and distortion. I don't use normal zooms much so I wouldn't get the Toke b/c it's expensive anyway but I really think it's not worth it. But we can wait for the Canon mount version to see.

Post #11, Jun 10, 2007 23:51:46


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/external link

http://groups.yahoo.co​m/group/LAShooters/external link

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
LightRules
"flat out embarrassing"
LightRules's Avatar
Joined Jun 2005
9,908 posts
[MORE/SHARE]

Tee Why wrote in post #3356462external link
CA is not an absolute deal breaker, but not when cheaper alternatives exist that are better optically with less distortion and less CA.

But that's the issue here: we don't know how it does "optically" quite yet. We know the Tokinas 12-24 and 100 Macro are excellent mechanically and optically, even with their CA numbers, yet they are solid lenses with quite the following.

I think it's a good idea about waiting for the sharpness issue, but I think tokes have been consistent between nikon/canon mounts in terms of CA and distortion. I don't use normal zooms much so I wouldn't get the Toke b/c it's expensive anyway but I really think it's not worth it. But we can wait for the Canon mount version to see

It is priced a little high, but they market their glass accordingly and for $650 (or thereabouts), generally you get what you pay for. So prima facie, I'm thinking it will be solid all-around. But we do need to wait for Canon-mount and see.

*****

Post #12, Jun 10, 2007 23:55:24




LOG IN TO REPLY
AngryCorgi
-Bouncing Boy- a POTN peion
AngryCorgi's Avatar
Joined Aug 2005
11,534 posts
Surrounded by bunnies, squirrels and a couple of crazy corgis in NoVA...
[MORE/SHARE]

LightRules wrote in post #3356485external link
It is priced a little high, but they market their glass accordingly and for $650 (or thereabouts), generally you get what you pay for. So prima facie, I'm thinking it will be solid all-around. But we do need to wait for Canon-mount and see.

Well.......no one should expect centering issues with a $650 lens. You could pay a $250 premium for IS and USM (i.e. 17-55 IS USM), and you'd whine and complain like a little girl if it had manufacturing faults. There is no excuse why any sample, regardless of mount, of a lens at this price point should exhibit serious mechanical/optical problems due to QC problems. I didn't get the impression from the article that photozone broke into Tokina and stole a pre-release test sample. I also do not believe anyone needs to wait for an EF sample or a US sample to comment on apparent manufacturing QC issues in tested Nikon samples. Furthermore, while CA may vary in amplitude between cameras/sensors, the general characteristic, for the most part, will not.

Focus accuracy or camera communication gripes should be the only real complaints held back for now.

Post #13, Jun 11, 2007 00:46:17


AngryCorgiexternal link (aka Tom) ...Tools...

...Knowledge is knowing that a tomato is a fruit, Wisdom is knowing not to include it in a fruit salad...

LOG IN TO REPLY
poah
Goldmember
Joined Aug 2006
1,003 posts
Glasgow
[MORE/SHARE]

the current sigma 18-50 f2.8 macro is getting the best results in the mags i the UK at the moment along with the tamron particularly for price and optics.

Post #14, Jun 11, 2007 02:55:16


Free printer profiles PM me for info

LOG IN TO REPLY
thedjo
Senior Member
thedjo's Avatar
Joined Nov 2006
318 posts
Behind EOS
[MORE/SHARE]

I got samples!!
It is already sold here in Japan.
I am impressed with the test shots by the way.. but after I tested 17-55 IS it is no comparison. canon is way better I think maybe because of the IS.

I will post as soon as I have the picture at home.

Post #15, Jun 11, 2007 04:24:37 as a reply to poah's post 1 hour earlier.


XTi, EF-S 17-55 f/2.8IS, 30mm f/1.4EX, Domke F-2, Contax T2, Olympus OM2 w/ 50mm, 24mm

LOG IN TO REPLY


LIST NEARBY THREADS
68,909 views & 0 likes for this thread
Tokina 16-50mm f/2.8
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive



NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO FORUMS

CHANGE BODY TEXT SIZE FOR ALL THREAD PAGES
POWERED BY AMASS 1.0version 1.0
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net


SEND FEEDBACK TO STAFF  |  JUMP TO FORUM...  |  FORUM RULES


Spent 0.00087 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
914 guests, 743 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 3341, that happened on Dec 11, 2014
Latest registered member is Demax

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality, we do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browser's data storage methods.