Canon Digital Photography Forums  

P.O.T.N. SUPPORT SHOP IS OPEN, check it out now!

Go Back   Canon Digital Photography Forums > 'Equipment Talk' section > Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Register Rules FAQ Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read



Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6th of June 2004 (Sun)   #1
bertelm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 24
Default Lens Upgrade Advice

I am looking to upgrade one of my lenses, so I need some advice.

Currently I have a Sigma 12-24, Canon 24-85 and Canon 75-300IS/USM. I was thinking of either replacing the Canon 24-85 with a 24-70L or the 75-300 with the 100-400L. Price wise, both lenses are similiar.

I use the 24-85 most, so in some ways it make sense to replace this first. I loose a little bit in reach, but can a faster/sharper lense.

On the other hand, replacing the 75-300, I would add 25% plus extra sharpness. Out of the the two canon lenses, I'm probably least satisfied with the 75-300. I find it soft after 200mm.

Any suggestions - I don't have any experience with these lenses, other than trying them out in the camera store. Given the lenses I have, which would give more more bang for my buck?
bertelm is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of June 2004 (Sun)   #2
ssim
POTN Landscape & Cityscape Photographer 2005
 
ssim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 10,762
Default

When I first got my 10D the first lens that I got was the 24-85. It didn't take me long to realize that it wasn't of the calibre that I wanted. I replaced it with the 24-70 f2.8 L. It is the lens that spends the most time on my camera. It is a great walk around lens.

The 100-400 is an awesome lens as well.

It really depends on what you spend most of your time shooting. If you need the length in the zoom range then the 100-400 is a great choice.

Of course you could go for broke (literally) and get both
__________________
My life is like one big RAW file....way too much post processing needed.

Sheldon Simpson | My Gallery | My Gear updated: 20JUL12
ssim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th of June 2004 (Sun)   #3
scottbergerphoto
Cream of the Crop
 
scottbergerphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
Posts: 5,430
Default

I have the 24-70 and 100-400. They are both great. You should get both. The one you buy first depends on which you want to have first.
Scott
__________________
One World, One Voice Against Terror,
Best Regards,
Scott
ScottBergerPhotography
scottbergerphoto is offline   Reply With Quote
This ad block will go away when you log in as member
Old 6th of June 2004 (Sun)   #4
CoolToolGuy
Boosting Ruler Sales
 
CoolToolGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 4,165
Default

The lens that I am most unhappy with is the 75-300 IS. So if it was me, I would replace it first. I have used the 100-400 L, and I was pleased with it, although I want something longer.

I have not used any of the normal or wide lenses you have, so I don't know how they perform.
__________________
Rick

My Gear list
CoolToolGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of June 2004 (Mon)   #5
nosquare2003
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong, China
Posts: 861
Default

I would choose 100-400 for one reason: -- you have extra reach to 400mm that you don't have it now. Anyway, it depends on your needs.
nosquare2003 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th of June 2004 (Mon)   #6
bertelm
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 24
Default

Thanks for all the advice.

My leanings are to the 100-400 lens. It gives me more reach. Also, if I compare the two lenses I have, the 75-300 lens I have is softer than my 24-85 lens. That would imply that I will notice the difference in sharpness more with the 100-400 lens.
bertelm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2004 (Tue)   #7
Olegis
Goldmember
 
Olegis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Israel
Posts: 2,073
Default

I myself would go to the 100-400 too - it's excellent optically and the IS adds a lot to it's overall value. Someday I'll by myself one of those ...
__________________
Best wishes,
Oleg.

www.Olegis.com
My equipment list
'I take orders from no one except the photographers' – Harry S Truman
Olegis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th of June 2004 (Tue)   #8
Belmondo
Admin
 
Belmondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 92210
Posts: 42,710
Default

Every time somebody asks a 'which lens' question, the members provide a bewildering range of answers. In this case, we've seen suggestiongs that cover a range from 24mm to 400mm. Eventually someone chimes in with the obvious answer: "Only you can answer which lens will be best for you."

I have both the lenses in question, and I'd be hard-pressed to decide which is more useful. The 24-70 is the lens that stays on my MK II almost all the time. There are a couple reasons for this:
1. It's the most useful focal range for all-around shooting.
2. It's a fast lens
3. It fits in my Mini-Trekker.
4. Knowledgeable people consider this to be a very sexy lens.

On the other hand, the 100-400 is my 'go to' lens for railroad photography. My train photos are the main justification I have for buying all this gear, and most of my most important shots have been taken with the 100-400. Here are a couple considerations with it:
1. It is also a useful focal range (4X), but definitely on the long side.
2. It's not particularly fast, although very useable in normal daylight situations. It does have the additional potential of being coupled to a CANON 1.4X or 2.0X TC, although at the cost of 1 or 2 f/stops respectively.
3. It doesn't fit in anything (except possibly the back of my truck). It's a brute, especially at 400mm (remember: it's a push/pull zoom and is almost a mile long when fully extended).
4. Everyone thinks it's sexy. It's big, white, and stands out like a sore thumb. It's a great conversation-starter, albeit very often with people you don't necessarily want to talk to.


Ultimately this is a decision that can only be made for you by you. Getting all these opinions might be helpful, but every opinion here is based on the personal preference on the person offering it, and can really only serve as food for thought.

You decide. It's your money.
__________________
I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!
Belmondo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
help with upgrade advice please. dakkon Canon EOS Digital Cameras 5 15th of July 2007 (Sun) 12:21
Looking to upgrade and could do with advice. Stepgar Canon EOS Digital Cameras 3 14th of March 2007 (Wed) 20:17
upgrade advice saravrose Canon EOS Digital Cameras 12 10th of December 2005 (Sat) 01:36
Upgrade advice kram RAW, Post Processing and Printing 3 13th of September 2005 (Tue) 22:45
upgrade advice? Warman Canon G-series Digital Cameras 4 23rd of March 2004 (Tue) 12:45


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 00:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.12
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
This forum is not affiliated with Canon in any way and is run as a free user helpsite by Pekka Saarinen, Helsinki Finland. You will need to register in order to be able to post messages. Cookies are required for registering and posting. HTML in messages is not allowed, plain website addresses are automatically made active by the board.