Approve the Cookies
This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Read More.
OK
Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Guest
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
Thread started 08 Jun 2007 (Friday) 20:01
Search threadPrev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC MACRO

 
El ­ Duderino
Goldmember
Avatar
1,921 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 08, 2007 20:01 |  #1

Just got this lens today and had to take some test shots. Nothing too exciting around here, but I thought I'd share. I got this as an upgrade from the kit lens. I hope it was a good decision.

These are straight out of the camera, just resized. All three of these were shot with an aperture of f/4 too:

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com …9/soybomb/June2​007021.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com …9/soybomb/June2​007022.jpg (external link)


PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com …9/soybomb/June2​007029.jpg (external link)


Do they look OK?

Nikon D600 | Bower 14mm f/2.8 | Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR | Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 VR | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR
500px (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Jun 08, 2007 20:10 |  #2

I think I see a touch of CA on the white flower petals. I'd like to see some more formal tests though, like the old brick wall test and 100% crops. The bokeh on the first two are a bit harsh for me, but I don't think any of the normal zooms for cropped bodies have good bokeh.

I recently saw and handled it and it seems to feel better than the Tamron and the higher magnification ratio is nice to have as well I bet.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
ed ­ rader
"I am not the final word"
Avatar
22,719 posts
Gallery: 3 photos
Likes: 270
Joined May 2005
Location: silicon valley
     
Jun 08, 2007 20:18 as a reply to  @ Tee Why's post |  #3

those look okay to my untrained eye. how about a few wide open :D !

ed rader


http://instagram.com/e​draderphotography/ (external link)
5D4, 80d, 16-35L III, 24-70L II, 70-200L F4 IS, 100-400L II, sigma 15mm FE, 35mm ef-s macro, 430exII, gitzo 3542, gitzo GM4562, markins Q10, markins Q3, kirk, really right stuff

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
Avatar
12,450 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Back in the 757
     
Jun 08, 2007 21:39 |  #4

look awesome! looks about like the non macro. but yes, wide open! and mention where you used the macro, just to see how good it is.


Last Shot Photography
My Site (external link) ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Duderino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,921 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 08, 2007 21:57 |  #5

Thanks for the feedback so far, everyone. I'll do some more shots tomorrow.

This lens has a similar "tone" compared to my Sigma 70-300mm APO. On bright days, the photos kind of turn out white. I don't know how to explain it. Maybe it's CA?


Nikon D600 | Bower 14mm f/2.8 | Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR | Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 VR | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR
500px (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,886 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 08, 2007 22:03 |  #6

Probably need to send a PM to Mike ("In2Photos") and ask him to start a new link to this thread in the archive called "18-50mm F2.8 EX DC Macro" (to discriminate from the non-macro version).


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Duderino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,921 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 08, 2007 22:16 as a reply to  @ Tony-S's post |  #7

Alright, I've never done a 100% crop before. I zoomed in with Photoshop until it said 100% at the bottom of the image. Looks about right to me. No editing done on this one.

f/8, 1/400:

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com …29/soybomb/flow​ercrop.jpg (external link)

Nikon D600 | Bower 14mm f/2.8 | Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR | Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 VR | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR
500px (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tony-S
Cream of the Crop
Avatar
9,886 posts
Likes: 141
Joined Jan 2006
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA
     
Jun 08, 2007 22:19 |  #8

In Photoshop, click on the "crop" icon and set to fixed size of 800 px by 800 px. This will give you a square of maximum size for the forum at 100% crop. Copy and paste this into a new document and save for the forum (i.e., correct size).


"Raw" is not an acronym, abbreviation, nor a proper noun; thus, it should not be in capital letters.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Jun 08, 2007 23:36 |  #9

Looks pretty good to me.
The photos looking white may be overexposure. CA is more purple fringes seen around a high contrast area, like the edges of the white petals. These are small shots, so I'm not sure if it's CA or not.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
El ­ Duderino
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Avatar
1,921 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Mar 2007
Location: Denver, CO
     
Jun 10, 2007 18:33 as a reply to  @ Tee Why's post |  #10

Here are a few more uninteresting photos that I took to test it out:

PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com …/v129/soybomb/k​urt2-1.jpg (external link)



PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com/albums/v129/soybo​mb/alley.jpg (external link)



PHOTOBUCKET EMBEDDING IS DISABLED BY THIS MEMBER.
Photobucket sends ads instead of embedding photos from their free galleries.
Click the link (if available) below to see the image in a gallery page.

http://img.photobucket​.com …v129/soybomb/sm​allfly.jpg (external link)


:cool:

Nikon D600 | Bower 14mm f/2.8 | Nikon 16-35mm f/4 VR | Nikon 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5 VR | Nikon 50mm f/1.8G | Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 VR
500px (external link) | flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
_aravena
isn't this answer a stickie yet?
Avatar
12,450 posts
Likes: 11
Joined Feb 2007
Location: Back in the 757
     
Jun 10, 2007 19:46 |  #11

I noticed that with mine that the result was similar to the 70-300 APO but not in all conditions. I'd have to look through to see, but still, i won't get rid of mine.


Last Shot Photography
My Site (external link) ~ Gear List ~ Bag Reviews

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
Tee ­ Why
"Monkey's uncle"
Avatar
10,596 posts
Likes: 4
Joined Feb 2006
Location: Pasadena, CA
     
Jun 11, 2007 01:16 |  #12

shot with the fly looks good. Have fun with the lens.


Gallery: http://tomyi.smugmug.c​om/ (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
turbodude
Goldmember
Avatar
2,707 posts
Likes: 1
Joined Nov 2006
Location: Las Vegas BABY!!!
     
Jun 11, 2007 03:06 |  #13

Nice i realy think i am gonna get this one.


My Twitter: http://twitter.com/pow​ersimagery (external link)
My Blog:
http://powersimagery.c​om/blog (external link)

My Website: www.powersimagery.com (external link)
My Job: Vegas Magazine (external link) | Retna LTD (external link) | Tao/Lavo Las Vegas (external link) | Espn.com (external link) | UFC (external link)
My Gear:Gear List

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
goatee
"nice but dim"
Avatar
5,239 posts
Joined May 2005
Location: North of London, UK
     
Jun 11, 2007 03:39 |  #14

These look great! I had the old non-macro version, and was very happy with it (just wanted a longer, and not so wide lens).

To be honest, I wouldn't even bother with things like shooting brick walls straight on - I never shoot things like that, so I'll zoom right in to make sure that the lens is focussing correctly, but other than that, leave 'lens tests' to people who like to measurebate :).


D7100, 50mm f/1.8, 18-140mm f/3.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/3.5-5.6 VR, SB800
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthre​ad.php?t=552906flickr (external link)

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
rrpruett
Senior Member
Avatar
383 posts
Joined Sep 2005
Location: Bakersfield CA
     
Jun 12, 2007 02:15 |  #15

Anyone shoot this lens on the new MKIII and if so did it work well? I am looking at getting this lens.


Rick

1D MKIII :evil: & MKII-N :D, 20D W/Grip :D,
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM, Canon 300mm f/2.8 IS, Canon 85mm f/2.8,Canon 24-70 f/2.8, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8, Sigma 120-300 2.8 2-580II Flash Extenders, and more.

  
  LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as a registered member)

125,692 views & 0 likes for this thread
Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC MACRO
FORUMS Sample Photo Archives Lens Sample Photo Archive 
AAA
x 1600
y 1600

Jump to forum...   •  Rules   •  Index   •  New posts   •  RTAT   •  'Best of'   •  Gallery   •  Gear   •  Reviews   •  Member list   •  Polls   •  Image rules   •  Search   •  Password reset

Not a member yet?
Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more... and all is free. Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting!


COOKIES DISCLAIMER: This website uses cookies to improve your user experience. By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies and to our privacy policy.
Privacy policy and cookie usage info.


POWERED BY AMASS forum software 2.0forum software
version 2.0 /
code and design
by Pekka Saarinen ©
for photography-on-the.net

Latest registered member is mason.snipes
707 guests, 403 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 6430, that happened on Dec 03, 2017

Photography-on-the.net Digital Photography Forums is the website for photographers and all who love great photos, camera and post processing techniques, gear talk, discussion and sharing. Professionals, hobbyists, newbies and those who don't even own a camera -- all are welcome regardless of skill, favourite brand, gear, gender or age. Registering and usage is free.