Index  •   • New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
New posts  •   • RTAT  •   • 'Best of'  •   • Gallery  •   • Gear  •   • Reviews
Register to forums    Log in

 
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses
Thread started 08 Jun 2004 (Tuesday) 06:37
Prev/next
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

I've got the 70-300 DO IS USM - first impressions

 
Jesper
Goldmember
Jesper's Avatar
2,742 posts

Joined Oct 2003

The Netherlands
MORE INFO

I visited the USA last week and ofcourse I also went to the famous B&H store (external link). I bought Canon's new DO zoom lens - the EF 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM (external link). I wanted it because I wanted to have a good telezoom lens, but not a big, conspicuous, heavy white one like the various 70-200 L lenses. They only had one lens left at B&H when I bought it, and my brother also wanted to buy it, so he ordered it and got it sent home in 3 days - so it looks like it wasn't really out of stock...

Here is my current Canon lens collection.

IMAGE NOT FOUND IMAGE IS A REDIRECT OR MISSING!
http://home.hccnet.nl ...de.jong/images/lens​es.jpg (external link)
HTTP response: 404 | MIME changed to 'text/html' | Byte size: ZERO


As you see the 70-300 is about the same size as the 17-40 and 28-135. My first impressions:

- For its size, it's heavy (720g, almost 1.5x the 17-40), but if you compare it with the 70-200 f/2.8 L IS USM (1470g) it's light and small.

- The IS works even better than on the 28-135 and it's almost silent (the 28-135 makes a "whirring" noise with the IS on).

- The zoom lock is very nice, I wish the 28-135 had this! It would be nice if Canon would make an 28-135 mark II, with 2-mode IS and zoom lock.

- The lens works great on the 10D - I made a photo of the Empire State building from around 18th Street and you can even see the people standing on the Empire State building!

I like the lens a lot, it was expensive, but very nice. The only real minus for me is that it isn't a fast lens, f/4.5-5.6.
Jun 08, 2004 06:37

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)
roanjohn
Goldmember
roanjohn's Avatar
3,791 posts

Joined Dec 2003

New York, NY
MORE INFO

WOW, tiny.......for its range.

And can you fit a 58mm filter in that??

Ro1

Jun 08, 2004 07:17



www.pbase.com/roanjohnexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
Boosting Ruler Sales
CoolToolGuy's Avatar
4,175 posts

Joined Aug 2003

Maryland, USA
MORE INFO

I'm curious - does it extend much when zoomed? If so, how much?

Jun 08, 2004 07:47

Rick

My Gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
Belmondo
Cream of the Crop
Belmondo's Avatar
42,727 posts

Joined Jul 2003

92210
MORE INFO

Just when I got used to lusting only for lenses with red rings on them, I now find I have to add green to the list.

It really does seem to offer an excellent compromise between size and performance, and optically it has to be considered exceptional. You get the sense that if would be exponentially more expensive if they tried to make it any faster. (the 400mm f/4.0 DO is about $5,000 US).

Looks like a winner to me although the proof will be in the images produced.

Jun 08, 2004 07:49

I'm not short. I'm concentrated awesome!

LOG IN TO REPLY
cmM
Goldmember
cmM's Avatar
5,705 posts

Joined Apr 2004

Chicago / San Francisco
MORE INFO
banned

Quick question for you:
How much money did you have when you walked into B&H ?
How moch money did you have when you walked out of B&H ?
:P

Congrats on your purchase. I've heard good things about this lens so far.

Jun 08, 2004 07:58



LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
42,233 posts
GALLERY: 47 photos

Joined Apr 2003

Rhode Island USA
MORE INFO

I am very interested in this lens.. on a 10D minus the battery grip. it would fit in my little case I got for my old Olympus 2100.. it would not scare people with that small lens.. and 300mm is pretty much exactly what I want on a "walk around lens" (the 28-300mm I currently have is collecting dust as it is CRAP)

Wish it wasn't so damn pricey :(

Jun 08, 2004 09:11

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
nosquare2003
Senior Member
861 posts
Joined Dec 2003

Hong Kong, China
MORE INFO

So you've gone to DO!!!

Jun 08, 2004 09:34



LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Jesper's Avatar
2,742 posts

Joined Oct 2003

The Netherlands
MORE INFO

roanjohn: Yes, the filter size you need for this lens is 58mm. A lot smaller than the 77mm of the 17-40 and 72mm of the 28-135, so the filters are less expensive.

CoolToolGuy: It does extend a bit when zoomed - but it's still a lot shorter than the 75-300 (here is a comparison imageexternal link from dpreview.com) and ofcourse it's a lot smaller than a white L lens... ?!

cmM: The price was US$ 1,299 and including tax and a 7-year Mack warranty it was US$ 1,449. A lot of money, but here in Europe it would have been even more expensive! Actually, I paid by credit card so technically the bank still owns it..... 8)

Jun 08, 2004 14:09

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Jesper's Avatar
2,742 posts

Joined Oct 2003

The Netherlands
MORE INFO

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
I am very interested in this lens.. on a 10D minus the battery grip. it would fit in my little case I got for my old Olympus 2100.. it would not scare people with that small lens.. and 300mm is pretty much exactly what I want on a "walk around lens" (the 28-300mm I currently have is collecting dust as it is CRAP)

Wish it wasn't so damn pricey :(

Yes, you can easily "shoot people" 8) with this lens without them knowing it. First of all you're so far away that they won't notice you and second, the lens is so small and inconspicuous that they won't know you're zooming in on them. Ofcourse 70mm is a bit long sometimes, especially on the 10D (1.6x) - it's really a lens for photographing details.

Jun 08, 2004 14:16

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

LOG IN TO REPLY
CoolToolGuy
Boosting Ruler Sales
CoolToolGuy's Avatar
4,175 posts

Joined Aug 2003

Maryland, USA
MORE INFO

Jesper wrote:
CoolToolGuy: It does extend a bit when zoomed - but it's still a lot shorter than the 75-300 (here is a comparison imageexternal link from dpreview.com) and ofcourse it's a lot smaller than a white L lens... ?!

Jesper,

Thanks for the link. All the images of it that I had seen until now showed it retracted. It looks like it can be a very compact setup for those that need it.

Jun 08, 2004 15:40

Rick

My Gear list

LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
ron chappel's Avatar
3,554 posts

Joined Sep 2003

Qld ,Australia
MORE INFO

CyberDyneSystems wrote:
(the 28-300mm I currently have is collecting dust as it is CRAP)

I'm curious-which brand/model do you have?
I just finnished some thorough testing of a late model sigma and was quite impressed.It was actually about equal to the best cheap kit zooms

Jun 08, 2004 18:29



LOG IN TO REPLY
CyberDyneSystems
Admin (type T-2000)
CyberDyneSystems's Avatar
42,233 posts
GALLERY: 47 photos

Joined Apr 2003

Rhode Island USA
MORE INFO

... I've got the Sigma.. it's not the latest version but who knows what actual imporvements they did.

It focuses.. sometimes.. thats the biggest issue.. and manual focus seems out of the question due to the fact that moving the ring a fration of a mm causes it to alter focus dramticlly.. you just can't fine tune it :(

Jun 08, 2004 18:40

GEAR LIST
CDS' HOT LINKS
Jake Hegnauer Photographyexternal link

LOG IN TO REPLY
LazyPhotographer
Goldmember
LazyPhotographer's Avatar
3,163 posts

Joined Nov 2003

Las Vegas, NV
MORE INFO

Could you post some links to pics taken with this lens? We can't torment ourselves very much without the visual aid. :wink:

Jun 08, 2004 18:46

LazyPhotographer: One who uses a telephoto lens to shoot pictures out the car window or from a balcony. :arrow: No Bird Posts Left Behind, dammit! :twisted:

LOG IN TO REPLY
ron ­ chappel
Cream of the Crop
Honorary Moderator
ron chappel's Avatar
3,554 posts

Joined Sep 2003

Qld ,Australia
MORE INFO

Had a look at your website jesper but couldn't tell for sure which ones were from this lens

Can you give an example of a direct comparison with the 28-135? :)

Jun 09, 2004 01:24



LOG IN TO REPLY
Jesper
THREAD ­ STARTER
Goldmember
Jesper's Avatar
2,742 posts

Joined Oct 2003

The Netherlands
MORE INFO

The photos in the last two collections on my Fotopic site ( http://jesper.fotopic.​netexternal link - the "New York" and "Lancaster County" collections) were all made with the 17-40 and the 70-300. Unfortunately the EXIF info wasn't preserved in the JPEGs so you can't see which of the lenses I used when you click the "Image Info" button... but I guess that with most of the images you can guess which lens I used... also, many of the images there have been cropped or color and contrast edited in Photoshop, so they don't really show the detail, color and contrast that the lens captured.

I didn't make any direct comparison shots between the 70-300 and the 28-135 yet, and I don't have time right now (and the sun is already low on the horizon here) but when I have the time I could make some comparisons with the camera on a tripod etc. - I will post examples later.

Jun 09, 2004 13:40

Canon EOS 5D Mark III

LOG IN TO REPLY
sponsored links
(this ad will go away when you log in as registered member)

26,833 views & 0 likes for this thread
I've got the 70-300 DO IS USM - first impressions
FORUMS Canon Cameras, Lenses & Accessories Canon EF and EF-S Lenses

NOT A MEMBER YET? CLICK HERE TO REGISTER TO THE FORUMS
Registered members get all the features: search, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, own reviews...




Send feedback to staff    •   Jump to forum...    •   Rules    •   Index    •   New posts    •   RTAT    •   'Best of'    •   Gallery    •   Gear    •   Reviews    •   Polls

COOKIES DISCLAIMER: By using this site you agree that some cookies will be stored on your browser. For unlogged users we store one session id cookie. For registered members we store (in addition to login session cookie) only cookies that are essential for required functionality. We do not store any personal tracking data in cookies or other browsers' data storage methods.

POWERED BY AMASS 1.33version 1.33
made in Finland
by Pekka Saarinen
for photography-on-the.net
Spent 0.0009 for 4 database queries.
PAGE COMPLETED IN 0.02s
Latest registered member is LisaE
701 guests, 682 members online
Simultaneous users record so far is 5175, that happened on Jun 16, 2015